Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dl01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id BA70C38000083; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:44:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TiYXw-0008JE-OG for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 22:43:28 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TiYXw-0008J0-9Q for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 22:43:28 +0000 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TiYXu-0003eg-Jv for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 22:43:27 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id qBBMh59W004904 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 23:43:06 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id qBBMh5Oj005731 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 23:43:05 +0100 Message-ID: <50C7B6F4.6030503@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 23:43:00 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <50C7B06A.3010300@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Laurence, Guess the question is already answered ;-) Let us try JT9-30 if the conds are still suitable then, OK? :-) [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: b14bcaca65d4b584f77d02a84d381cb4 Subject: Re: LF: MF WSPR Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------050905060909090303000001" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d4acf50c7b73f124d X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------050905060909090303000001 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Laurence, Guess the question is already answered ;-) Let us try JT9-30 if the conds are still suitable then, OK? :-) 73, Stefan Am 11.12.2012 23:35, schrieb Laurence KL1 X: > Where Stefan? - this 1500Hz above 136kHz or so? > > Transpolar is improving and running mulitple screens - just need to > know what modes to look for beyond ear-hole mode. No one from my > slighly fuddled memory has made it Transpolar on WSPR on 137 - err...I > think. > > IM pretty sure I can run rx OP8, 32, WSJTX 9-10 (still slightly > unstable here but no real time to play to see if its Win8 and WIn 7 > but program says in start up Im running (Qt) Windows version 6.1! ) > and WSPR on the same systems - > > My local home radio station 2Kms away on 1430kHz appears to have > gone off air (Hurrah! in and out Bankruptcy Im told) so not so many spurs. > > Laurence KL 1 X Palmer Alaska > > > > > > Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 23:15:06 +0100 > > From: Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de > > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > > Subject: LF: MF WSPR > > > > MF, > > > > I'm running a WSPR 50% transmission until tomorrow in the afternoon. > > It's frozen outside and the conds look promising. Good chances for TA > > receptions :-) > > > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC > > --------------050905060909090303000001 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Laurence,

Guess the question is already answered ;-)

Let us try JT9-30 if the conds are still suitable then, OK? :-)

73, Stefan

Am 11.12.2012 23:35, schrieb Laurence KL1 X:
Where Stefan? - this 1500Hz above 136kHz or so? 
 
Transpolar is improving and running mulitple screens - just need to know what modes to look for beyond ear-hole mode. No one from my slighly fuddled memory has made it Transpolar on WSPR on 137 - err...I think.

IM pretty sure I can run rx  OP8, 32, WSJTX 9-10 (still slightly unstable here but no real time to play to see if its Win8 and WIn 7  but program says in start up Im running (Qt) Windows version 6.1! ) and WSPR on the same systems -
 
 My local home radio station 2Kms away  on 1430kHz appears to have gone off air (Hurrah! in and out Bankruptcy Im told) so not so many spurs.
 
Laurence KL 1 X Palmer Alaska
 
 
 
 
> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 23:15:06 +0100
> From: Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de
> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
> Subject: LF: MF WSPR
>
> MF,
>
> I'm running a WSPR 50% transmission until tomorrow in the afternoon.
> It's frozen outside and the conds look promising. Good chances for TA
> receptions :-)
>
> 73, Stefan/DK7FC
>
--------------050905060909090303000001--