Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-da05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id B79A23800008E; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 17:40:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TfefG-0005Yt-Li for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 22:39:02 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TfefG-0005Yk-1F for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 22:39:02 +0000 Received: from mail-wi0-f171.google.com ([209.85.212.171]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TfefE-0002Ad-8k for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 22:39:00 +0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f171.google.com with SMTP id hn14so179009wib.10 for ; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 14:38:39 -0800 (PST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=GipKho2sePhnuTf/GK20yova35XekL0D1QKfc9Z8dik=; b=k/cymBBZ+vATRT/Ghd9PToaJP0Tu5Ff8ecSiEHBAdusD1pG0Lc+BDpyH6HxREJfLby lv3F4pj2Z1qYhZ3hKNcn9MZ4Rw/V31VhrP4B7EGKcV779gw1nDWM2Sbg3hdm4JlyvyjK iaSdgTmhJDD/dznULr4Ri62TV3m0o95pfjM8FHkDFfXcq6d+SkRosgFIwccpOxCcRvrV LmKuTLcC+j3YVTnf8ueT9u28jvr0I6vD5mJlLgkNke1ry0nix+JLPnv6euZnYRHgpG1V x1gf9pEvKgCSajK0WaD7FXyAlvVpYQzSttceClDuvJ6droYxyKQbGow15DQaK92dYk+m 8OpA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.86.70 with SMTP id n6mr1053568wiz.4.1354574319376; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 14:38:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.16.132 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 14:38:38 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 17:38:38 -0500 Message-ID: From: Warren Ziegler To: rsgb_lf_group X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello the list... The FCC is looking to authorize the 135.7-137.8kHz ham band in the U.S. with 1 W EIRP and beyond that possible restrictions on antenna height and power - also they may implement some restrictions based on proximity to power line carrier (PLC) equipment. Having operated WD2XGJ with up to 4W ERP (6.5W EIRP) within 300 meters of a power line with an active PLC, I feel that this is overly restrictive. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.212.171 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (wd2xgj[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: c0336009bd9bab526ca27d297ea7579a Subject: LF: 137kHz Rules and Regs Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d044286d420d95a04cffa692e X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mtain-da05.r1000.mx.aol.com ; domain : gmail.com DKIM : fail x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d404d50bd2a484b41 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none --f46d044286d420d95a04cffa692e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hello the list... The FCC is looking to authorize the 135.7-137.8kHz ham band in the U.S. with 1 W EIRP and beyond that possible restrictions on antenna height and power - also they may implement some restrictions based on proximity to power line carrier (PLC) equipment. Having operated WD2XGJ with up to 4W ERP (6.5W EIRP) within 300 meters of a power line with an active PLC, I feel that this is overly restrictive. Can anyone tell me what the rules and practice are in Europe and also Canada? I would like to include this info in my response to the FCC. Tnx! -- 73 Warren K2ORS WD2XGJ WD2XSH/23 WE2XEB/2 WE2XGR/1 --f46d044286d420d95a04cffa692e Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello the list...
=A0 =A0The FCC is looking to authorize the 135.7-137.= 8kHz ham band in the U.S. with 1 W EIRP and beyond that possible restrictio= ns on antenna height and power - also they may implement some restrictions = based on proximity to power line carrier (PLC) equipment. Having operated W= D2XGJ with up to 4W ERP (6.5W EIRP) within 300 meters of a power line with = an active PLC, I feel that this is overly restrictive.

=A0 =A0 Can anyone tell me what the rules and practice = are in Europe and also Canada?=A0
I would like to include this in= fo in my response to the FCC.

Tnx!

<= /div>

--
73 Warren K2ORS
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 = =A0 WD2XGJ
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 WD2XSH/23
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0= =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 WE2XEB/2
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 WE2XGR/1
=A0
--f46d044286d420d95a04cffa692e--