Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-db04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 544EC3800008F; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 11:09:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TpLDV-0005ee-Pc for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 15:54:25 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TpLDV-0005eV-6A for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 15:54:25 +0000 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TpLDT-0007Xs-4a for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 15:54:24 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qBUFsMqi018740 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 16:54:22 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id qBUFsMEt007563 for ; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 16:54:22 +0100 Message-ID: <50E063A9.6050906@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 16:54:17 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <1332136785.219051.1356881586935.JavaMail.ngmail@webmail06.arcor-online.net> In-Reply-To: <1332136785.219051.1356881586935.JavaMail.ngmail@webmail06.arcor-online.net> X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de id qBUFsMqi018740 X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: ... i just extended the time and frequency range, due to high request ;-) BTW i do not use a noiseblanker. The SNR could be a bit better, sometimes, when using the NB but i think the partly very high signal levels would reduce the overall performance. Still testing... [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 7ab87d4d3ea1d9dcb73a78e83fe4d608 Subject: Re: LF: MF-10sec window Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=5.0 tests=NEW_DOMAIN_EXTENSIONS autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d405850e067410426 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none ... i just extended the time and frequency range, due to high request ;-) BTW i do not use a noiseblanker. The SNR could be a bit better,=20 sometimes, when using the NB but i think the partly very high signal=20 levels would reduce the overall performance. Still testing... 73, Stefan Am 30.12.2012 16:33, schrieb dl2hre@arcor.de: > > Yes Stefan i mean that new window on your grabberpage. that looks very = good! may be we all can agree about the QRG-range for the QRSS operation = on MF. tnx for your suggest. > > HNY 73 Edgar DL2HRE JO51tq > > ----- Original Nachricht ---- > Von: Stefan Sch=E4fer > An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Datum: 30.12.2012 15:47 > Betreff: Re: LF: MF-10sec window > > =20 >> Hi Edgar, >> >> I guess you mean my new grabber extension at >> http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_MF_Grabber.html ? = :-) >> >> Yes i saw you transmitting last night and thought it might be useful t= o >> run such a grabber window, just to suggest a range where QRSS could be >> done (i.e. far away from the CW region). This is the 7th SpecLab >> instance on that PC and i expect a temporary CPU overload (and hence >> phase glitches) when running WSPR and all the other stuff. Thus the >> window availability is not 24/7. >> >> QRSS-10 could be a good way to check QSB phenomena, daytime propagatio= n >> over various paths and just to play with some QRP(P)... >> >> 73, Stefan/DK7FC >> >> >> Am 30.12.2012 13:11, schrieb dl2hre@arcor.de: >> =20 >>> nice service! very sensitive! i can see my signal at midday. >>> >>> GL HNY >>> >>> 73 Edgar DL2HRE JO51tq >>> >>> =20 >> >> =20 > =20