Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mi01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 7C3D638000090; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 11:20:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Tli6P-00033O-Ct for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 15:32:05 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Tli6O-00033D-S8 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 15:32:04 +0000 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.10]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Tli6M-0007I8-Vf; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 15:32:03 +0000 Received: from [10.70.57.47] (ip-109-84-0-47.web.vodafone.de [109.84.0.47]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrbap3) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MXH2D-1TZNkH1JXp-00Wotu; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 16:31:42 +0100 References: <008501cddeae$fa913af0$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <00ab01cddeb9$496defb0$dc49cf10$@com> <00cd01cddec1$6e7ca7d0$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> In-Reply-To: <00cd01cddec1$6e7ca7d0$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Message-Id: Cc: "" X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (9A405) From: Holger 'Geri' DK8KW DI2BO W1KW Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 16:31:37 +0100 To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:pjY8TA3yACjJqB9SuuTdlmrndU4iEljqSBLRErs1wE/ FETLADvx0tkRoyGvb0f+AR2lQbPPi7KU+wbdA6XbUv97uyIiOG 35ZHMcbx/k7s1PaTBf6z9z8D2duFnx1s2HNDF+qBDhOfcHsbff 5ByAb7g6y+SfZB5N6z7YjFImJvazr9lbhhwIY4+HDLWJqpLj+Z E91hqHEYVo9KDMih0K3uLCOlhXpeyL6u0C3fSy3x+Rj4CO3ja1 m+2qk1Vg+Wz4pnaQfO9BjdCyC34++pFZnEyi0T+Peh9kJUmqpa Vm3B4dLKsOAkXwdtDkD5RR3ltGgwdb3NsciqD5jRz1HtRvZQuo G5bP0059/JVJ+1CZUr1qyP3cIo6x3z60hAAHSt1bG X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: ... and those of you holding both NoVs, you can do crossband QSOs 472/500 kHz with yourself :) On 20.12.2012, at 15:51, "mal hamilton" wrote: > Terry > There is no advantage for a 500 NOV holder moving to 472 before the 500 permit expires on 31Dec 2012 however since the 472 NOV states clearly the issue date of 20th Dec 2012 - expiry date20th Dec 2017 that indicates to me the NOV starts today 20th Dec 2012. > If it was intended otherwise it would have stated issue date 1st Jan 2013, expiry date 1st Jan 2018 > This is how I and other see it > de mal/g3kev > . > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Terry GW0EZY > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 1:52 PM > Subject: LF: RE: QRV 472.5 > > Hi Mal > > The OFCOM Men in Black will be coming to get you now and confiscate your “apparatus” – nice bit of overtime over Christmas for them! > > I guess thats the problem of clicking on the link direct to the application form and not reading the other bits. But I agree it should have been stated on the NoV. > > It looks like we also have to apply for a new NoV for the additional 5 MHz frequencies. > > 73 Terry GW0EZY > > From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of mal hamilton > Sent: 20 December 2012 12:39 > To: rsgb > Subject: LF: QRV 472.5 > > MF > NOV arrived at 1125 utc and I was ON AIR at 1126 utc MODE CW. I will be active all day for QSO'S > > de MAL/G3KEV > [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [212.227.17.10 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 MIME_QP_LONG_LINE RAW: Quoted-printable line longer than 76 chars X-Scan-Signature: ecf102e6d15c1e466f357d5e6d956ac3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-2DFB8B5C-399C-4CEB-9A84-116B5FA4DD56 Subject: Re: LF: Re: RE: QRV 472.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE, TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d7b8950d33ad14315 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none --Apple-Mail-2DFB8B5C-399C-4CEB-9A84-116B5FA4DD56 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 ... and those of you holding both NoVs, you can do crossband QSOs 472/500 kH= z with yourself :) On 20.12.2012, at 15:51, "mal hamilton" wrote: > Terry > There is no advantage for a 500 NOV holder moving to 472 before the 500 pe= rmit expires on 31Dec 2012 however since the 472 NOV states clearly the issu= e date of 20th Dec 2012 - expiry date20th Dec 2017 that indicates to me the N= OV starts today 20th Dec 2012. > If it was intended otherwise it would have stated issue date 1st Jan 2013,= expiry date 1st Jan 2018 > This is how I and other see it > de mal/g3kev > . > =20 > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Terry GW0EZY > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 1:52 PM > Subject: LF: RE: QRV 472.5 >=20 > Hi Mal > =20 > The OFCOM Men in Black will be coming to get you now and confiscate your =E2= =80=9Capparatus=E2=80=9D =E2=80=93 nice bit of overtime over Christmas for t= hem! > =20 > I guess thats the problem of clicking on the link direct to the applicatio= n form and not reading the other bits. But I agree it should have been state= d on the NoV. > =20 > It looks like we also have to apply for a new NoV for the additional 5 MHz= frequencies. > =20 > 73 Terry GW0EZY =20 > =20 > From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@black= sheep.org] On Behalf Of mal hamilton > Sent: 20 December 2012 12:39 > To: rsgb > Subject: LF: QRV 472.5 > =20 > MF > NOV arrived at 1125 utc and I was ON AIR at 1126 utc MODE CW. I will be ac= tive all day for QSO'S > =20 > de MAL/G3KEV > =20 --Apple-Mail-2DFB8B5C-399C-4CEB-9A84-116B5FA4DD56 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
... and those of you holdi= ng both NoVs, you can do crossband QSOs 472/500 kHz with yourself :)

=

On 20.12.2012, at 15:51, "mal h= amilton" <g3kevmal@talktalk.net<= /a>> wrote:

Terry
There is no advantage for a 500 NOV holder moving t= o 472=20 before the 500 permit expires on 31Dec 2012 however since the 472 NOV states= =20 clearly the issue date of 20th Dec 2012 - expiry date20th Dec 2017 that=20 indicates to me the NOV starts today 20th Dec 2012.
If it was intended otherwise it would have stated i= ssue=20 date 1st Jan 2013, expiry date 1st Jan 2018
This is how I and other see it
de mal/g3kev
.
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 1= :52=20 PM
Subject: LF: RE: QRV 472.5

Hi=20 Mal

 

The=20 OFCOM Men in Black will be coming to get you now and confiscate your=20 =E2=80=9Capparatus=E2=80=9D =E2=80=93 nice bit of overtime over Christmas f= or=20 them!

 

I=20 guess thats the problem of clicking on the link direct to the application f= orm=20 and not reading the other bits. But I agree it should have been stated on t= he=20 NoV.

 

It=20 looks like we also have to apply for a new NoV for the additional 5 MHz=20= frequencies.

 

73=20 Terry GW0EZY  

 

From:=20 owner-rsgb_lf_group@= blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org]=20 On Behalf Of mal hamilton
Sent: 20 December 2012=20 12:39
To: rsgb
Subject: LF: QRV 472.5=20

 

M= F

N= OV arrived=20 at 1125 utc and I was ON AIR at 1126 utc MODE CW. I will be active all day= for=20 QSO'S

 

d= e=20 MAL/G3KEV

 

= --Apple-Mail-2DFB8B5C-399C-4CEB-9A84-116B5FA4DD56--