Message-ID: <50D3373D.7080002@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 16:05:17 +0000
From: John Pumford-Green <gm4slv@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120824 Thunderbird/15.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <010001cddec5$42b69d00$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
In-Reply-To: <010001cddec5$42b69d00$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
Subject: Re: LF: Fw: 5 MHZ NOV RENEWAL
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org


On 20/12/2012 15:18, mal hamilton wrote:
> MF for info I just renewed my 5 Mhz NOV for additional frequencies
> and it states clearly that the NOV ISSUE IS 1st January 2013 and
> expiry 1st January 2018. This makes it clear that any alterations to
> additional frequencies will not commence until the 1st January 2013.
> whereas the 472 NOV clearly states NOV ISSUE is 20th December 2012
> until 20th December 2017 it could not be any clearer.

Hello Mal, LF,

That's just because you applied for your 5MHz NoV AFTER the RSGB fixed 
their NoV issuing machine to change the date to the (correct) one of 1 
Jan 2013.

Both of my new NoVs, for 5MHz and 472kHz state the same : 20 December 
2012, because I applied before they "fixed" their error.

I imagine people applying for a 473kHz NoV later in the day will find 
it's dated January 1 2013 as well.

You seem to have managed to get one wrongly dated one (the MFpne) and 
one correctly dated one (5MHz).

The question now is, will they send out correctly dated ones to all 
those people whove been given incorrect notices?

John
GM4SLV