Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dc02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 3E08338000089; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 19:49:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TmZji-0001Tv-PA for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 00:48:14 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TmZji-0001Tm-1c for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 00:48:14 +0000 Received: from mout0.freenet.de ([195.4.92.90]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (UNKNOWN:AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TmZjg-0002cl-6z for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 00:48:12 +0000 Received: from [195.4.92.140] (helo=mjail0.freenet.de) by mout0.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.76 #1) id 1TmZjK-0007rW-Pa for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 01:47:50 +0100 Received: from localhost ([::1]:43164 helo=mjail0.freenet.de) by mjail0.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (Exim 4.76 #1) id 1TmZjK-0004IF-Lf for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 01:47:50 +0100 Received: from [195.4.92.19] (port=46434 helo=9.mx.freenet.de) by mjail0.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (Exim 4.76 #1) id 1TmZgo-0003GP-1Y for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 01:45:14 +0100 Received: from blfd-4db01557.pool.mediaways.net ([77.176.21.87]:2855 helo=[192.168.178.22]) by 9.mx.freenet.de with esmtpsa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (TLSv1:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (port 465) (Exim 4.76 #1) id 1TmZgn-0004xR-MS for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 01:45:13 +0100 Message-ID: <50D65418.2040808@freenet.de> Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 01:45:12 +0100 From: wolf_dl4yhf User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <1D00CE16DCF340D7BE56065B76EF1A5F@AGB> In-Reply-To: <1D00CE16DCF340D7BE56065B76EF1A5F@AGB> X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: No beacon, one of the very last modes I'd ever use on MF. Actually I had heard you (G0NBD) with a strong solid signal earlier with PA3ABK. Had switched to 'really slow cw' (but not QRSS) to work 9H1ES, and thought there may be even more "dx". There wasn't . [...] Content analysis details: (1.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [195.4.92.90 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (dl4yhf[at]freenet.de) -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 1.0 FREEMAIL_REPLY From and body contain different freemails X-Scan-Signature: b14bcaca65d4b584f77d02a84d381cb4 Subject: Re: LF: DF0WD 472 cw beacon ? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------050401030006090208020105" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d408250d655100384 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------050401030006090208020105 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit No beacon, one of the very last modes I'd ever use on MF. Actually I had heard you (G0NBD) with a strong solid signal earlier with PA3ABK. Had switched to 'really slow cw' (but not QRSS) to work 9H1ES, and thought there may be even more "dx". There wasn't . 73, Wolf DL4YHF / DF0WD . Am 23.12.2012 01:10, schrieb Graham: > Ok, no cq when I received df0wd , slow cw , beacon may be , > just called 502/472 2400z no reply , good signal from bia ? > wherever that is ! > 73 -G.. > > *From:* Markus Vester > *Sent:* Saturday, December 22, 2012 11:34 PM > *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > *Subject:* Re: LF: DF0WD 472 cw beacon ? > > Now at 23:32 Wolf has been calling CQ. a while ago > he had mentioned that he was listening 501 to 503 kHz as well. > 73, Markus > > *From:* Graham > *Sent:* Saturday, December 22, 2012 11:55 PM > *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > *Subject:* LF: DF0WD 472 cw beacon ? > > Is DF0WD a 5 wpm CW beacon ? round 472k ? > Graham > G0NBD --------------050401030006090208020105 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
No beacon, one of the very last modes I'd ever use on MF.

Actually I had heard you (G0NBD) with a strong solid signal earlier with PA3ABK.

Had switched to 'really slow cw' (but not QRSS) to work 9H1ES, and thought there may be even more "dx". There wasn't .

73,
   Wolf DL4YHF / DF0WD .

Am 23.12.2012 01:10, schrieb Graham:
Ok,   no cq  when I received   df0wd  , slow  cw  , beacon   may be , just  called 502/472   2400z  no  reply , good  signal from  bia  ? wherever  that  is !
 
73 -G.. 

Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2012 11:34 PM
Subject: Re: LF: DF0WD 472 cw beacon ?

Now at 23:32 Wolf has been calling CQ. a while ago he had mentioned that he was listening 501 to 503 kHz as well.
 
73, Markus

From: Graham
Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2012 11:55 PM
Subject: LF: DF0WD 472 cw beacon ?

Is  DF0WD  a  5  wpm  CW  beacon ?   round 472k ?
 
Graham
G0NBD

--------------050401030006090208020105--