Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mb05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 3EFF1380000BC; Sun, 16 Dec 2012 18:38:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TkNmP-00031Y-Fe for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 16 Dec 2012 23:37:57 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TkNmP-00031L-1q for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 16 Dec 2012 23:37:57 +0000 Received: from mail-wi0-f171.google.com ([209.85.212.171]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TkNmN-0002Qp-BB for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 16 Dec 2012 23:37:55 +0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f171.google.com with SMTP id hn14so1573070wib.10 for ; Sun, 16 Dec 2012 15:37:34 -0800 (PST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ay59aIKkmURAALXwgSUvlSP2CzKaXGl28VhGyP6s260=; b=vJvMWq0UMmUlqZrilztGtDmwE1DPDOMr049QLHmnThGjK786uDJxOjui8qqpc8rwuO Nc+WiRqg6wQ+h1b1Tmh+ruWLuHn+dpWKV2pzccikYQuVzhSkBu4C7ibp8Yw0liCiA8DN dpG8esU8oSLOSfonx0eAeqGcOZRLt7AssJ0hf9fNFQ6wxlf8jLE2jk8fJnmze2A0JLPA wkreUDQ3cagDJjgV4ezprm1k6tacebTuGTyMrDpK2fVmLLF1akDdWXWOlzy7uL0aKBUP cNbrbtaV3BcB8Au+c+RayrSyAVv35kmmD+sd/ZPVQ0A/B621tUZfCRcHYDtHtpBIinPo YkmA== Received: by 10.180.74.20 with SMTP id p20mr12621498wiv.0.1355701054670; Sun, 16 Dec 2012 15:37:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.21.17] ([87.115.110.60]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y3sm8810668wix.6.2012.12.16.15.37.32 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 16 Dec 2012 15:37:33 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <50CE5B39.6070508@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 23:37:29 +0000 From: John Pumford-Green User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <1355567137.54916.YahooMailNeo@web132503.mail.ird.yahoo.com> <50CC91EF.40009@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <007801cddae9$b16bf590$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <24E3873949684F759CEC4334BB9AB293@AGB> In-Reply-To: <24E3873949684F759CEC4334BB9AB293@AGB> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On 15/12/2012 21:21, Graham wrote: > strange compared to the progress made round the 5 meg band Not sure what you mean G. There's no solid info about the requeirement for applications for new NoVs for 5MHz either. There's been no definitive statement that existing NoVs will continue, using the newly published frequencies, or whether (annoyingly) that new applications will be needed by all interested parties. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.212.171 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (gm4slv[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: bb61bee384896e075004ae5ec954ddd2 Subject: Re: LF: UK - MF - LF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mtain-mb05.r1000.mx.aol.com ; domain : gmail.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d601950ce5b7c3b8d X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none On 15/12/2012 21:21, Graham wrote: > strange compared to the progress made round the 5 meg band Not sure what you mean G. There's no solid info about the requeirement for applications for new NoVs for 5MHz either. There's been no definitive statement that existing NoVs will continue, using the newly published frequencies, or whether (annoyingly) that new applications will be needed by all interested parties. Same shambles as the status of the MF allocation. On the MF front - OFCOM publically declared a few weeks ago that their intention was to release the new band to all UK licencees on January 1st (without the need for NoVs) but the joint RSGB/OFCOM announcement this week would indicate that this isn't the case. Good job they don't run a brewery.... John GM4SLV