Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-md02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 88194380000B7; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 16:26:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TrbEz-0006zS-4B for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 21:25:17 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TrbEy-0006zJ-Az for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 21:25:16 +0000 Received: from nm7.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com ([77.238.189.21]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TrbEu-0006ZP-HL for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 21:25:15 +0000 Received: from [212.82.105.245] by nm7.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Jan 2013 21:24:51 -0000 Received: from [212.82.108.249] by tm17.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Jan 2013 21:24:51 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1014.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Jan 2013 21:24:51 -0000 X-DKIM-Result: Domain=yahoo.co.uk Result=Good and Known Domain X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 155220.52745.bm@omp1014.mail.ird.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 95647 invoked by uid 60001); 5 Jan 2013 21:24:51 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s1024; t=1357421091; bh=dBaZHNdwHpOjlpv+OCbMATN1551JyY8vVO1Zoc+m0+o=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=voxctpTOoaTjPQqPInHG37rc7+Za9RDI8lB7D5lhq8kTui//tDvH35rxj0DVZSyP9S8gwG1dTuCg3cq6n45NzVV3bsAWvA7/bFW0v5v7A8YAzxNf1/qET/YvNjmTF4mOExuZKzMHvWxT10B6STrdGlnB62r480GSERh0DsRi5Cc= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=trN6REH4msXqoTpcwAZRkT/2iuklaMlX4o0yh3rpNtdj7nhGITCWLKbfkl1UR2P3cz3MQFC2poCosCXcvbcD34D4l4twUCVL8QLbNlzn+wD4FcT2nSSxznxIt1wJuLaI5ueAzlOCPy9N2fbfxky4aICzFraxeyP0XBkLFoz0C1c=; X-YMail-OSG: mm6qY0AVM1mbTcP0.EEpmhlTCj9o9Anwcft9s6fGtZq7F5h DAFah_6W94FPHO6bh_nVmV8_F8ImpCglXaQ8AYpRfoZwKnU1W7b6N2ZMYG7p EGf43JgQVUJ_DjOtlv7biJzyr33maKKgq_sc1BHu9pdhetZVyU88XKPTvAzC a36CdpNJGE7VJegcNxmIeETo8bPsrBTZpKVwZ3sgdHe5_hkHW_caksuG8pXg oJDMdEg4FIWMwnLgtyamRxmhcGVT22gwxZghSH25VnXC_w1jNmeXslAn2P0i vycSBEyz7Y86dVwQ9uqlN25kJKmAzNSIRfAsoAyjcWp.nk.jiNo_dE.WQIis kc6N7_jk6mmuaOH6AisVMKQgMbnzpPaIFBflCpCx1aHBw4YToRcbz7xmZlfG FyUA6wUuaKFzyzRKTmAzK5g7RM0EnNg7smd86_twnfE6VoRoiYM0lxbkvdLW 8RGCxyElUqPomQoxVpw4VNeunB5TRn46GpT2tqsn1kPgIutWeq1hb9_5yFKz a4Qh49hiuZgTj7ISpQrs1r80fjSKm1QjQUcCGSTj5R7ilNkCRkyjVh2giGbG QopY_e1eU_MH9dj8pAjVzQ_tjH6Ft98f1o_JyTb30qmlS958SGFWL1faYlJ2 TI.MSqRpPGnxLIUoC2GSuz.tMaU_CD8i8UYjGudxgFJvk_foF3Dji31Ztt4q RJigAGhWlio7XrikX0SurIK.SknTD7d6h.BoIfHKZcG4ujTbllDEv31FuMHp 0Ec4gnwibcyiBAPltwQ-- Received: from [86.155.211.73] by web133203.mail.ir2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 21:24:50 GMT X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 001.001,Um9nZXIgLi4uIE1pa2UgZXMgYWxsCsKgClNvcnJ5Li4uLi4gOm8oCgpSZWdhcmRzIDczIGVzIEdMIGVzIEhOWcKgUGV0ZSBNMEZNVCBJTzkxVVgKCgo.X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KPiBGcm9tOiBSb2dlciBMYXB0aG9ybiA8cm9nZXJsYXB0aG9ybkBnbWFpbC5jb20.Cj5UbzogInJzZ2JfbGZfZ3JvdXBAYmxhY2tzaGVlcC5vcmciIDxyc2diX2xmX2dyb3VwQGJsYWNrc2hlZXAub3JnPiAKPlNlbnQ6IFNhdHVyZGF5LCA1IEphbnVhcnkgMjAxMywgMTk6NDUKPlN1YmplY3Q6IFJlOiABMAEBAQE- X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.129.483 References: <28CB8EF648E7418BB5C2D4802F72C23C@IBM7FFA209F07C> <50E85BC5.17940.19178EA@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com> <50E85F3B.8451.19EFE76@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com> <1357411601.32629.YahooMailNeo@web133202.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1357421090.91926.YahooMailNeo@web133203.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 21:24:50 +0000 (GMT) From: M0FMT To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Roger ... Mike es all Sorry..... :o( Regards 73 es GL es HNY Pete M0FMT IO91UX > > From: Roger Lapthorn >To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" >Sent: Saturday, 5 January 2013, 19:45 >Subject: Re: LF: AM on 472kHz > > >Pete, > >Honestly, is this helpful? > >I have a lot of respect for Mike and others like him, and this sort of attitude is totally uncalled for. > >73s >Roger G3XBM > > > > > > > >On 5 January 2013 18:46, M0FMT wrote: > >Hi Mike >> >>We know the RSGB owns the spectrum and want to control every issue to do with it like they messed up VHF particularly 4m with their policemen making life for anyone without the £5000 pound rig advertised in the RADCOM not welcome if your centre frequency was not with a few cycles on the channel. >> >>Your e-mail to me a while ago about my paltry 50watts on 136, but I never complained about your 1000watts that flattened signals I wanted to listen too on the band. So why do the pigeon whole brigade, with nice neat lists that have have entry numbers, of things that can be done and can't be done the policeman's charter that makes other peoples life a misery with "I'm alright jack" attitude and limits experimentation. These may not be of the PhD variety but are of the self training variety which is the Amateur radio licence variety. >> >>I don't give a toss about the RSGB 's rules and I will use the spectrum within sensible limits how I want and in line with what is in my licence. >> >>You are an RSGB policeman just like the crowd on VHF! clagging the bands with repeaters and all sorts of junk and have the cheek to complain when a real radio amateur wants to do some off the wall tests that with in the acres of empty spectrum on VHF people who you never hear in qso suddenly come up and say you can't do that here it's what your numbered lists policies create. >> >> And now you are doing it on 472/9. Sorry but its bonkers you are creating clones out of radio ops who you don't want to trust with the spectrum but its not your spectrum....... and in any [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [77.238.189.21 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (m0fmt[at]yahoo.co.uk) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: cbf9d9751ac5f32708197d03fa6d8d74 Subject: Re: LF: AM on 472kHz Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="313692494-1433113455-1357421090=:91926" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE, TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mtain-md02.r1000.mx.aol.com ; domain : yahoo.co.uk DKIM : fail x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d605650e89a842b1e X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none --313692494-1433113455-1357421090=:91926 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Roger ... Mike es all=0A=A0=0ASorry..... :o(=0A=0ARegards 73 es GL es HNY= =A0Pete M0FMT IO91UX=0A=0A=0A>________________________________=0A> From: Ro= ger Lapthorn =0A>To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org= " =0A>Sent: Saturday, 5 January 2013, 19:45= =0A>Subject: Re: LF: AM on 472kHz=0A> =0A>=0A>Pete,=0A>=0A>Honestly, is th= is helpful? =0A>=0A>I have a lot of respect for Mike and others like him, a= nd this sort of attitude is totally uncalled for.=0A>=0A>73s=0A>Roger G3XBM= =0A>=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A>On 5 January 2013 18:46, M0FMT wrote:=0A>=0A>Hi Mike=0A>>=A0 =0A>>We know the RSGB owns the spectr= um and want to control every issue to do with it like they messed up VHF pa= rticularly 4m with their policemen making life for anyone without the =A350= 00 pound rig advertised in the RADCOM not welcome if your centre frequency = was not with a few cycles on the channel. =0A>>=A0=0A>>Your e-mail to=A0me = a while ago about my paltry 50watts on 136, =A0but I never complained about= your 1000watts that flattened signals I wanted to listen too on the band. = So why do the pigeon whole brigade, with nice neat lists that have have ent= ry =A0numbers, of things that can be done and can't be done the policeman's= charter that makes other peoples life a misery with "I'm alright jack" att= itude and limits experimentation. These may not be of the PhD variety but a= re of the self training variety which is the Amateur radio licence variety.= =0A>>=A0=0A>>I don't give a toss about the RSGB 's rules and I will use th= e spectrum within sensible limits how I want and in line with what is in my= licence.=0A>>=A0 =0A>>You are an RSGB policeman just like the crowd on VHF= ! clagging the bands with repeaters and all sorts of junk and have the chee= k to complain when a real=A0radio amateur wants to do some off the wall tes= ts that with in the acres of empty spectrum=A0 on VHF people who you never = hear in qso suddenly come up and say you can't do that here it's what your = numbered lists policies create. =0A>>=A0=0A>>=A0And now you are doing it on= 472/9. Sorry but its bonkers you are=A0creating clones out of radio ops wh= o you don't want to trust with the spectrum but its not your spectrum......= . and in any case things have changed in the world and I don't think people= will stand for Diktat as they might have done in the passed. =0A>>=A0=0A>>= So long as us amateur stay inside the band limits and our EIRPs are sensibl= e that is all authority is expecting us to do and what else we do I don't t= hink they care about provided its not mischievous. Also my guess is they wi= ll tolerate the odd transgression without comment unless it is taking the M= ickey out of our contract (the licence). =0A>>=A0=0A>>I would say cool the = Captain Blimp approach and rub along with things and they may not turn out = to be as bad as you think. Alternatively some of us who are fed up with lis= ts with numbers will migrate out of amateur bands and do our own thing like= quite a few are doing, ever listened at the ends of 80m 40m 20m etc there'= s a parallel universe of amateurs, even though getting a licence is a doddl= e these days.... why? =0A>>=A0=0A>>Just get real and rub along with what pe= ople want to do, you will hardly notice a bit of AM, like the RSGB call sig= n isn't it GB3FUN?=0A>>=A0=0A>>And if my electric bill could stand it I wou= ld probably run a KW like you using an old=A0Decca commercial TX with its w= hiskers ever looked at an SDR waterfall? My 5watts tube tx a real threat?= =0A>>=A0=0A>>Mike I won't apologies for the forgoing but I don't want to fa= ll out with anyone=A0however it cannot be a one sided argument and Diktat a= nd toys out the pram is not the way to go, an arm round the shoulder does m= ore than any amount of "Laws" and lets face it no one will be hurt (unless = you put you fingers in that KW PSU you use on 136?). =0A>>=0A>>Best regards= 73 es GL es HNY Pete M0FMT IO91UX=0A>>=0A>> From: Mike Dennison =0A>>>To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org =0A>>>Sent: Saturd= ay, 5 January 2013, 17:13=0A>>>=0A>>>Subject: LF: AM on 472kHz=0A>>> =0A>>= >=0A>>>Making a complete mockery of any attempt to persuade users of =0A>>>= different modes to coexist responsibly, an AM QSO is now going on in =0A>>>= the middle of the band!=0A>>>=0A>>>I give up!=0A>>>=0A>>>Mike, G3XDV=0A>>>= =0A>>>=0A>>>=0A>>>=A0 =0A>=0A>=0A>-- =0A>=A0http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.co= m/=0A>http://www.g3xbm.co.uk/=0A>https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/=0A>= http://qss2.blogspot.com/=0A>=0A> =0A>=0A> --313692494-1433113455-1357421090=:91926 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Roger ... Mike es all=
 
Sorry..... :o(=
 
Regards 73 es GL es HNY Pete M0FMT IO91UX<= br>
From: Roger Lapthorn <rogerlapthorn@gmail.com&= gt;
To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org"= <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Sent: Saturday, 5 January 2013, 19:45
Subject: Re: LF: AM on 472kHz

Pete= ,

Honestly, is this helpful?

I have a lot of respect f= or Mike and others like him, and this sort of attitude is totally uncalled = for.

73s
Roger G3XBM
=0A




On 5 January 2013 18:46, M0FMT <= ;m0fmt@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:<= br>=0A
Hi Mike
 
=0A
We know the RSGB owns = the spectrum and want to control every issue to do with it like they messed= up VHF particularly 4m with their policemen maki= ng life for anyone without the =A35000 pound rig advertised in the RADCOM n= ot welcome if your centre frequency was not with a few cycles on the channe= l.
=0A
 
Your e-mail to&n= bsp;me a while ago about my paltry 50watts on 136,  but I never compla= ined about your 1000watts that flattened signals I wanted to listen too on = the band. So why do the pigeon whole brigade, with nice neat lists that hav= e have entry  numbers, of things that can be done and can't be done th= e policeman's charter that=0A makes other peoples= life a misery with "I'm alright jack" attitude and limits experimentation.= These may not be of the PhD variety but are of t= he self training variety which is the Amateur radio licence variety.=
=0A
 
I don't give a toss about= the RSGB 's rules and I will use the spectrum within sensible limits how I= want and in line with what is in my licence.
 
=0A
You are an RSGB policeman just like the crowd on= VHF! clagging the bands with repeaters and all sorts of junk and have the = cheek to complain when a real radio amateur wants to do some off the w= all tests that with in the acres of empty spectrum  on VHF people who = you never hear in qso suddenly come up and say you can't do that here it's = what your numbered lists policies create.
=0A
=  
 And now you=0A are doing it on 472/9. Sorry bu= t its bonkers you are creating clones out of radio ops who you don't w= ant to trust with the spectrum but its not your spectrum....... and in any = case things have changed in the world and I don't think people will stand f= or Diktat as they might have done in the passed.
=0A
=  
So long as us amateur stay inside the band li= mits and our EIRPs are sensible that is all authority is expecting us to do= and what else we do I don't think they care abou= t provided its not mischievous. Also my guess is they will tolerate the odd= transgression without comment unless it is taking the Mickey out of our co= ntract (the licence).
=0A
 
I would say cool the Captain Blimp approach and rub along with things an= d they may not turn out to be as bad as you think. Alternatively some of us who are fed up with lists with numb= ers will migrate out of amateur bands and do our own thing like quite a few= are doing, ever listened at the ends of 80m 40m 20m etc there's a parallel universe of amateurs, even though g= etting a licence is a doddle these days.... why?
=0A
=  
Just get real and rub along with what people = want to do, you will hardly notice a bit of AM, like the RSGB call sign isn= 't it GB3FUN?
 
And if m= y electric bill could stand it I would probably r= un a KW like you using an old Decca commercial TX with it= s whiskers ever looked at an SDR waterfall? My 5w= atts tube tx a real=0A threat?
 
Mike I won't apologies for the forgoing = but I don't want to fall out with anyone however it cannot be a one si= ded argument and Diktat and toys out the pram is not the way to go, an arm = round the shoulder does more than any amount of "Laws" and lets face it no = one will be hurt (unless you put you fingers in that KW PSU you use on 136?= ).
=0A
 
Best regards 73 es GL es HNY <= /var>Pete M0FMT IO91UX
=0A
=0A
From: Mike Dennison <mike.dennison@ntlworld.com>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
=0A Sent: Saturday, 5 January 2013, 17:13

Subject: LF:= AM on 472kHz

=0AMaking a complete mockery of any attempt to persuade users of
di= fferent modes to coexist responsibly, an AM QSO is now going on in
the = middle of the band!

I give up!

Mike, G3XDV



&nb= sp;
=0A



--
 http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspo= t.com/
http://www.g3xbm.co.uk/
=0Ahttps://sites.goog= le.com/site/sub9khz/
http://qss2.blogspot.com/

=0A
=0A=


--313692494-1433113455-1357421090=:91926--