Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-df05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 8C47438000089; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 13:55:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TrXeu-0006jy-Jv for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 17:35:48 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TrXeu-0006jp-6r for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 17:35:48 +0000 Received: from smtpout4.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.68] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TrXes-0005Qe-DN for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 17:35:47 +0000 Received: from AGB ([2.26.46.0]) by mwinf5d60 with ME id kHbN1k00p00DzFE03HbPi8; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 18:35:25 +0100 Message-ID: <4E34DB9D832043ABB917FA2FEC9AEC6A@AGB> From: "Graham" To: References: <28CB8EF648E7418BB5C2D4802F72C23C@IBM7FFA209F07C>, , <50E85BC5.17940.19178EA@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com> <50E85F3B.8451.19EFE76@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com> In-Reply-To: <50E85F3B.8451.19EFE76@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com> Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 17:35:22 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Oh my Oh my Well as its past 1600 z , may be its past the op's bed time ? On a serious note , a ssb qso mid day in the barren wastelands north of Watford-gap is one thing , Am is may be a little too far after dark ? [...] Content analysis details: (0.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.68 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.2 STOX_REPLY_TYPE STOX_REPLY_TYPE X-Scan-Signature: b77892ad90d0261eaf071f4f6cf31464 Subject: Re: LF: AM on 472kHz Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40d950e877063a88 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Oh my Oh my Well as its past 1600 z , may be its past the op's bed time ? On a serious note , a ssb qso mid day in the barren wastelands north of Watford-gap is one thing , Am is may be a little too far after dark ? Depending on your relative qth , ground wave signals will be considerable day/night As the mode will by its nature cover all the not allowed qrg's I wonder how long it will be before there is a passing (over head) comment ? G.. -------------------------------------------------- From: "Mike Dennison" Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2013 5:13 PM To: Subject: LF: AM on 472kHz > Making a complete mockery of any attempt to persuade users of > different modes to coexist responsibly, an AM QSO is now going on in > the middle of the band! > > I give up! > > Mike, G3XDV >