Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dg02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id E8F60380000FF; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:50:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Tincy-0006no-SD for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 14:49:40 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Tincy-0006ne-EM for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 14:49:40 +0000 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Tincv-00073h-Na for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 14:49:39 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qBCEnaXh027594 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 15:49:37 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id qBCEnaJx031111 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 15:49:36 +0100 Message-ID: <50C8997B.4080000@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 15:49:31 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?U3RlZmFuIFNjaMOkZmVy?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <50C79936.3060609@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <1355260045.533490.10672.29740@saddam3.rambler.ru> In-Reply-To: <1355260045.533490.10672.29740@saddam3.rambler.ru> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Tnx for the info. Are you running the FETs in a H bridge configuration or do you use 2 of them in parallel against ground? It is a good signal for 90W RF! [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: e4d79cc1e5beb0f7c63f6aa3ce129e10 Subject: Re: LF: Re: TX now on 137778.3 QRSS 120 SM in beacon mode Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------030106040009060804060009" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d410a50c899ae6784 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------030106040009060804060009 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de id qBCEnaXh027594 Tnx for the info. Are you running the FETs in a H bridge configuration or do you use 2 of=20 them in parallel against ground? It is a good signal for 90W RF! 73, GL, Stefan Am 11.12.2012 22:07, schrieb UW8SM: > > Also little visible on your grabber... > > Here: > > Antenna delta loop 85m plus 21m cable. > > 4 X IRF640 12V 8A > > 0.6 A in antenna > > UW8SM > > 11 =D0=B4=D0=B5=D0=BA=D0=B0=D0=B1=D1=80=D1=8F 2012 =D0=B3. 22:39:30= =D0=BF=D0=BE=D0=BB=D1=8C=D0=B7=D0=BE=D0=B2=D0=B0=D1=82=D0=B5=D0=BB=D1=8C= Stefan Sch=C3=A4fer > (Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de) =D0=BD=D0=B0=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1= =81=D0=B0=D0=BB: > > > You are also visible in YO: http://qsl.net/4x1rf/yo/lfgrabber.htm > > What is your TX setup? > > 73, Stefan > --------------030106040009060804060009 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de id qBCEnaXh027594 Tnx for the info.

Are you running the FETs in a H bridge configuration or do you use 2 of them in parallel against ground?

It is a good signal for 90W RF!

73, GL, Stefan

Am 11.12.2012 22:07, schrieb UW8SM:

=C2=A0Also little visible on your grabber...

Here:

Antenna delta loop 85m plus 21m cable.

4 X IRF640 12V 8A

0.6 A in antenna=C2=A0

UW8SM

11 =D0=B4=D0=B5=D0=BA=D0=B0=D0=B1=D1=80=D1=8F 2012 =D0=B3. 22:39:3= 0 =D0=BF=D0=BE=D0=BB=D1=8C=D0=B7=D0=BE=D0=B2=D0=B0=D1=82=D0=B5=D0=BB=D1=8C= Stefan Sch=C3=A4fer (Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de) =D0=BD=D0=B0= =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BB:


You are also visible in YO: http://= qsl.net/4x1rf/yo/lfgrabber.htm

What is your TX setup?

73, Stefan
--------------030106040009060804060009--