Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mb02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id D634938000096; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 10:54:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Tobly-0002tZ-52 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 15:22:58 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Toblx-0002tQ-Lv for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 15:22:57 +0000 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Toblw-0001Lq-5D for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 15:22:56 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id qBSFMXfW010219 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 28 Dec 2012 16:22:34 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id qBSFMX5n012736; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 16:22:33 +0100 Message-ID: <50DDB934.9010500@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 16:22:28 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org, Vasily Savchenko X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Dear MF group, Since a few minutes i'm running a QRSS-10 BEACON on 476.172 kHz. Does someone copy my signal? We often heared a saw the heavy QSB, heavy compared to all other bands. We also heared that slow modes are not practical on MF. However i never saw a screenshot / spectrogram of a slow mode transmission over a long distance. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 0b2d339ae1d48966556dfb6ad64e2bce Subject: LF: MF QRSS-10 test Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d601650ddc0c27050 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Dear MF group, Since a few minutes i'm running a QRSS-10 BEACON on 476.172 kHz. Does someone copy my signal? We often heared a saw the heavy QSB, heavy compared to all other bands. We also heared that slow modes are not practical on MF. However i never saw a screenshot / spectrogram of a slow mode transmission over a long distance. I would be interested in reports from that beacon, using traditional spectrogram captures like in the old LF days ;-) The beacon will run during this night, most probably. Best 73, Stefan/DK7FC