Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dk01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id B7516380000CD; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 18:02:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Tt4dQ-0008R4-5G for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 23:00:36 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Tt4dO-0008Qv-Uo for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 23:00:34 +0000 Received: from nm10-vm0.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com ([77.238.189.90]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Tt4dM-0000IR-F6 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 23:00:33 +0000 Received: from [212.82.105.224] by nm10.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 09 Jan 2013 23:00:10 -0000 Received: from [212.82.108.236] by tm20.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 09 Jan 2013 23:00:10 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1001.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 09 Jan 2013 23:00:10 -0000 X-DKIM-Result: Domain=yahoo.co.uk Result=Good and Known Domain X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 200778.24985.bm@omp1001.mail.ird.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 99649 invoked by uid 60001); 9 Jan 2013 23:00:10 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s1024; t=1357772410; bh=DxD6Sm/K3nG9TnV3TWXyKjC6Cb92tHw+I4ZfaFj87V8=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=L5gwRGUN7+xWDhUqkzKEdKQSbxIiL4aA5RsJEoQOnIpTkcaEvG3Em17e0QrSySIVok1T1RrCP6FBlsM8tc+l6UI78L4vKvhbJbj+WYAKXFm4oxEtKnX2ouIMy1o3aqLF7OkJYPBPrY/+YDMv5fNzWXpJBQ1i0xr7jis6Zg4TPPk= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=G8ydGPWDoYGuSc86SFx5MOSWjs8PwQZQzWC+bHAkizwZGBsf2Do70ZzRN4L0FQwHKQ9Wgm4r4y1nNVdLpsWQYawm/nIthnIALg8e+Mvnn0xSgLkK6cADoVR4FmJERyxwkzmZj+6mEO1g190T+pdfXWik5CQAIODrPsWkGkF04ck=; X-YMail-OSG: Q8Bml1MVM1lWd.hVzxRpxJqAl6asTElWXFD6gv2w1dl2UQp tRBlqwwHCrBQez5u7Uk.9V1LHCULPsG6hcit0vlU5DWv5LewxXWTGFdnbOCX q4nckeGdus7uzOLwWBE_KoWUjaVn8MypOT5c8oh_S1JFUrMT0ntUwfSTTawt 54NnX.w9yHnDNaqlWrOA4Us4LbSPnChI0TgCJDzL5CL1InFYd.wgRKeR7nKC v8CUvfaUukJVptP1UPICjCWyJ4QOtmi_.z_Fsa3avcgyiyRkqvar7oK__SFH a7GUZHS6Y2y5Zxcgc1_0hgmXGy_P6PjlCVixtenWJwAWsZa4BnzzEBlvL7g3 JQYJwvIJcLq_6XS3RNQVpI1y7N.zSP5BkJXGyNst3YY4Fs3J7V.6L3rks39v SihLRsMpw9TXy7MPAT8uBL6W9RHfuxAzUged9mADi3usXSAiTuTyN1.D4wRm YxzArIqWPMsO2GI5IAMnjfHB_bpcc9LK5Q9Wj17Mv2HW3.A-- Received: from [81.152.199.23] by web133204.mail.ir2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 23:00:09 GMT X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 001.001,SEkgQWxhbgrCoApQZXRlIHNhaWQ6LS0tLS0KIkkgYW0gbm90ICAgY29tcGxhaW5pbmcgaXRzIGp1c3QgSSB3b25kZXJlZCB3aHkgb3IgaWYgdGhlcmUgaGFkIGJlZW4gYSBjb21iaW5pbmcgb3IgICBzb21ldGhpbmcuIgrCoApJIHRoaW5rIHRoYXQncyB3aGF0IEkgc2FpZC4KwqAKSSBhbSBubyBsb25nZXIgcmVnaXN0ZXJlZCB3aXRoIHRoZSBZYWhvbyBHcm91cCBiZWNhdXNlIHRoZSBCbGFja3NoZWVwIHNlZW1lZCB0byBiZSBqdXN0IGFzIGFjdGl2ZSBhbmQgZG9pbmcgZXZlcnl0aGluZyBJIG5lZWQgcGVyc28BMAEBAQE- X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.130.494 References: <1357741041.84828.YahooMailNeo@web133205.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <50ED8257.8010001@psk31.plus.com> <1357747491.77414.YahooMailNeo@web133206.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <6DDE45A2DAD5431F88116F9E053ACE5E@gnat> Message-ID: <1357772409.96557.YahooMailNeo@web133204.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 23:00:09 +0000 (GMT) From: M0FMT To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" In-Reply-To: <6DDE45A2DAD5431F88116F9E053ACE5E@gnat> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: HI Alan Pete said:----- "I am not complaining its just I wondered why or if there had been a combining or something." I think that's what I said. I am no longer registered with the Yahoo Group because the Blacksheep seemed to be just as active and doing everything I need personally. I think I was expecting too much from the Yahoo. I am sure those using it are happy. I de-registered because of Yahoo groups overload here and the temptation to add unwanted superfluous comment was too strong so best I should disengage. I shot from the hip about the repository because not looked in it lately for reasons stated above. I am sure it now meets my minimum so I retract any criticism implied or otherwise unreservedly. 73 es GL Pete M0FMT IO91UX [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [77.238.189.90 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (m0fmt[at]yahoo.co.uk) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 3dad7246509e3b317974c9d84e795ac1 Subject: Re: LF: Why are threads on here echoed on Yahoo? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="856002529-300962040-1357772409=:96557" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_FONT_BIG, HTML_MESSAGE,TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mtain-dk01.r1000.mx.aol.com ; domain : yahoo.co.uk DKIM : fail x-aol-sid: 3039ac1db40550edf6e83f64 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none --856002529-300962040-1357772409=:96557 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable HI Alan=0A=A0=0APete said:-----=0A"I am not complaining its just I wonder= ed why or if there had been a combining or something."=0A=A0=0AI think th= at's what I said.=0A=A0=0AI am no longer registered with the Yahoo Group be= cause the Blacksheep seemed to be just as active and doing everything I nee= d personally. I think I was expecting too much from the Yahoo.=A0I am sure= =A0those using it are happy. I de-registered because of Yahoo groups overlo= ad here and the temptation to add unwanted superfluous comment was too stro= ng so best=A0I should=A0disengage.=0A=A0=0AI shot from the hip about the re= pository because not looked in it lately for reasons stated above. I am sur= e it now meets my minimum so I retract any criticism implied or otherwise u= nreservedly.=0A=A0=0A73 es GL Pete M0FMT IO91UX=0A=0A=0A>__________________= ______________=0A> From: Alan Melia =0A>To: rsgb= _lf_group@blacksheep.org =0A>Sent: Wednesday, 9 January 2013, 17:39=0A>Subj= ect: Re: LF: Why are threads on here echoed on Yahoo?=0A> =0A>=0A> =0A>Hi = Pete that is the first report of any problems =0Awith the Yahoo group, as i= t is set up virtually the same way as the softrock =0Agroup I am keen to kn= ow what the difference is. There are not a lot of options =0Aavailable, the= way it deals with attachments is possibly the most "obvious" and =0Athat w= as set up to the users choice. =0A>=A0 =0A>Alan =0A>G3NYK =0A>=0A>----- Ori= ginal Message ----- =0A>>From: M0FMT =0A>>To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.or= g =0A>>Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 4:04 PM =0A>>Subject: Re: LF: Wh= y are threads on here echoed on Yahoo? =0A>>=0A>> =0A>>Thanks Eddie =0A>>= =A0 =0A>>I was=A0initially in favour of Yahoo but it seems very "clunky" n= ow and the repository not so good as I had hoped. At the time I=A0was mode= lling it on the Softrock Yahoo group that works very well. However in atte= mpt to limit the number of groups here I pulled out but went back the othe= r day for a peek and what did I find my Blacksheep posting. I am not compl= aining its just I wondered why or if there had been a combining or somethi= ng. =0A>>=A0 =0A>>Your comments have answered my question=A0and thanks for = the advice.=0A>> =0A>>73 es GL Pete M0FMT IO91UX=0A>>=0A>>=0A>>>__________= ______________________=0A>>>From: g3zjo =0A>>>To: rsg= b_lf_group@blacksheep.org =0A>>>Sent: Wednesday, 9 January 2013, 14:44=0A>= >>Subject: Re: LF: Why are threads on here echoed on Yahoo?=0A>>>=0A>>>=0A= >>>Good point Pete=0A>>>=0A>>>I tend to post here for sked and comment mess= ages that could be considered clutter on the Yahoo archive, and Yahoo for = monumental announcements and technical advances of benefit for mankind to = be saved for ever, (well maybe not).=0A>>>=0A>>>However stuff does get rep= lied to on here and also echoed by =0A the replying station on Yahoo, so= what you didn't intend to go to Yahoo =0A appears there. Also it can ha= ppen that a personal reply to someone about a =0A Blacksheep post can ga= ther some moss and=A0 get posted on both =0A reflectors.=0A>>>=0A>>>Care= needed.=0A>>>=0A>>>73 Eddie=0A>>>=0A>>>=0A>>>On 09/01/2013 =0A 14:17, M= 0FMT wrote: =0A>>>Hi all =0A>>>>=A0 =0A>>>>You have heard the expression "I= s there an echo in here?". But there seems to be one on the Yahoo LF group= .... why?=0A>>>>=0A>>>> =0A>>>>73 es GL Pete M0FMT IO91UX=0A>>>=0A>>>=0A>>>= =A0 =0A>=0A> --856002529-300962040-1357772409=:96557 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
HI Alan
<= div> 
Pete said:-----
"I am not complaining its just I wondered why or if there had been a = combining or something."
 
<= span>I think that's what I said.
 
=
I am no longer registered with the Yahoo Group because the Black= sheep seemed to be just as active and doing everything I need personally. I= think I was expecting too much from the Yahoo. I am sure those u= sing it are happy. I de-registered because o= f Yahoo groups overload here and the temptation to add unwanted superfluous comment was too strong so best=  I should disengage.
 
I shot from the hip about the repository because not looked in it lately for reasons stated above. I am s= ure it now meets my minimum so I retract any criticism implied= or otherwise unreservedly.
 
73 es GL Pete M0FMT IO91UX
From: Alan Melia <alan.melia@btinternet.com>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sent: Wednesday, 9 January 2013= , 17:39
Subject: Re: L= F: Why are threads on here echoed on Yahoo?

=0A=0A =0A =0A=0A=0A
=0A
Hi Pete that is the first report of any problems =0Awith the Yahoo g= roup, as it is set up virtually the same way as the softrock =0Agroup I am = keen to know what the difference is. There are not a lot of options =0Aavai= lable, the way it deals with attachments is possibly the most "obvious" and= =0Athat was set up to the users choice.
=0A
 
=0A
Alan
=0A
G3NYK=0A
 
=0A
=0A ----- Original Message -----
=0A
From: =0A M0FMT
=0A =0A
= Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 4:04 =0A PM
=0A
= Subject: Re: LF: Why are threads on here =0A echoed on Yahoo?
=0A=

=0A
=0A
Thanks Eddie
=0A
 = ;
=0A
I was initially in =0A favour of Yahoo but it seems very "clunky"= now and the repository not so good as I had hoped. At =0A the time I was modelling it o= n the Softro= ck Yahoo group that works very well. However in =0A attempt to limi= t the number of groups here I pulled out but went back the =0A other day f= or a peek and what did I find my Blacksheep posting. I am not =0A complain= ing its just I wondered why or if there had been a combining or =0A someth= ing.
=0A
 
=0A
Your co= mments have answered my question and thanks for the =0A advice.
=0A
73 es GL Pete M0FMT IO91UX
=0A
=0A
=0A =0A
=0A
From: g3zjo <g3zjo@ps= k31.plus.com>
To: rs= gb_lf_group@blacksheep.org =0A
Sent: Wednesday, 9 January =0A 2013, 14:44
Subject: Re: =0A LF: Why are threads = on here echoed on Yahoo?

=0A
=0A
Good point Pete

I tend to post here for sked and comment me= ssages that could be considered clutter =0A on the Yahoo archive, and Ya= hoo for monumental announcements and technical =0A advances of benefit f= or mankind to be saved for ever, (well maybe =0A not).

However st= uff does get replied to on here and also echoed by =0A the replying stat= ion on Yahoo, so what you didn't intend to go to Yahoo =0A appears there= . Also it can happen that a personal reply to someone about a =0A Blacks= heep post can gather some moss and  get posted on both =0A reflecto= rs.

Care needed.

73 Eddie


On 09/01/2013 =0A 14:= 17, M0FMT wrote: =0A
=0A
=0A
Hi all
=0A
 
=0A
You have = heard the expression "Is there an echo in here?". But =0A there seems = to be one on the Yahoo LF group.... why?

=0A
= 73 es GL Pete M0FMT IO91UX



 
=0A

--856002529-300962040-1357772409=:96557--