Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-me02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 6C22B380000C1; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 12:24:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TodCf-0003c6-PX for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 16:54:37 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TodCf-0003br-C7 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 16:54:37 +0000 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TodCd-0001lx-Ov for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 16:54:36 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id qBSGsE45012907 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 17:54:15 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id qBSGsECH014397 for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 17:54:14 +0100 Message-ID: <50DDCEB1.60804@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 17:54:09 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <50DDB934.9010500@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <24209AAAA8B24C7F9C0336C12024678E@IBM7FFA209F07C> In-Reply-To: <24209AAAA8B24C7F9C0336C12024678E@IBM7FFA209F07C> X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay.uni-heidelberg.de id qBSGsE45012907 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Thanks Chris and Victor, Well, yes, it may be a bit to strong for local QRSS-10 but there may be QSB down to 0 anyway. I hope for Laurence or other DX stns in the west and east... Anyway local reports and spectrograms are apprechiated. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: fc152e7304849b9a177649b85aea9f41 Subject: Re: LF: Re: MF QRSS-10 test Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d608a50ddd5da1869 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Thanks Chris and Victor, Well, yes, it may be a bit to strong for local QRSS-10 but there may be=20 QSB down to 0 anyway. I hope for Laurence or other DX stns in the west=20 and east... Anyway local reports and spectrograms are apprechiated. 73, Stefan Am 28.12.2012 17:24, schrieb Chris: > Hi Stefan, > As I guess you would expect, or at least hope, MASSIVE signal here in=20 > south-east England! > Vy 73, > Chris, G4AYT, Whitstable, Kent, UK, JO01MI. > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stefan Sch=E4fer"=20 > > To: ; "Vasily Savchenko" > Sent: Friday, December 28, 2012 3:22 PM > Subject: LF: MF QRSS-10 test > > >> Dear MF group, >> >> Since a few minutes i'm running a QRSS-10 BEACON on 476.172 kHz. Does=20 >> someone copy my signal? >> >> We often heared a saw the heavy QSB, heavy compared to all other=20 >> bands. We also heared that slow modes are not practical on MF.=20 >> However i never saw a screenshot / spectrogram of a slow mode=20 >> transmission over a long distance. >> >> I would be interested in reports from that beacon, using traditional=20 >> spectrogram captures like in the old LF days ;-) >> >> The beacon will run during this night, most probably. >> >> Best 73, Stefan/DK7FC >> >> >> >