Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-df06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 1576F38000090; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 13:45:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Tqpba-0002vf-Gl for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 18:33:26 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Tqpba-0002vW-0l for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 18:33:26 +0000 Received: from smtpout2.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.42] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TqpbY-0004oz-5L for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 18:33:24 +0000 Received: from AGB ([2.26.14.171]) by mwinf5d26 with ME id jWZ31k00N3hSEUJ03WZ3Zf; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 19:33:03 +0100 Message-ID: <21290C74DB1D49F390F969DF91DC48A0@AGB> From: "Graham" To: References: <20961.6c91afbf.3d962a97@aol.com> <1FE273E837AA4D978CBB5A745E34368A@AGB> <50E5BACC.9070803@freenet.de> <1357233471.37961.YahooMailNeo@web87405.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <1357233471.37961.YahooMailNeo@web87405.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 18:33:02 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: D.. Must be rubber rock's then if there some how drifted in to the middle of the new band ! E-Bay is full of £3 DDS-VFO c/w master oscillator , much cheaper than crystals , [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.42 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 913d7a7c91a460d176c89ad756da16f9 Subject: Re: LF: 630m Band Plan Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_014E_01CDE9E0.C3BDE2C0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40da50e5d1bc7ad7 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_014E_01CDE9E0.C3BDE2C0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable D.. Must be rubber rock's then if there some how drifted in to the = middle of the new band ! E-Bay is full of =A33 DDS-VFO c/w master oscillator , much = cheaper than crystals ,=20 I'm afraid , we have a out break of , as the professional fixed = beacon people refer, 'vanity beacons' or the classic two wrongs = making a right , I'ts ok as some one else is there so I will as = well , or to coin a phrase ' I'm all right jack' =20 G. From: DENNIS EASTERLING=20 Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 5:17 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Subject: Re: LF: 630m Band Plan I think Wolf is right, a nice wide part in the centre and beacons on the = high side, but we must remember that some are rockbound at the moment so = make due allowance. HNY everybody and hope for some more DX QSOs. 73 Dennis M0JXM From: wolf_dl4yhf To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Thursday, 3 January 2013, 17:07 Subject: Re: LF: 630m Band Plan Am 03.01.2013 17:42, schrieb Graham: The more one looks at this , the more sensible it becomes , = I like the idea of a wide band mixed modes area 474 usb ,=20 As without any formalities we can see the more primitive = modes are congregating in the centre of the band , assumedly = necessary prevent out of band transmissions due to vfo drift or the = like ? Objection ;o) Let those 'primitive' but predominant modes like CW remain = at the start of the band. So they will suffer from the digital / beacon / etc QRM only from one = side.=20 Also keep beacon-like transmission as far away from the QSO / CW segment = as possible. You will know what I mean when the first 24/7 / 365 day = beacon appears ( I really hope this day never comes). Just my two Euro-cents of wisdom though ...=20 Wolf . ------=_NextPart_000_014E_01CDE9E0.C3BDE2C0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
D..
 
Must  be  rubber  rock's then  if  = there =20 some how  drifted  in to the  middle of the  = new band=20 !
 
E-Bay  is  full  of  =A33  DDS-VFO  = c/w =20 master  oscillator , much  cheaper than  crystals  , =
 
I'm afraid  , we  have a  out  break  = of  ,=20 as the  professional  fixed  beacon people  refer, = 'vanity=20 beacons' or the  classic   two  wrongs making  = a =20 right  , I'ts ok  as  some  one else  is  = there so=20 I will  as well  , or to  coin a phrase  ' I'm all = right=20 jack'  
 
G.
 
 

From: DENNIS EASTERLING =
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 5:17 PM
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org= =20
Subject: Re: LF: 630m Band Plan

I think Wolf is right, a nice wide part in the centre and = beacons on=20 the high side, but we must remember that some are rockbound at the = moment so=20 make due allowance.   HNY everybody and hope for some more DX=20 QSOs.
 
73 Dennis M0JXM

From: wolf_dl4yhf <dl4yhf@freenet.de>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org= =20
Sent: Thursday, 3 = January=20 2013, 17:07
Subject: = Re: LF:=20 630m Band Plan

Am 03.01.2013 17:42, schrieb=20 Graham:
The  more  one  = looks=20 at  this , the  more  sensible  it  = becomes =20 ,  I like the  idea  of  a  wide  = band =20 mixed modes   area   474 usb  ,
 
As without  any =20 formalities  we  can  see  the  more =20 primitive   modes  are  congregating  in = the =20 centre  of the  band , assumedly necessary =  prevent out of=20 band transmissions due to  vfo  drift  or the  = like =20 ?

Objection ;o) Let those 'primitive' but = predominant modes like CW remain at the start of the band.
So they = will=20 suffer from the digital / beacon / etc QRM only from one side.
Also = keep=20 beacon-like transmission as far away from the QSO / CW segment as = possible. You=20 will know what I mean when the first 24/7  / 365 day beacon appears = ( I=20 really hope this day never comes).

Just my two Euro-cents of = wisdom=20 though ...

Wolf .



------=_NextPart_000_014E_01CDE9E0.C3BDE2C0--