Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dh03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 6EE8038000096; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 11:35:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Tjugj-0002AW-AX for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 16:34:09 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Tjugi-0002AL-U1 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 16:34:08 +0000 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Tjugh-0005Bp-Be for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 16:34:07 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id qBFGXjUi008915 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 17:33:45 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id qBFGXhvg023908 for ; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 17:33:43 +0100 Message-ID: <50CCA664.5070707@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 17:33:40 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Warren, Am 15.12.2012 17:17, schrieb Warren Ziegler: > [...]The mod calls for a transformer primary winding using 12 strands > of 0.3mm e.c.w. (enamel covered wire). > I assume that the 12 strands are used to improve the Q similar to the > way Litz wire works? Yes, confirm. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: f62c7cf8eeb8e5a327b71719e9bffff1 Subject: Re: LF: M0BMU mods to the G0MRF PA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d411750cca6bd2568 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Warren, Am 15.12.2012 17:17, schrieb Warren Ziegler: > [...]The mod calls for a transformer primary winding using 12 strands > of 0.3mm e.c.w. (enamel covered wire). > I assume that the 12 strands are used to improve the Q similar to the > way Litz wire works? Yes, confirm. > Has anyone done this mod? Has anyone tried alternatives to the > 12 strands of enamel wire? I don't have that PA. But the 12 strands just improve the efficiency a bit. It would work with 10 or 14 strands as well ;-) These are easier to wind than 2mm wire... 73, Stefan > > 73 & tnx Warren K2ORS > > > -- > 73 Warren K2ORS > WD2XGJ > WD2XSH/23 > WE2XEB/2 > WE2XGR/1 > >