MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAMFjj70DNUWTSecPCaRhvr8aZFXtE8Z_xSDxVyOE609iNTS+RQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMFjj70DNUWTSecPCaRhvr8aZFXtE8Z_xSDxVyOE609iNTS+RQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 11:27:26 +0000
Message-ID: <CAO19VgN+hWWiDxv_o1aQGKmmbFJK3shgjWntYn9cG0JgNLkYYA@mail.gmail.com>
From: DAVE PICK <daveyxm@virginmedia.com>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: Re: LF: 137kHz Rules and Regs
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bf0e95c5dd12a04d01944bd
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org


--047d7bf0e95c5dd12a04d01944bd
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Warren
My UK licence shows 0.1357MHz to 0.1378MHz "Secondary on the basis of
non-interference to other services inside or outside the UK" at 1W e.r.p.
with no restrictions on modes or bandwidths. The wording is exactly the
same as for 160 or any other band where the amateur service is not the
primary user.
Note "e.r.p." rather than EIRP.

Dave G3YXM

On 3 December 2012 22:38, Warren Ziegler <wd2xgj@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello the list...
>    The FCC is looking to authorize the 135.7-137.8kHz ham band in the U.S.
> with 1 W EIRP and beyond that possible restrictions on antenna height and
> power - also they may implement some restrictions based on proximity to
> power line carrier (PLC) equipment. Having operated WD2XGJ with up to 4W
> ERP (6.5W EIRP) within 300 meters of a power line with an active PLC, I
> feel that this is overly restrictive.
>
>     Can anyone tell me what the rules and practice are in Europe and also
> Canada?
> I would like to include this info in my response to the FCC.
>
> Tnx!
>
>
> --
> 73 Warren K2ORS
>                 WD2XGJ
>                 WD2XSH/23
>                 WE2XEB/2
>                 WE2XGR/1
>
>
>

--047d7bf0e95c5dd12a04d01944bd
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Warren<br>My UK licence shows 0.1357MHz to 0.1378MHz &quot;Secondary on the=
 basis of non-interference to other services inside or outside the UK&quot;=
 at 1W e.r.p. with no restrictions on modes or bandwidths. The wording is e=
xactly the same as for 160 or any other band where the amateur service is n=
ot the primary user.<br>
Note &quot;e.r.p.&quot; rather than EIRP.<br><br>Dave G3YXM<br><br><div cla=
ss=3D"gmail_quote">On 3 December 2012 22:38, Warren Ziegler <span dir=3D"lt=
r">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:wd2xgj@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">wd2xgj@gmail.c=
om</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hello the list...<div>=A0 =A0The FCC is look=
ing to authorize the 135.7-137.8kHz ham band in the U.S. with 1 W EIRP and =
beyond that possible restrictions on antenna height and power - also they m=
ay implement some restrictions based on proximity to power line carrier (PL=
C) equipment. Having operated WD2XGJ with up to 4W ERP (6.5W EIRP) within 3=
00 meters of a power line with an active PLC, I feel that this is overly re=
strictive.</div>

<div><br></div><div>=A0 =A0 Can anyone tell me what the rules and practice =
are in Europe and also Canada?=A0</div><div>I would like to include this in=
fo in my response to the FCC.</div><div><br></div><div>Tnx!</div><span clas=
s=3D"HOEnZb"><font color=3D"#888888"><div>
<br></div>
<div><div><br></div>-- <br>73 Warren K2ORS<br>=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =
=A0 WD2XGJ <br>=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 WD2XSH/23<br>=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=
 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 WE2XEB/2<br>=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 WE2XGR/1<br><b=
r>=A0<br>
</div>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br>

--047d7bf0e95c5dd12a04d01944bd--