Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dd05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 41769380000AC; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 08:43:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Tq27B-0004VA-Nf for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 01 Jan 2013 13:42:45 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.34] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Tq27B-0004V1-6o for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 01 Jan 2013 13:42:45 +0000 Received: from out1.ip03ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.239]) by relay2.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Tq279-0006ZX-Gx for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 01 Jan 2013 13:42:44 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AiYCAIHk4lBOlmtY/2dsb2JhbAANOIF/u3GDEQEBAQEDOFELCQ8JFg8JAwIBAgFFEwYCAQGuSoMwjkeMV4EagykDlgyTPA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,391,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="409560536" Received: from host-78-150-107-88.as13285.net (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([78.150.107.88]) by out1.ip03ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 01 Jan 2013 13:37:11 +0000 Message-ID: <50E2E688.1070005@psk31.plus.com> Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 13:37:12 +0000 From: g3zjo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <50E1C9C5.1040905@psk31.plus.com> In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130101-0, 01/01/2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay2.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Roger Yes nice to see your signal there, 500KHz was fun and we did well with QRP powers. I shall be using QRP on 472kHz also. I stayed on until the bitter end filling the last possible WSPR slot. I have lots of audio files and screen shots too which will need sorting when I get the time. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Scan-Signature: 3f8d74a8c70dd416d0a3a1dbcb9bb89f Subject: Re: LF: The final countdown Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d409150e2e81714b9 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Roger Yes nice to see your signal there, 500KHz was fun and we did well with QRP powers. I shall be using QRP on 472kHz also. I stayed on until the bitter end filling the last possible WSPR slot. I have lots of audio files and screen shots too which will need sorting when I get the time. I couldn't QSY to 472 instantly due to my HiQ antenna. Today the WX was kind so I have dismantled the coil assembly and utilised the last tap of the extra few turns I added a while ago, it looks like I calculated it right it resonates.:-) Just seen your signal climbing up the WSPR window, my report to you is the same as on 500, however I note you are seeing me so that is one for the book. Do you think it is a lack of noise your end? Here I still have to see what the Plasma QRM is like at night, it has been clean on a non resonant antenna but resonating my inv. L on 500 or 472 induces signals into the non resonant antenna so only now will we find out. 73 Eddie On 31/12/2012 20:41, Roger Lapthorn wrote: > Thanks for spots Eddie and others. > > Just closed down for the very last time on 500kHz with an hour of WSPRing at ~10mW ERP before the shack became grandson's bedroom again. > > I have greatly enjoyed the 500kHz band and look forward to 472kHz. Earliest real opportunity on the new band will be late tomorrow (WSPR) then after Jan 3rd when grandchildren go home and I get my shack back. > > 73s > Roger G3XBM > > On 31 Dec 2012, at 17:22, g3zjo wrote: > >> Last Hours of WSPR on 500KHz >> >> Count Down..................HOURS >> >> 2012-12-31 11:38 G3ZJO/12 0.501510 -20 0 IO92ng +7 0.005 G8HUH IO81mg 181 112 >> 2012-12-31 12:36 G3ZJO/11 0.501510 -11 0 IO92ng +7 0.005 G3WCB IO91rm 86 53 >> 2012-12-31 13:56 G3ZJO/10 0.501513 -18 0 IO92ng +7 0.005 G0KTN IO81ti 145 90 >> 2012-12-31 14:44 G3ZJO/9 0.501507 -18 1 IO92ng +7 0.005 G8ALS IO92fk 49 30 >> 2012-12-31 15:48 G3ZJO/8 0.501511 -21 1 IO92ng +7 0.005 M0DTS IO94il 247 153 >> 2012-12-31 16:24 G3ZJO/7 0.501508 -31 1 IO92ng +7 0.005 PA3ABK/50 JO21it 385 239 >> 2012-12-31 17:14 G3ZJO/6 0.501510 -11 1 IO92ng +7 0.005 G3WCB IO91rm 86 53 >> >> Depends which way you look at it but after 23:00 there will be Zero Hours to go. >> >> Eddie >> >