Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mp03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 5BDF2380000A5; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 17:47:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Tk0Vd-0004lI-Az for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 22:47:05 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Tk0Vc-0004l9-Ml for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 22:47:04 +0000 Received: from mail-lb0-f171.google.com ([209.85.217.171]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Tk0Va-0006Vw-6j for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 22:47:03 +0000 Received: by mail-lb0-f171.google.com with SMTP id gf7so3724863lbb.16 for ; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 14:46:41 -0800 (PST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=C44frnwdyl2XZSM3gjZPClQMYdEhiDWDhh61P+EEHm8=; b=KxntubarlPCkW9u5kaXrSHnUaf4dxzfIP37Hg7WgmcpXs9+wV9SLFnHpRNThfTrlcj M5OuqYMnMJaIzii9d0etpvDobXSNM7k7UCOtLDcHMNLWwDv27yVOukCDEK9u+DUNPcVA xxEunVlkxq+S8GeQm//HmD7oxti929OGo7PXdOapRzSa0BLJ9ykMo3O29XSgVOFgIxIV o+SXfn/eyRRfg7Oq2cvjqLWUvjGJWkZ5+WukdXmgd/C2RJPG/lz4PBkVUAVIAJ7LAO1M R06aYj3DdM8JFXiG7BcXzPvFvBHNetsEUuMnBlTKMJMlDA/B7PT8/mwX9qBglQUIKtvb 6/9Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.16.207 with SMTP id i15mr4085617lbd.114.1355611601157; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 14:46:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.21.4 with HTTP; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 14:46:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 17:46:41 -0500 Message-ID: From: Warren Ziegler To: rsgb_lf_group Cc: James Moritz X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Jim, One further question, can I tap the secondary per the original G0MRF design so as to have lower power outputs available by switching taps? Tnx & 73 Warren On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 3:55 PM, James Moritz wrote: [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.217.171 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (wd2xgj[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 1908b49407fc556987226b536cc4bad0 Subject: Re: LF: Re: M0BMU mods to the G0MRF PA Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0401f849f0bd7004d0ebeb39 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mtain-mp03.r1000.mx.aol.com ; domain : gmail.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1dc14750ccfe1f0161 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none --f46d0401f849f0bd7004d0ebeb39 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Jim, One further question, can I tap the secondary per the original G0MRF design so as to have lower power outputs available by switching taps? Tnx & 73 Warren On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 3:55 PM, James Moritz wrote: > Dear Warren, LF Group, > > It's a long time ago now, but... > The multi-stranded winding was mainly used because it is much more flexible > and so easier to wind onto the core. I used a salvaged LOPT core as if it > were a toroid core, i.e. fixing the two core halves together before > threading the wire through the aperture repeatedly to produce the winding. > Producing a compact, even winding that lay snugly on the core using solid > wire was difficult because of the stiffness of the wire. It is desireable > to > make the windings as compact as possible with the minimum amount of space > between the turns in order to reduce the leakage inductance of the > transformer as much as possible. This raises the self-resonant frequency of > the transformer and reduces the amount of RC damping needed to produce a > sensible drain waveform. The multiple strands do probably give some > reduction in losses at 137k, but I expect only marginally. > > Cheers, Jim Moritz > 73 de M0BMU > > > -- 73 Warren K2ORS WD2XGJ WD2XSH/23 WE2XEB/2 WE2XGR/1 --f46d0401f849f0bd7004d0ebeb39 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jim,
=A0 =A0 =A0 One further question, =A0can I tap the secondary per t= he original G0MRF design so as to have lower power outputs available by swi= tching taps?

Tnx & 73 Warren



On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 3:55 PM, James M= oritz <james.moritz@btopenworld.com> wrote:
Dear Warren, LF Group,

It's a long time ago now, but...
The multi-stranded winding was mainly used because it is much more flexible=
and so easier to wind onto the core. I used a salvaged LOPT core as if it were a toroid core, i.e. fixing the two core halves together before
threading the wire through the aperture repeatedly to produce the winding.<= br> Producing a compact, even winding that lay snugly on the core using solid wire was difficult because of the stiffness of the wire. It is desireable t= o
make the windings as compact as possible with the minimum amount of space between the turns in order to reduce the leakage inductance of the
transformer as much as possible. This raises the self-resonant frequency of=
the transformer and reduces the amount of RC damping needed to produce a sensible drain waveform. The multiple strands do probably give some
reduction in losses at 137k, but I expect only marginally.

Cheers, Jim Moritz
73 de M0BMU





--
73 Warren K2= ORS
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 WD2XGJ
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 = =A0 =A0 WD2XSH/23
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 WE2XEB/2
=A0 =A0 = =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 WE2XGR/1

=A0
--f46d0401f849f0bd7004d0ebeb39--