Message-ID: <50D319C0.9050604@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 14:59:28 +0100
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= <Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <001e01cddea6$9598aa00$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <50D2FB08.3000704@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <003401cddea9$2d337a00$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <50D308C8.7090202@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <50D314FF.8060504@psk31.plus.com>
In-Reply-To: <50D314FF.8060504@psk31.plus.com>
Subject: Re: LF: NOV 472
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------080800040106080908040509"
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------080800040106080908040509
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi Eddie,

Maybe you'll get the two missed NOVs later. With 3 NOVs in hand you may 
be allowed to run 3x the ERP?

Congrats to all who received the NOV. Hope to see you on the band in the 
evening. (We have a xmas party (the 3rd) in the working group soon, so i 
will drink a lot. But it should be still fine for CW at usual speeds :-) ).

73, Stefan

Am 20.12.2012 14:39, schrieb g3zjo:
> Hi Stefan
>
> I bet there was no confusion over dates with your notifications, I bet 
> the UK makes you smile.
>
> I applied yesterday before the link went down and actually applied 
> twice because the Submit Application button returned a message 'you 
> have decided to save as a PDF'. The second submission said 
> 'Application Rejected, NOV already applied for for this call sign'. 
> However I received no NOV so I have just applied for the third time, 
> no rejection as duplicate / triplicate and the NOV has arrived. Third 
> time lucky.
>
> The dating is ambiguous, and contradicts the Ofcom announcement.
>
> Date of issue of this Variation: 20 December 2012
> Date of expiry of this Variation: 20 December 2017
>
> But I must agree with Mal if the variation is issued today and expires 
> on 20th Dec 2017 it would seem to be valid as of now, if they have 
> decided to give a little early pressy why don't they say so.
>
>
> 73 Eddie G3ZJO

--------------080800040106080908040509
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
  <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
 http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Hi Eddie, <br>
<br>
Maybe you'll get the two missed NOVs later. With 3 NOVs in hand you may
be allowed to run 3x the ERP?<br>
<br>
Congrats to all who received the NOV. Hope to see you on the band in
the evening. (We have a xmas party (the 3rd) in the working group soon,
so i will drink a lot. But it should be still fine for CW at usual
speeds :-) ).<br>
<br>
73, Stefan<br>
<br>
Am 20.12.2012 14:39, schrieb g3zjo:
<blockquote cite="mid:50D314FF.8060504@psk31.plus.com" type="cite">
  <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
 http-equiv="Content-Type">
Hi Stefan<br>
  <br>
I bet there was no confusion over dates with your notifications, I bet
the UK makes you smile.<br>
  <br>
I applied yesterday before the link went down and actually applied
twice because the Submit Application button returned a message 'you
have decided to save as a PDF'. The second submission said 'Application
Rejected, NOV already applied for for this call sign'. However I
received no NOV so I have just applied for the third time, no rejection
as duplicate / triplicate and the NOV has arrived. Third time lucky.<br>
  <br>
The dating is ambiguous, and contradicts the Ofcom announcement.<br>
&nbsp;<br>
Date of issue of this Variation: 20 December 2012<br>
Date of expiry of this Variation: 20 December 2017<br>
  <br>
But I must agree with Mal if the variation is issued today and expires
on 20th Dec 2017 it would seem to be valid as of now, if they have
decided to give a little early pressy why don't they say so.<br>
  <br>
  <br>
73 Eddie G3ZJO<br>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>

--------------080800040106080908040509--