Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dc05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id D0FA538000098; Sat, 12 Jan 2013 15:14:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Tu7Q9-0003GA-PZ for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 12 Jan 2013 20:11:13 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Tu7Q9-0003G0-B9 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 12 Jan 2013 20:11:13 +0000 Received: from smtpout1.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.29] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Tu7Q7-00066V-83 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 12 Jan 2013 20:11:12 +0000 Received: from AGB ([2.26.47.206]) by mwinf5d13 with ME id n8An1k00h4Sun2S038Ana6; Sat, 12 Jan 2013 21:10:50 +0100 Message-ID: <2AE57EDDBF6540248FA1F91558FE28B3@AGB> From: "Graham" To: References: In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2013 20:10:47 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: G 3585 might be better as 3589 is being used for normal ros-hf mode ? G. From: Gary - G4WGT Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2013 7:42 PM To: LF Group ; rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk Subject: LF: ROS MF tonight. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: bf9cd6b3d49c805062abf73a1027fea8 Subject: Re: LF: ROS MF tonight. Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00AA_01CDF100.E8D77220" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_60_70,HTML_MESSAGE, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d408550f1c4371a67 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00AA_01CDF100.E8D77220 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable G 3585 might be better as 3589 is being used for normal = ros-hf mode ? G. From: Gary - G4WGT=20 Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2013 7:42 PM To: LF Group ; rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk=20 Subject: LF: ROS MF tonight. Hi All, Running ROS MF QSO mode on 476 tonight using MF-7 or MF-2. Please reply on 476kHz or QSX 80m 3589kHz but using ROS in MF mode (476) = MF-7 or MF-2. GL 73, Gary - G4WGT ------=_NextPart_000_00AA_01CDF100.E8D77220 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
G   3585  might  be better  as  = 3589 =20 is   being  used  for  normal  ros-hf = mode =20 ?
 
G.

Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2013 7:42 PM
To: LF Group ; rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups= .co.uk=20
Subject: LF: ROS MF tonight.

Hi All,
 
Running ROS MF QSO mode on 476 tonight = using MF-7=20 or MF-2.
 
Please reply on 476kHz or QSX 80m = 3589kHz but using=20 ROS in MF mode (476) MF-7 or MF-2.
 
GL
 
73,
 
Gary - G4WGT
------=_NextPart_000_00AA_01CDF100.E8D77220--