Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-da02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 7CAE9380000BC; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 06:34:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TikYa-0005eX-KM for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 11:32:56 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TikYa-0005eO-7B for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 11:32:56 +0000 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TikYX-0005yd-No for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 11:32:55 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qBCBWqOh026707 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 12:32:52 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id qBCBWpDq024893 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 12:32:52 +0100 Message-ID: <50C86B5F.40206@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 12:32:47 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?U3RlZmFuIFNjaMOkZmVy?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <50C78875.5050005@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de id qBCBWqOh026707 X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Toni, Am 12.12.2012 09:23, schrieb traumwandler@sensemail.ch: > [...]I'm sorry to say, but right now you are a big crocodile on the > band ;-) Why sorry? I like to be a crocodile. I have no problem about that :-) There is nothing negative about that. It is the same as having a good RX system and a poor TX system, which applies for much more of the stations available ;-) [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 086f3faad0220c9ae57a7913e711a86d Subject: Re: LF: HB9ASB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d404a50c86bb1737d X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Toni, Am 12.12.2012 09:23, schrieb traumwandler@sensemail.ch: > [...]I'm sorry to say, but right now you are a big crocodile on the=20 > band ;-) Why sorry? I like to be a crocodile. I have no problem about that :-)=20 There is nothing negative about that. It is the same as having a good RX=20 system and a poor TX system, which applies for much more of the stations=20 available ;-) 73, Stefan > 73 de Toni > >> Preferred mode CW and SSB, no digital mode or similar computergames!=20 >> No fake QSO=E2=80=99s!< > > > Am 11.12.2012 20:24, schrieb Stefan Sch=C3=A4fer: >> Toni, >> >> I guess that was you, answering to my call in CW? Sorry, i didn't >> listen to the band in that moment. The peak hold graph also indicates >> that the S/N was to low for CW reception. This must have to do with >> some new QRM in the background. The QRM interacts with the strength of >> HGA22. That's why expect that i will have much better LF reception >> with my new RX concept which is on the plan since a longer time. >> However i'm waiting for the mixer (SBL-3) from the US since several >> weeks. Hopefully soon... >> >> 73, Stefan/DK7FC