Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dk05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id F091838000082; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 06:18:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Tm0as-00088o-5g for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 11:16:46 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Tm0ar-00088f-E1 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 11:16:45 +0000 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.187]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Tm0ao-0003cc-Qb; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 11:16:44 +0000 Received: from [10.88.126.182] (ip-109-47-0-77.web.vodafone.de [109.47.0.77]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mreu3) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MWtTj-1TbpLH1a83-00Xvua; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 12:16:21 +0100 References: In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Message-Id: <676C5093-3A16-4528-85CD-46FAD16ADDD3@dk8kw.de> Cc: "" X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (9A405) From: Holger 'Geri' DK8KW DI2BO W1KW Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 12:16:10 +0100 To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:jqv6ARxi20/kuNld72u4C/IDUVjY+iecHouAm5BohND uXRWneoyRe9CUbeFZaw+Fr0wAKKDpK9Oxgv9SvpG8fL0flp8aD 4WCk4ipM/mlEt80FKVgxBFgJKX58pZGJ7PofvEX9Os6sR5PkRo kSPJXlcWdzAtEA8QAk9kq1pcxYsVkfSmqFCQuLRcC6+7BDjI8Z DJ8mMHTcVQGo+yWLHnrbTUEFIVX7qq9iqx7KnJpNtSCTOZ2NTy 368/qS7e1MNA9T5voTtqyrognG41BPqEKpGlL97RnV1S+GAtzj HL9pSPEWmOyhxGjYtnXsly/Z8f8jH9atpriw70QmDtaDqYblgF ZirL3UalQGpcPgU5ql4K83m4gHhbwao4r2aCAzvWX X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Markus and I once had a successful "Slow SSB" QSO on 137 kHz years ago in our German 800 Hz bandwidth limitation. We slowed down normal voice four times, transmitted it over SSB and expanded it again by reversing the process ... using the full 7 kHz would make a fine AM signal, indeed ... perhaps even a low deviation FM signal would do? [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [212.227.126.187 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: f1498eebf16822c5ea85527a90413169 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-782E7F8E-1A8F-42A6-BC15-7EC90BAFDB7F Subject: Re: LF: Re: 477 NOV What Modes ? X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE, TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1db40950d445813174 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none --Apple-Mail-782E7F8E-1A8F-42A6-BC15-7EC90BAFDB7F Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Markus and I once had a successful "Slow SSB" QSO on 137 kHz years ago in ou= r German 800 Hz bandwidth limitation. We slowed down normal voice four times= , transmitted it over SSB and expanded it again by reversing the process ...= using the full 7 kHz would make a fine AM signal, indeed ... perhaps even a= low deviation FM signal would do? Be creative, by 73 Geri, DK8KW On 21.12.2012, at 10:34, "Chris" wrote: > All modes, as per the licence and 136/7 band. > Roger, yes, a couple of us are thinking about some QRP AM across town (sub= ject to non QRM to other locals), and why not? > Some sort of agreed band plan would be helpful ASAP as well. > My two NoVs were dated 20th. December, but it does say 'Date of Issue', wh= ich isn't the same as 'Date of Commencement', 'With Effect From' or whatever= . It was clear from the Ofcom site where the link was that the NoV comes int= o effect on 1st. January. > Vy 73, Chris, G4AYT, Whitstable, Kent. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Graham > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 5:04 PM > Subject: LF: 477 NOV What Modes ? >=20 > Starting 1/1/13 .. but What Modes non listed , only the power ?= ? > =20 > G.. --Apple-Mail-782E7F8E-1A8F-42A6-BC15-7EC90BAFDB7F Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Markus and I once had a successful "Slow SSB" QSO on 137 kHz years ago in our German 800 Hz bandwidth limitation. We slowed down normal voice four times, transmitted it over SSB and expanded it again by reversing the process ... using the full 7 kHz would make a fine AM signal, indeed ... perhaps even a low deviation FM signal would do?

Be creative, by 73

Geri, DK8KW


On 21.12.2012, at 10:34, "Chris" <c.ashby435@btinternet.com> wrote:

All modes, as per the licence and 136/7 band.
Roger, yes, a couple of us are thinking about some QRP AM across town (subject to non QRM to other locals), and why not?
Some sort of agreed band plan would be helpful ASAP as well.
My two NoVs were dated 20th. December, but it does say 'Date of Issue', which isn't the same as 'Date of Commencement', 'With Effect From' or whatever. It was clear from the Ofcom site where the link was that the NoV comes into effect on 1st. January.
Vy 73, Chris, G4AYT, Whitstable, Kent.
----- Original Message -----
From: Graham
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 5:04 PM
Subject: LF: 477 NOV What Modes ?

Starting   1/1/13  .. but     What Modes  non  listed , only   the  power ??
 
G..
--Apple-Mail-782E7F8E-1A8F-42A6-BC15-7EC90BAFDB7F--