Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mk06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 86123380001E1; Wed, 19 Dec 2012 19:55:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TlUOm-0001NX-Kj for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 00:54:08 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TlUOm-0001NE-5Y for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 00:54:08 +0000 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TlUOk-0003Sa-51 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 00:54:07 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id qBK0rj3L001125 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 01:53:45 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id qBK0ri1L015353 for ; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 01:53:44 +0100 Message-ID: <50D26194.2060404@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 01:53:40 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <50D247F5.3080503@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <50D2534D.3040609@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <50D259B1.7020909@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <50D25F8A.4030809@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: <50D25F8A.4030809@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay.uni-heidelberg.de id qBK0rj3L001125 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Joe, The first 2 sequences are sent. Did you get a decode? Care for accurate time sync! 73, Stefan [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 47a967f57bae6380aac0a0062beb1b4e Subject: Re: LF: Beacon to the west Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d618a50d261ea0132 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Joe, The first 2 sequences are sent. Did you get a decode? Care for accurate=20 time sync! 73, Stefan Am 20.12.2012 01:44, schrieb Stefan Sch=E4fer: > OK, i'll give it a try, 100% TX duty cycle, starting 0:48 UTC on=20 > 137.46 kHz > > 73, Stefan > > Am 20.12.2012 01:29, schrieb jcraig@mun.ca: >> Hi Stefan, >> >> Amazing the noise has disappeared and I can hear the QRN and traces of >> the DCF39 chirps... So please feel free to try WSPR! >> >> 73 >> Joe >> >> On Thu, 20 Dec 2012, Stefan Sch=E4fer wrote: >> >>> Hi Joe, >>> >>> Fine!!! >>> You're not showing in the WSPR map. Still no internet on the LF PC?=20 >>> Would this rise the QRM or what is the reason? >>> >>> If you like we can do a test, either in OP8 or in WSPR, just tell me=20 >>> what you like to try. >>> >>> 73, Stefan >>> >>> Am 20.12.2012 01:13, schrieb jcraig@mun.ca: >>>> Hi G.. and Stefan, >>>> >>>> Thanks to a helpful tip from Joe W1JT, WSPR is now running along >>>> with OP32 (136 kHz USB). Unfortunately there is much noise (perhaps >>>> a SMPS in a neighbours house) and nothing has been decoded so far=20 >>>> tonight. >>>> >>>> 73 >>>> Joe VO1NA >>>> >>>> On Thu, 20 Dec 2012, Stefan Sch=E4fer wrote: >>>> >>>>> I would give it a try io OP8. >>>>> >>>>> Joe/VO1NA, are you reading this? Do we want to give it a try? >>>>> >>>>> 73, Stefan >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Am 20.12.2012 00:31, schrieb Graham: >>>>>> Stef, >>>>>> >>>>>> Thought you would of tried for vo1na , op32 ? condx =20 >>>>>> dont look too good , no decodes last night , but Joe is =20 >>>>>> monitoring again now . >>>>>> >>>>>> Back to vintage data on 502 at the moment , has to be =20 >>>>>> audible from the speaker or no print ! >>>>>> >>>>>> G.. >>>>>> >>>>>> -------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> From: "Stefan Sch=E4fer" >>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 11:04 PM >>>>>> To: >>>>>> Subject: LF: Beacon to the west >>>>>> >>>>>>> LF/MF! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In the moment i'm running a QRSS-60 beacon on 136.172 kHz. A few=20 >>>>>>> turns. If someone is interested... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> During that time i will add a variometer part to the MF loading=20 >>>>>>> coil. The antenna Q requires an adjustable inductance for=20 >>>>>>> optimised operation, which is a bit annoying. Never mind... >>>>>>> This is to prepare QRSS-10 beacon transmissions in the uppar=20 >>>>>>> part of the band. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Wonderful hobby. >>>>>>> BTW tnx for the RTTY thread, which is interesting. There is a=20 >>>>>>> good entertainment on this refelctor at all (these days, again).=20 >>>>>>> Never tried RTTY in my live. But maybe soon :-) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 73, Stefan/DK7FC >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> This electronic communication is governed by the terms and=20 >>>> conditions at >>>> http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/electronic_communications_disclaimer_2= 012.php=20 >>>> >>> >>> >> This electronic communication is governed by the terms and conditions = at >> http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/electronic_communications_disclaimer_201= 2.php=20 >> >> >