Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dd05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 6EB4738000099; Sun, 20 Jan 2013 15:40:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Tx1gg-0001R8-MS for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 20 Jan 2013 20:40:18 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Tx1gg-0001Qz-9D for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 20 Jan 2013 20:40:18 +0000 Received: from smtpout5.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.80] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Tx1ge-0000Zw-CO for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 20 Jan 2013 20:40:17 +0000 Received: from AGB ([2.26.47.153]) by mwinf5d67 with ME id qLfs1k01R3JJ98J03Lftv6; Sun, 20 Jan 2013 21:39:55 +0100 Message-ID: <1DDE192F96FB4A2783B5CCCEC13EE6F0@AGB> From: "Graham" To: References: <000a01cdf72a$83b867c0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>, <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FB6AF55@ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be> In-Reply-To: <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FB6AF55@ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be> Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2013 20:39:52 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Would be so , if there where not for band edges being defined In this case, the qso took place inside each others band edges , so its defiantly cross band G :) [...] Content analysis details: (0.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.80 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.2 STOX_REPLY_TYPE STOX_REPLY_TYPE X-Scan-Signature: 49f0f587e44d6711c57b8a4e950ba850 Subject: Re: LF: Countries MF Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d409150fc56451122 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Would be so , if there where not for band edges being defined In this case, the qso took place inside each others band edges , so its defiantly cross band G :) -------------------------------------------------- From: "Rik Strobbe" Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2013 6:45 PM To: Subject: RE: LF: Countries MF > Hi Tony, > > I would call our QSO not as x-band but just split-frequency. > 501kHz and 472kHz is just a ratio of 1.06 (or 6% apart). > To compare: 160m (1810-2000kHz) has a ratio of 1.10, 80m (3500-3800) has a > ratio of 1.09, 10m (28-29.7MHz) has a ratio of 1.06 and so on. > So far I am still bound to 501-504kHz :-( ... but at the bright sight: > only very few hams call say they have their own private frequency segment > (till another ON would join me). > > 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T > > > ________________________________________ > Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > [owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] namens traumwandler@sensemail.ch > [traumwandler@sensemail.ch] > Verzonden: zondag 20 januari 2013 18:16 > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Onderwerp: Re: LF: Countries MF > > So far I've worked in CW: > G, GI, GW, EI, SM, PA, OK, OM, DL, HB9, S57, YO, and ON (X-Band > 500kHz), F and OH (X-Band 3.5 MHz) > Where are the stations from OZ, LA and GM? > 73 de HB9ASB > > > Am 20.01.2013 17:23, schrieb mal hamilton: >> MF >> >> Since 1st Jan 2013 the following countries have been worked on CW. >> DL, EI0, OK2, OM1, PA3, GW4, GI4, HB9, LA9, S57. Lots of others have >> been worked from the same countries. >> Looking out for DX contacts if anyone is available on CW >> >> DE G3KEV