Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-me01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id D88F53800008E; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 11:07:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Tsy9Y-0005zQ-J9 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 16:05:20 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Tsy9Y-0005zH-1P for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 16:05:20 +0000 Received: from nm25-vm5.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com ([212.82.109.206]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Tsy9U-0006zS-Sk for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 16:05:18 +0000 Received: from [212.82.105.224] by nm25.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 09 Jan 2013 16:04:53 -0000 Received: from [212.82.108.253] by tm20.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 09 Jan 2013 16:04:51 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1018.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 09 Jan 2013 16:04:51 -0000 X-DKIM-Result: Domain=yahoo.co.uk Result=Good and Known Domain X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 876655.15464.bm@omp1018.mail.ird.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 80670 invoked by uid 60001); 9 Jan 2013 16:04:51 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s1024; t=1357747491; bh=IaMHZZIMwpEMwf01FyvdOCmFoO/Y4Zv58zsj5v2W18U=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=cLinLCkwydW7KlPjYNCTJrAv7PFdr+x7R/KpjxJ0sm9snlYY1+HmHwCKGI2qkVqPbH768JzVS9XchpbddeLPGIMSkABmdYDrtcrzvd7WQDU4Tj0UvDAIvV8IFJwp3K/vlmDcLc2mJSBuWIB+o2MfA+9xnv1vYoEF/ppSyuwxK6I= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=YB4IEz+OCXPVv1KYLBeK1+ZJLFNl2fsk0BL55s3BA/KBwqjTrqufawO+kzb9BWZYiMoo5l4NKInlpHiH/e7VB/XI19Al+zmWlwk3/6MQCXLcWCQJJlTPjVbqUu6r7nJ+j9J7ebIUV7VmHUV/Xao60b/iQb+7rJ9bfRNvbFWfh/I=; X-YMail-OSG: ntfIHdoVM1keLCSfQiKqCNmRgUxOYdDaosoPNBeKWKZ64Wu xTz1qf80HgMbQUxLQWa1Xj3kLRCNWgQaSfxsMGCKQzPw_zjPvOXlSt3WYBPJ S7G45sPzAQUDX.pLvn_C3q8qz4.q5ptzf.Ff4Ew.uOmykksJy.H6HgOeXRTV 8YZOhPxuFLfz92KPC9wNtVekxNz_.jUSG89o4Fu46Tp2z1FGirUcPuKrILZQ xYf8PelD9nuU_GKFhERnosoTMMgxyCiqKWj4U03hhJJ6YwApekuQhMS1l_VH 31nuLQ4HpUi.nUYbxIg.gMg9oEaAyBtDFFdYXymavq1URbQD8LwF9PoOakjT eNQeyFfcoeS9AMMDd4FJjqOvTMXTuivPCRGF7LQmOXRQ.0ehbDCoXHdyX3tJ V4IBRamY_1Tc11huXS5p2TBcD56Guf.GvoYyMHjFqmoqnA6U.SOgWxlvdz4R Kbjnlq.EzyLuwH88lFuxTQbTSBcv2t0fgnhDpEipc5FGt3Q-- Received: from [81.152.199.23] by web133206.mail.ir2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 16:04:51 GMT X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 001.001,VGhhbmtzIEVkZGllCsKgCkkgd2FzwqBpbml0aWFsbHkgaW4gZmF2b3VyIG9mIFlhaG9vIGJ1dCBpdCBzZWVtcyB2ZXJ5ICJjbHVua3kiIG5vdyBhbmQgdGhlIHJlcG9zaXRvcnkgbm90IHNvIGdvb2QgYXMgSSBoYWQgaG9wZWQuIEF0IHRoZSB0aW1lIEnCoHdhcyBtb2RlbGxpbmcgaXQgb24gdGhlIFNvZnRyb2NrIFlhaG9vIGdyb3VwIHRoYXQgd29ya3MgdmVyeSB3ZWxsLiBIb3dldmVyIGluIGF0dGVtcHQgdG8gbGltaXQgdGhlIG51bWJlciBvZiBncm91cHMgaGVyZSBJIHB1bGxlZCBvdXQgYnV0IHdlbnQgYmEBMAEBAQE- X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.130.494 References: <1357741041.84828.YahooMailNeo@web133205.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <50ED8257.8010001@psk31.plus.com> Message-ID: <1357747491.77414.YahooMailNeo@web133206.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 16:04:51 +0000 (GMT) From: M0FMT To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" In-Reply-To: <50ED8257.8010001@psk31.plus.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Thanks Eddie I was initially in favour of Yahoo but it seems very "clunky" now and the repository not so good as I had hoped. At the time I was modelling it on the Softrock Yahoo group that works very well. However in attempt to limit the number of groups here I pulled out but went back the other day for a peek and what did I find my Blacksheep posting. I am not complaining its just I wondered why or if there had been a combining or something. Your comments have answered my question and thanks for the advice. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [212.82.109.206 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (m0fmt[at]yahoo.co.uk) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: b8b011f938af8abc4b241335cabd0691 Subject: Re: LF: Why are threads on here echoed on Yahoo? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="131296447-1639465904-1357747491=:77414" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_FONT_BIG, HTML_MESSAGE,TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mtain-me01.r1000.mx.aol.com ; domain : yahoo.co.uk DKIM : fail x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d608950ed95b10ffe X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none --131296447-1639465904-1357747491=:77414 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks Eddie=0A=A0=0AI was=A0initially in favour of Yahoo but it seems very= "clunky" now and the repository not so good as I had hoped. At the time I= =A0was modelling it on the Softrock Yahoo group that works very well. Howev= er in attempt to limit the number of groups here I pulled out but went back= the other day for a peek and what did I find my Blacksheep posting. I am n= ot complaining its just I wondered why or if there had been a combining or = something.=0A=A0=0AYour comments have answered my question=A0and thanks for= the advice.=0A=0A73 es GL Pete M0FMT IO91UX=0A=0A=0A>_____________________= ___________=0A> From: g3zjo =0A>To: rsgb_lf_group@bla= cksheep.org =0A>Sent: Wednesday, 9 January 2013, 14:44=0A>Subject: Re: LF: = Why are threads on here echoed on Yahoo?=0A> =0A>=0A>Good point Pete=0A>= =0A>I tend to post here for sked and comment messages that could be=0A c= onsidered clutter on the Yahoo archive, and Yahoo for monumental=0A anno= uncements and technical advances of benefit for mankind to be=0A saved f= or ever, (well maybe not).=0A>=0A>However stuff does get replied to on here= and also echoed by the=0A replying station on Yahoo, so what you didn't= intend to go to Yahoo=0A appears there. Also it can happen that a perso= nal reply to someone=0A about a Blacksheep post can gather some moss and= =A0 get posted on both=0A reflectors.=0A>=0A>Care needed.=0A>=0A>73 Eddi= e=0A>=0A>=0A>On 09/01/2013 14:17, M0FMT wrote: =0A>Hi all =0A>>=A0 =0A>>You= have heard the expression "Is there an echo in here?". But there seems to = be one on the Yahoo LF group.... why?=0A>>=0A>> =0A>>73 es GL Pete M0FMT IO= 91UX =0A> =0A>=0A>=A0 --131296447-1639465904-1357747491=:77414 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks Eddie
 
I was initially in favour of Yahoo but it seems very "cl= unky" now and the repository no= t so good as I had hoped. At the time I was modelling it on the Softrock Yahoo group that works ver= y well. However in attempt to limit the number of groups here I pulled out = but went back the other day for a peek and what did I find my Blacksheep po= sting. I am not complaining its just I wondered why or if there had been a = combining or something.
 
Your comments have answered my question and thanks for the advice.
73 es GL = Pete M0FMT IO91UX
= From: g3zjo <g3= zjo@psk31.plus.com>
To:= rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: Re: LF: Why are threads on here echoed on Yahoo= ?

=0A =0A=0A =0A =0A =
=0A Good point Pete
=0A
=0A I tend to post here for sked and comment messages that = could be=0A considered clutter on the Yahoo archive, and Yahoo for monum= ental=0A announcements and technical advances of benefit for mankind to = be=0A saved for ever, (well maybe not).
=0A
=0A However stu= ff does get replied to on here and also echoed by the=0A replying statio= n on Yahoo, so what you didn't intend to go to Yahoo=0A appears there. A= lso it can happen that a personal reply to someone=0A about a Blacksheep= post can gather some moss and  get posted on both=0A reflectors.=0A
=0A Care needed.
=0A
=0A 73 Eddie
=0A =0A
=0A On 09/01/2013 14:17, M0FMT wrote:=0A
=0A
=0A
Hi all
=0A
&= nbsp;
=0A
You have heard the expression "Is there an= echo in=0A here?". But there seems to be one on the Yahoo LF gr= oup....=0A why?
=0A
=0A
=0A =
73 es GL Pete M0= FMT IO91UX
=0A =0A
=0A
=0A
=0A=0A


 
--131296447-1639465904-1357747491=:77414--