Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mc01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 74AEC380000A1; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 06:10:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Tldzr-0005JB-Bu for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 11:09:03 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Tldzq-0005J1-Uk for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 11:09:02 +0000 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Tldzo-0005LI-JD for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 11:09:01 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id qBKB8ZQC001429 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 12:08:35 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id qBKB8Z97032399 for ; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 12:08:35 +0100 Message-ID: <50D2F1AE.5030606@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 12:08:30 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <20121218100332.Horde.2ASBc_rSz0VQ0CNU8mNkBhA@posti.anvianet.fi> <20121218152622.Horde.XfcUIerSz0VQ0G7_VqKUnlA@posti.anvianet.fi> <83EEBFC65ED94B0880138E0637A84E24@AGB> <1355910758.35770.YahooMailNeo@web133201.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <1355911711.86770.YahooMailNeo@web133202.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <001801cddddf$cb3758e0$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <1355938960.81752.YahooMailNeo@web133205.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <6DEA6A69388143C982FD7A3B1340B233@AGB> <1355943205.10939.YahooMailNeo@web133204.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Dimitris, MF, Do you confirm my observation? : Very often is see this dependency: The more effort and time someone spends to build a PA or similar circuit to make it _look_ as perfect as possible, the less time he will spend to _use_ it later, i.e. the time the PA is on the air! [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 7ab87d4d3ea1d9dcb73a78e83fe4d608 Subject: Re: LF: Better picture of the 807 based 500kHz TX Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------080404040907020400090009" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d604950d2f2191c10 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------080404040907020400090009 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Dimitris, MF, Do you confirm my observation? : Very often is see this dependency: The more effort and time someone spends to build a PA or similar circuit to make it _look_ as perfect as possible, the less time he will spend to _use_ it later, i.e. the time the PA is on the air! 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 20.12.2012 04:47, schrieb Dimitrios Tsifakis: > When it comes to CW transmitters, this one takes the cake I think: > > http://fhs-consulting.com/aa1tj/newenglandcodetalker.html > > 73, Dimitris > --------------080404040907020400090009 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Dimitris, MF,

Do you confirm my observation? : Very often is see this dependency: The more effort and time someone spends to build a PA or similar circuit to make it look as perfect as possible, the less time he will spend to use it later, i.e. the time the PA is on the air!

73, Stefan/DK7FC

Am 20.12.2012 04:47, schrieb Dimitrios Tsifakis: 
When it comes to CW transmitters, this one takes the cake I think:

http://fhs-consulting.com/aa1tj/newenglandcodetalker.html

73, Dimitris

--------------080404040907020400090009--