Message-ID: <50D39285.3020107@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 23:34:45 +0100
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= <Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <1TloNM-2uRNkO0@fwd51.t-online.de>
In-Reply-To: <1TloNM-2uRNkO0@fwd51.t-online.de>
Subject: Re: LF: EI6DN received in JN68GN
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org


Hi Ha-Jo,

I noticed some QSO activity near my QRG but i did not hear GI4DP, maybe 
he was down in QSB during the time he called me. I'm using a 250 Hz CW 
filter so it is useful have have a frequency offset below 100 Hz when 
calling me. Obviously this was not the case, at least the QSO took place 
200 to 300 Hz beside my QRG. Usually i have a complete band overview but 
i do not stare the whole time on this spectrogram but writing emails 
like in this moment instead ;-)

73, Stefan/DK7FC

Am 20.12.2012 23:13, schrieb hajo.brandt.dj1zb@t-online.de:
> Dear all.
>
> at 21.38 UTC I heard DK7FC calling cQ, RST579, and was called by GI4DP
> (RST 569) on a nearby frequency, but DK7FC did not notice him.
>
> Then GI4DP had been called by EI6DN and they have had a QSO. But I could
> not hear EI6DN.
>
> Besides this I have noticed a different behaviour of my three receiving
> antennas at MF:
> Around 16.00 UTC my best antenna is a 32 m long horizontal wire; the
> second ranking antenna is my active antenna. My T-Antenna however, 10
> meters high and with a total capacity of 375pF, is almost dead (but I
> cannot found any failure).
>
> At night, however, all three antennas deliver almost equal signals
> showing that the T-antenna is working properly.
>
> At present, 22.13 UTC, DK7FC is still calling CQ.
>
> 73 Ha-Jo, DJ1ZB
>