Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-db05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 54DD3380000B8; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 10:31:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TjAje-0005rd-Sk for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 15:30:06 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TjAje-0005rU-E2 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 15:30:06 +0000 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TjAjc-0004qe-KT for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 15:30:05 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id qBDFTfYN026357 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 16:29:42 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id qBDFTfkJ008177 for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 16:29:41 +0100 Message-ID: <50C9F460.30504@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 16:29:36 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: MF, Last night there were 5 US stns copying me on 630m in WSPR. There is an interesting difference to LF, regarding times of best SNR. The best SNR ich achieved during the local sunset in the US, not to the time of my local sunrise here in DL. Bests SNRs of the 5 stations are: [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: f7f918e40888a44a70dddae14bd6a529 Subject: LF: Transatlantik WSPR on 630m Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------010108010206070706060800" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d405950c9f4e22f82 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------010108010206070706060800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MF, Last night there were 5 US stns copying me on 630m in WSPR. There is an interesting difference to LF, regarding times of best SNR. The best SNR ich achieved during the local sunset in the US, not to the time of my local sunrise here in DL. Bests SNRs of the 5 stations are: Timestamp Call MHz SNR Drift Grid Pwr Reporter RGrid km az 2012-12-12 23:52 DK7FC 0.475762 -30 0 JN49ik 1 WG2XJM EN91 6633 300 2012-12-12 23:32 DK7FC 0.475763 -25 0 JN49ik 1 WE2XGR/2 FN31ls 6099 295 2012-12-12 23:36 DK7FC 0.475762 -26 0 JN49ik 1 W1VLF FN31ls 6099 295 2012-12-12 23:44 DK7FC 0.475762 -25 0 JN49ik 1 WG2XKA FN33ir 5983 298 2012-12-12 23:12 DK7FC 0.475763 -15 0 JN49ik 1 WD2XSH/17 FN42pb 5927 294 There were no dramatic changes in DST and K index during the night. However we may have to go on with the tests to confirm that observation. 73, Stefan/DK7FC --------------010108010206070706060800 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay.uni-heidelberg.de id qBDFTfYN026357 MF,

Last night there were 5 US stns copying me on 630m in WSPR. There is an interesting difference to LF, regarding times of best SNR. The best SNR ich achieved during the local sunset in the US, not to the time of my local sunrise here in DL.
Bests SNRs of the 5 stations are:

Timestamp Call MHz SNR Drift Grid Pwr Reporter RGrid km az
=A02012-12-12 23:52=A0 =A0DK7FC=A0 =A00.475762=A0 =A0-30=A0 =A00=A0 =A0JN49ik=A0 =A01=A0 =A0WG2XJM=A0 =A0EN91=A0 =A06633=A0 =A0300=A0
=A02012-12-12 23:32=A0 =A0DK7FC=A0 =A00.475763=A0 =A0-25=A0 =A00=A0 =A0JN49ik=A0 =A01=A0 =A0WE2XGR/2=A0 =A0FN31ls=A0 =A06099=A0 =A0295=A0
=A02012-12-12 23:36=A0 =A0DK7FC=A0 =A00.475762=A0 =A0-26=A0 =A00=A0 =A0JN49ik=A0 =A01=A0 =A0W1VLF=A0 =A0FN31ls=A0 =A06099=A0 =A0295=A0
=A02012-12-12 23:44=A0 =A0DK7FC=A0 =A00.475762=A0 =A0-25=A0 =A00=A0 =A0JN49ik=A0 =A01=A0 =A0WG2XKA=A0 =A0FN33ir=A0 =A05983=A0 =A0298=A0
=A02012-12-12 23:12=A0 =A0DK7FC=A0 =A00.475763=A0 =A0-15=A0 =A00=A0 =A0JN49ik=A0 =A01=A0 =A0WD2XSH/17=A0 =A0FN42pb=A0 =A05927=A0 =A0294=A0

There were no dramatic changes in DST and K index during the night. However we may have to go on with the tests to confirm that observation.<= br>
73, Stefan/DK7FC
--------------010108010206070706060800--