Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-ma06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 2527E38000084; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 09:44:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TlhKe-0002Do-2e for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 14:42:44 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TlhKd-0002Dd-GF for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 14:42:43 +0000 Received: from mail-bk0-f43.google.com ([209.85.214.43]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TlhKJ-00071b-4N for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 14:42:42 +0000 Received: by mail-bk0-f43.google.com with SMTP id jf20so1762348bkc.30 for ; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 06:41:51 -0800 (PST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=9mjTSt5NAX8kfAPCkKBrRcSRg63AWPKZIPzaysafEHw=; b=u3DH6hC4VRxdf5zw4Bamfvrsm/bkgiddaEKEE0BfAdtN8ZpKiEBB5KUYyF8a/8Wd2/ upDF7N1KOUVBugjg1jVFrv2vrPxqid6Im/qdlFNEwHDGR7er0YUzGbG5l7gtjoq9W16t KvXGguFCSLTRzn8pNP5d+SlZed09efO0J1NNk3uU1JMfJrsJ8c7PsVvE8nerdPo/cDda dz7AAP/jqVBbSLqGEpjbpajkf/GlZ6kWujCpxxY2XN9mafXOYMlvpKWpRIE+VAmQ1pO4 ZtF71UlvIsrS0bYQU7nSoe1AoqiLISWwtBb1AX6XPDvlmq4FJT2vWYVKKqJ3CWASh+ok yzlA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.149.12 with SMTP id r12mr4688688bkv.30.1356014511779; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 06:41:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.225.72 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 06:41:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <001e01cddea6$9598aa00$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <50D2FB08.3000704@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <003401cddea9$2d337a00$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <50D308C8.7090202@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <50D314FF.8060504@psk31.plus.com> <50D319C0.9050604@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 14:41:51 +0000 Message-ID: From: Roger Lapthorn To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Mal. calling you on CW but I'm too weak as you are sending QRZ? 73s Roger G3XBM On 20 December 2012 14:22, Roger Lapthorn wrote: [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.214.43 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rogerlapthorn[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 6ae5fe68d6708d1e4a9cbdf0f0af43e5 Subject: Re: LF: NOV 472 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175d684e48f08604d149bbf9 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30, HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNSAFE,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY, TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mtain-ma06.r1000.mx.aol.com ; domain : gmail.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d600e50d32430527b X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none --0015175d684e48f08604d149bbf9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mal. calling you on CW but I'm too weak as you are sending QRZ? 73s Roger G3XBM On 20 December 2012 14:22, Roger Lapthorn wrote: > Well, assuming that my NoV date details are correct and it is indeed vali= d > from today, as it states in the NoV, I've started on the new band in WSPR > and got my first reports from *PA3ABK/47* - thank you. > > My 10mW ERP is unlikely to impact the end the world supposedly due > tomorrow. Besides, I want to have one last fling. > > Incidentally, I applied to OFCOM to renew my 9kHz NoV nearly 2 months ago > and am *still* waiting to even get an acknowledgement that it is being > processed. > > 73s > Roger G3XBM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 20 December 2012 13:59, Stefan Sch=E4fer < > Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> wrote: > >> ** >> Hi Eddie, >> >> Maybe you'll get the two missed NOVs later. With 3 NOVs in hand you may >> be allowed to run 3x the ERP? >> >> Congrats to all who received the NOV. Hope to see you on the band in the >> evening. (We have a xmas party (the 3rd) in the working group soon, so i >> will drink a lot. But it should be still fine for CW at usual speeds :-)= ). >> >> 73, Stefan >> >> Am 20.12.2012 14:39, schrieb g3zjo: >> >> Hi Stefan >> >> I bet there was no confusion over dates with your notifications, I bet >> the UK makes you smile. >> >> I applied yesterday before the link went down and actually applied twice >> because the Submit Application button returned a message 'you have decid= ed >> to save as a PDF'. The second submission said 'Application Rejected, NOV >> already applied for for this call sign'. However I received no NOV so I >> have just applied for the third time, no rejection as duplicate / >> triplicate and the NOV has arrived. Third time lucky. >> >> The dating is ambiguous, and contradicts the Ofcom announcement. >> >> Date of issue of this Variation: 20 December 2012 >> Date of expiry of this Variation: 20 December 2017 >> >> But I must agree with Mal if the variation is issued today and expires o= n >> 20th Dec 2017 it would seem to be valid as of now, if they have decided = to >> give a little early pressy why don't they say so. >> >> >> 73 Eddie G3ZJO >> >> > > > -- > http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/ > http://www.g3xbm.co.uk > https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/ > http://qss2.blogspot.com/ > > --=20 http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/ http://www.g3xbm.co.uk https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/ http://qss2.blogspot.com/ --0015175d684e48f08604d149bbf9 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mal. calling you on CW but I'm too weak as y= ou are sending QRZ?

73s
Roger G3XBM


On 20 December 2012 1= 4:22, Roger Lapthorn <rogerlapthorn@gmail.com> wrote:<= br>
Well, assuming that my= NoV date details are correct and it is indeed valid from today, as it stat= es in the NoV, I've started on the new band in WSPR and got my first re= ports from PA3ABK/47 - thank you.

My 10mW ERP is unlikely to impact the end the world supposed= ly due tomorrow.=A0 Besides, I want to have one last fling.

Incidentally, I applied to OFCOM to renew my 9kHz NoV nearly 2 months ag= o and am still waiting to even get an acknowledgement that it is bei= ng processed.

73s
Roger G3XBM

=














On 20 December 2012 13:59, Stefan Sch=E4fer <Stefan.= Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> wrote:
=20
Hi Eddie,

Maybe you'll get the two missed NOVs later. With 3 NOVs in hand you may be allowed to run 3x the ERP?

Congrats to all who received the NOV. Hope to see you on the band in the evening. (We have a xmas party (the 3rd) in the working group soon, so i will drink a lot. But it should be still fine for CW at usual speeds :-) ).

73, Stefan

Am 20.12.2012 14:39, schrieb g3zjo:
=20 Hi Stefan

I bet there was no confusion over dates with your notifications, I bet the UK makes you smile.

I applied yesterday before the link went down and actually applied twice because the Submit Application button returned a message 'you have decided to save as a PDF'. The second submission said 'Applica= tion Rejected, NOV already applied for for this call sign'. However I received no NOV so I have just applied for the third time, no rejection as duplicate / triplicate and the NOV has arrived. Third time lucky.

The dating is ambiguous, and contradicts the Ofcom announcement.
=A0
Date of issue of this Variation: 20 December 2012
Date of expiry of this Variation: 20 December 2017

But I must agree with Mal if the variation is issued today and expires on 20th Dec 2017 it would seem to be valid as of now, if they have decided to give a little early pressy why don't they say so.


73 Eddie G3ZJO



--
=A0http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
http://www.g3xbm.co.uk
https:= //sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/
http://qss2.blogspo= t.com/




--
=A0http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
http://www.g3xbm.co.uk
https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/
http://qss2.blogspot.com/

--0015175d684e48f08604d149bbf9--