Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mb02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id EAFE1380000CD; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 10:54:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Tkcen-0005jt-4h for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 15:31:05 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Tkcem-0005jk-MS for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 15:31:04 +0000 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Tkcek-0005XI-69 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 15:31:03 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qBHFUv4u027607 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 16:31:01 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id qBHFUv4h012974 for ; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 16:30:57 +0100 Message-ID: <50CF3AAC.2090406@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 16:30:52 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: LF, The WSPR focus has been on 630m for a long time now. Can we move it a bit back to LF? There were 2 monitors a hour ago. At least i'm "offering" a LF WSPR signal for those who are interested. Now there are already 5 monitors :-) [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: ddae800c6581715278ab3184b42d46db Subject: LF: LF WSPR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d601650cf405329e3 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none LF, The WSPR focus has been on 630m for a long time now. Can we move it a bit back to LF? There were 2 monitors a hour ago. At least i'm "offering" a LF WSPR signal for those who are interested. Now there are already 5 monitors :-) 73, Stefan/DK7FC