Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-df05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id CDC4F3800008E; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 06:13:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TmjTg-0003pG-Re for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 11:12:20 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TmjTg-0003p7-61 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 11:12:20 +0000 Received: from mout2.freenet.de ([195.4.92.92]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (UNKNOWN:AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TmjTe-0004Ic-CK for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 11:12:19 +0000 Received: from [195.4.92.142] (helo=mjail2.freenet.de) by mout2.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.76 #1) id 1TmjTJ-0000mh-AN for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 12:11:57 +0100 Received: from localhost ([::1]:53003 helo=mjail2.freenet.de) by mjail2.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (Exim 4.76 #1) id 1TmjTJ-00065Q-4I for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 12:11:57 +0100 Received: from [195.4.92.10] (port=56112 helo=0.mx.freenet.de) by mjail2.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (Exim 4.76 #1) id 1TmjR2-0003z4-GF for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 12:09:36 +0100 Received: from blfd-4db13f3e.pool.mediaways.net ([77.177.63.62]:3272 helo=[192.168.178.22]) by 0.mx.freenet.de with esmtpsa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (TLSv1:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (port 465) (Exim 4.76 #1) id 1TmjR2-0006fL-2u for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 12:09:36 +0100 Message-ID: <50D6E66F.8080703@freenet.de> Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 12:09:35 +0100 From: wolf_dl4yhf User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <1D00CE16DCF340D7BE56065B76EF1A5F@AGB> <50D65418.2040808@freenet.de> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Graham, Yes, in a sense DF0WD's transmission must have sounded like a beacon... callsign repeated multiple times, since after the initial call Fortunato had only copied the 'DF0' but not the rest; and I could only hope not to 'go down in QSB'. He was 579 here so his TX must be a bit stronger. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [195.4.92.92 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (dl4yhf[at]freenet.de) -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: bf9cd6b3d49c805062abf73a1027fea8 Subject: Re: LF: DF0WD 472 cw beacon ? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------030704020105010909080804" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40d950d6e74d71d2 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------030704020105010909080804 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Graham, Yes, in a sense DF0WD's transmission must have sounded like a beacon... callsign repeated multiple times, since after the initial call Fortunato had only copied the 'DF0' but not the rest; and I could only hope not to 'go down in QSB'. He was 579 here so his TX must be a bit stronger. Your signal was between 449 and 569 here, similar QSB as Jan mentioned. How about a "Farewell Fivehundred" party in the coming days ? 73, Wolf Loc. JO42FD . Am 23.12.2012 11:53, schrieb Graham: > Ok Wolf, > Ah , so when is a beacon not a beacon .?.. when its a slow cw > qso ! > I only looked for short time and copied the call two times > Jan had qsb on my signal , but he was ok with me , only 1 or > 2 s points , but 500 seems to have a distinct time X > distance window at these ranges , where signal's peak and fall away > 73 -G.. > --------------030704020105010909080804 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi Graham,

Yes, in a sense DF0WD's transmission must have sounded like a beacon... callsign repeated multiple times, since after the initial call Fortunato had only copied the 'DF0' but not the rest; and I could only hope not to 'go down in QSB'. He was 579 here so his TX must be a bit stronger.

Your signal was between 449 and 569 here, similar QSB as Jan mentioned.

How about a "Farewell Fivehundred" party in the coming days ?

73,
  Wolf
Loc. JO42FD .

Am 23.12.2012 11:53, schrieb Graham:
Ok Wolf,
 
Ah , so  when is a  beacon not  a  beacon .?..  when its a  slow  cw  qso  !
 
I only looked  for short time  and  copied the  call   two  times 
 
Jan had  qsb on my  signal  , but  he was  ok  with  me , only   1  or 2   s points , but  500  seems to  have a distinct   time  X  distance  window at these  ranges , where signal's  peak  and  fall  away
 
73 -G..


--------------030704020105010909080804--