Message-ID: <50BF3E84.9070800@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 13:31:00 +0100
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= <Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <CAMFjj70DNUWTSecPCaRhvr8aZFXtE8Z_xSDxVyOE609iNTS+RQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAO19VgN+hWWiDxv_o1aQGKmmbFJK3shgjWntYn9cG0JgNLkYYA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAO19VgN+hWWiDxv_o1aQGKmmbFJK3shgjWntYn9cG0JgNLkYYA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: LF: 137kHz Rules and Regs
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------010407070804030907030805"
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------010407070804030907030805
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi Dave,

No restrictions to bandwidths? So you could work in SSB as well?

73, Stefan/DK7FC

Am 05.12.2012 12:27, schrieb DAVE PICK:
> Warren
> My UK licence shows 0.1357MHz to 0.1378MHz "Secondary on the basis of 
> non-interference to other services inside or outside the UK" at 1W 
> e.r.p. with no restrictions on modes or bandwidths. The wording is 
> exactly the same as for 160 or any other band where the amateur 
> service is not the primary user.
> Note "e.r.p." rather than EIRP.
>
> Dave G3YXM
>
> On 3 December 2012 22:38, Warren Ziegler <wd2xgj@gmail.com 
> <mailto:wd2xgj@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hello the list...
>        The FCC is looking to authorize the 135.7-137.8kHz ham band in
>     the U.S. with 1 W EIRP and beyond that possible restrictions on
>     antenna height and power - also they may implement some
>     restrictions based on proximity to power line carrier (PLC)
>     equipment. Having operated WD2XGJ with up to 4W ERP (6.5W EIRP)
>     within 300 meters of a power line with an active PLC, I feel that
>     this is overly restrictive.
>
>         Can anyone tell me what the rules and practice are in Europe
>     and also Canada?
>     I would like to include this info in my response to the FCC.
>
>     Tnx!
>
>
>     -- 
>     73 Warren K2ORS
>                     WD2XGJ
>                     WD2XSH/23
>                     WE2XEB/2
>                     WE2XGR/1
>
>
>

--------------010407070804030907030805
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
  <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
 http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Hi Dave, <br>
<br>
No restrictions to bandwidths? So you could work in SSB as well?<br>
<br>
73, Stefan/DK7FC<br>
<br>
Am 05.12.2012 12:27, schrieb DAVE PICK:
<blockquote
 cite="mid:CAO19VgN+hWWiDxv_o1aQGKmmbFJK3shgjWntYn9cG0JgNLkYYA@mail.gmail.com"
 type="cite">Warren<br>
My UK licence shows 0.1357MHz to 0.1378MHz "Secondary on the basis of
non-interference to other services inside or outside the UK" at 1W
e.r.p. with no restrictions on modes or bandwidths. The wording is
exactly the same as for 160 or any other band where the amateur service
is not the primary user.<br>
Note "e.r.p." rather than EIRP.<br>
  <br>
Dave G3YXM<br>
  <br>
  <div class="gmail_quote">On 3 December 2012 22:38, Warren Ziegler <span
 dir="ltr">&lt;<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:wd2xgj@gmail.com"
 target="_blank">wd2xgj@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
  <blockquote class="gmail_quote"
 style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Hello
the list...
    <div>&nbsp; &nbsp;The FCC is looking to authorize the 135.7-137.8kHz ham band
in the U.S. with 1 W EIRP and beyond that possible restrictions on
antenna height and power - also they may implement some restrictions
based on proximity to power line carrier (PLC) equipment. Having
operated WD2XGJ with up to 4W ERP (6.5W EIRP) within 300 meters of a
power line with an active PLC, I feel that this is overly restrictive.</div>
    <div><br>
    </div>
    <div>&nbsp; &nbsp; Can anyone tell me what the rules and practice are in
Europe and also Canada?&nbsp;</div>
    <div>I would like to include this info in my response to the FCC.</div>
    <div><br>
    </div>
    <div>Tnx!</div>
    <span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">
    <div><br>
    </div>
    <div>
    <div><br>
    </div>
-- <br>
73 Warren K2ORS<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; WD2XGJ <br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; WD2XSH/23<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; WE2XEB/2<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; WE2XGR/1<br>
    <br>
&nbsp;<br>
    </div>
    </font></span></blockquote>
  </div>
  <br>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>

--------------010407070804030907030805--