Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mj04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 9C9673800009A; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 10:56:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TphiO-0000a5-3c for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 15:55:48 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TphiN-0000Zw-MX for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 15:55:47 +0000 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TphiL-0001xr-Gy for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 15:55:46 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id qBVFtN19008768 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 16:55:23 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id qBVFtNE3000611 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 16:55:23 +0100 Message-ID: <50E1B566.6050002@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 16:55:18 +0100 From: =?windows-1252?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Uwe, Am 31.12.2012 15:14, schrieb uwe-jannsen@kabelmail.de: > > *Hi Stefan,* > > * who irritates you?* > No idea! False decodes are not unusual. 73, Stefan [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 77d68ebd44814a6def4d7158b7296e78 Subject: Re: LF: DLK7FC Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------090007080009010802090402" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d7b9850e1b5ba286b X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------090007080009010802090402 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Uwe, Am 31.12.2012 15:14, schrieb uwe-jannsen@kabelmail.de: > > *Hi Stefan,* > > * who irritates you?* > No idea! False decodes are not unusual. 73, Stefan > * I found the following WSPR sequence:* > > * 2012-12-31 12:46 5V9GFN 0.475617 > -9 -1 AF95 0.5 DK7FC JN49ik 18157 24 * > > *2012-12-31 12:46 I3W > 0.475700 -11 -1 PO32 0.1 DK7FC JN49ik 7281 321* > > *GL* > > *Uwe/dj8wx* > > --------------090007080009010802090402 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay.uni-heidelberg.de id qBVFtN19008768 Hi Uwe,

Am 31.12.2012 15:14, schrieb uwe-jannsen@kabelmail.de:
Hi Stefan,<= /p>

=A0who irritates you?

No idea! False decodes are not unusual.

73, Stefan

=A0I found the following WSPR sequence:

=A02012-12-31 12:46=A0=A05V9GFN=A0=A00.475617=A0=A0 =A0-9=A0=A0-1=A0=A0AF9= 5=A0=A00.5=A0=A0DK7FC=A0=A0JN49ik=A0=A018157=A0=A024=A0 =A0

2012-12-31 12:46=A0=A0I3W=A0= =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 0.475700=A0=A0-11=A0=A0-1=A0=A0PO32=A0=A00.1=A0=A0DK7FC=A0=A0JN4= 9ik=A0=A07281=A0=A0321

GL

Uwe/dj8wx

=A0


--------------090007080009010802090402--