MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <50D319C0.9050604@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
References: <001e01cddea6$9598aa00$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
	<50D2FB08.3000704@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
	<003401cddea9$2d337a00$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
	<50D308C8.7090202@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
	<50D314FF.8060504@psk31.plus.com>
	<50D319C0.9050604@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 14:22:11 +0000
Message-ID: <CAHAQVWOGKWT0=3M32d87TG_06Q-mmw6zVPssA1bzpUShDvou=A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Roger Lapthorn <rogerlapthorn@gmail.com>
To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Subject: Re: LF: NOV 472
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015174c33d6eb3fb204d149740d
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org


--0015174c33d6eb3fb204d149740d
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Well, assuming that my NoV date details are correct and it is indeed valid
from today, as it states in the NoV, I've started on the new band in WSPR
and got my first reports from *PA3ABK/47* - thank you.

My 10mW ERP is unlikely to impact the end the world supposedly due
tomorrow.  Besides, I want to have one last fling.

Incidentally, I applied to OFCOM to renew my 9kHz NoV nearly 2 months ago
and am *still* waiting to even get an acknowledgement that it is being
processed.

73s
Roger G3XBM















On 20 December 2012 13:59, Stefan Sch=E4fer <
Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> wrote:

> **
> Hi Eddie,
>
> Maybe you'll get the two missed NOVs later. With 3 NOVs in hand you may b=
e
> allowed to run 3x the ERP?
>
> Congrats to all who received the NOV. Hope to see you on the band in the
> evening. (We have a xmas party (the 3rd) in the working group soon, so i
> will drink a lot. But it should be still fine for CW at usual speeds :-) =
).
>
> 73, Stefan
>
> Am 20.12.2012 14:39, schrieb g3zjo:
>
> Hi Stefan
>
> I bet there was no confusion over dates with your notifications, I bet th=
e
> UK makes you smile.
>
> I applied yesterday before the link went down and actually applied twice
> because the Submit Application button returned a message 'you have decide=
d
> to save as a PDF'. The second submission said 'Application Rejected, NOV
> already applied for for this call sign'. However I received no NOV so I
> have just applied for the third time, no rejection as duplicate /
> triplicate and the NOV has arrived. Third time lucky.
>
> The dating is ambiguous, and contradicts the Ofcom announcement.
>
> Date of issue of this Variation: 20 December 2012
> Date of expiry of this Variation: 20 December 2017
>
> But I must agree with Mal if the variation is issued today and expires on
> 20th Dec 2017 it would seem to be valid as of now, if they have decided t=
o
> give a little early pressy why don't they say so.
>
>
> 73 Eddie G3ZJO
>
>


--=20
 http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
http://www.g3xbm.co.uk
https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/
http://qss2.blogspot.com/

--0015174c33d6eb3fb204d149740d
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div>Well, assuming that my NoV date details are correct a=
nd it is indeed valid from today, as it states in the NoV, I&#39;ve started=
 on the new band in WSPR and got my first reports from <b>PA3ABK/47</b> - t=
hank you. <br>
<br></div><div>My 10mW ERP is unlikely to impact the end the world supposed=
ly due tomorrow.=A0 Besides, I want to have one last fling.<br><br></div><d=
iv>Incidentally, I applied to OFCOM to renew my 9kHz NoV nearly 2 months ag=
o and am <u>still</u> waiting to even get an acknowledgement that it is bei=
ng processed.<br>
<br></div><div>73s<br></div><div>Roger G3XBM<br></div><div><br><table><tbod=
y><tr><td align=3D"right"><br></td><td align=3D"left"><br></td><td align=3D=
"right"><br></td><td align=3D"right"><br></td><td align=3D"right"><br></td>=
<td align=3D"left">
<br></td><td align=3D"right"><br></td><td align=3D"left"><br></td><td align=
=3D"left"><br></td><td align=3D"right"><br></td><td align=3D"right"><br></t=
d></tr></tbody></table><br></div></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><br><=
div class=3D"gmail_quote">
On 20 December 2012 13:59, Stefan Sch=E4fer <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=
=3D"mailto:Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de" target=3D"_blank">Stefan.=
Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=
=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padd=
ing-left:1ex">
<u></u>


 =20

<div bgcolor=3D"#ffffff" text=3D"#000000">
Hi Eddie, <br>
<br>
Maybe you&#39;ll get the two missed NOVs later. With 3 NOVs in hand you may
be allowed to run 3x the ERP?<br>
<br>
Congrats to all who received the NOV. Hope to see you on the band in
the evening. (We have a xmas party (the 3rd) in the working group soon,
so i will drink a lot. But it should be still fine for CW at usual
speeds :-) ).<br>
<br>
73, Stefan<br>
<br>
Am 20.12.2012 14:39, schrieb g3zjo:
<div class=3D"im"><blockquote type=3D"cite">
 =20
Hi Stefan<br>
  <br>
I bet there was no confusion over dates with your notifications, I bet
the UK makes you smile.<br>
  <br>
I applied yesterday before the link went down and actually applied
twice because the Submit Application button returned a message &#39;you
have decided to save as a PDF&#39;. The second submission said &#39;Applica=
tion
Rejected, NOV already applied for for this call sign&#39;. However I
received no NOV so I have just applied for the third time, no rejection
as duplicate / triplicate and the NOV has arrived. Third time lucky.<br>
  <br>
The dating is ambiguous, and contradicts the Ofcom announcement.<br>
=A0<br>
Date of issue of this Variation: 20 December 2012<br>
Date of expiry of this Variation: 20 December 2017<br>
  <br>
But I must agree with Mal if the variation is issued today and expires
on 20th Dec 2017 it would seem to be valid as of now, if they have
decided to give a little early pressy why don&#39;t they say so.<br>
  <br>
  <br>
73 Eddie G3ZJO<br>
</blockquote>
</div></div>

</blockquote></div><br><br clear=3D"all"><br>-- <br>=A0<a href=3D"http://g3=
xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/">http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/</a><br><a href=3D"htt=
p://www.g3xbm.co.uk">http://www.g3xbm.co.uk</a><br><a href=3D"https://sites=
.google.com/site/sub9khz/">https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/</a><br>
<a href=3D"http://qss2.blogspot.com/">http://qss2.blogspot.com/</a><br><br>
</div>

--0015174c33d6eb3fb204d149740d--