Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mi02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id B96FA38000082; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 11:48:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TfCh0-0002Og-FE for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 02 Dec 2012 16:46:58 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TfCgz-0002OX-VY for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 02 Dec 2012 16:46:57 +0000 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TfCgy-0005AY-3i for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 02 Dec 2012 16:46:56 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id qB2GkYfu028822 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 17:46:34 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id qB2GkWBR003859 for ; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 17:46:32 +0100 Message-ID: <50BB85E3.4010302@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2012 17:46:27 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <844913113FF64AE3BCDA9DE954EE9F4C@AGB> <50BA9F0F.4060209@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <256F9D1306FB41F5B701266E2BEFFF0B@AGB> <50BAA507.5010600@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <341A12806ED04B3CA23301CEB40A7B99@AGB> In-Reply-To: <341A12806ED04B3CA23301CEB40A7B99@AGB> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi G.., LF, Yes, good point. The path to UA0SNV for example is now in darkness most of the time. However the results are not better than in late august. The same applies for the path to YV7MAE and other DX paths. Another example is the S/N of my night transmissions at W1VD. I remember there were excellent results in april or even may, not much worse than in december, see https://www.dropbox.com/sh/n0vezbcsrhoyvfz/JWLmm0uJZZ?m I also remember LF WSPR (normal, not slow) decodes at W1VD in september but not in november... [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 2ee80849a5d572dbc974bb207a527753 Subject: Re: LF: DK7FC Over night OP32 ? East coast monitors USA ? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------040609050407060601040304" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d7b8a50bb866458a4 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------040609050407060601040304 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi G.., LF, Yes, good point. The path to UA0SNV for example is now in darkness most of the time. However the results are not better than in late august. The same applies for the path to YV7MAE and other DX paths. Another example is the S/N of my night transmissions at W1VD. I remember there were excellent results in april or even may, not much worse than in december, see https://www.dropbox.com/sh/n0vezbcsrhoyvfz/JWLmm0uJZZ?m I also remember LF WSPR (normal, not slow) decodes at W1VD in september but not in november... Looks like the larger the area in darkness is, the higher the circumference and so the probability to propagate QRN from a nearby zone in daylight. Maybe there is such an effect that partly compensates the better propagation. All in all it was a noisy night and this evening is noisy as well, at least here i can see some QRN. 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 02.12.2012 15:15, schrieb Graham: > 136 Odd band Stefan ? > There where more TA and 4X4 decodes in the summer , using OP8 ! > I don't see any on the psk map for last night , W1VD showing , > but nothing listed , unless something has been missed ? > nothing round the Pacific either .. > But a good number of stations running , 3000 + Kms to UK > from Alex R7NT using 60 watts to a 'big loop at 6 dB > over the s/n limit , may of decoded with 15 watts ? .. good > advert for lots of wire ( Not seen Mal post for a while ?) > 73 -G.. > 136K 24 Hrs > > --------------040609050407060601040304 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi G.., LF,

Yes, good point. The path to UA0SNV for example is now in darkness most of the time. However the results are not better than in late august. The same applies for the path to YV7MAE and other DX paths. Another example is the S/N of my night transmissions at W1VD. I remember there were excellent results in april or even may, not much worse than in december, see https://www.dropbox.com/sh/n0vezbcsrhoyvfz/JWLmm0uJZZ?m I also remember LF WSPR (normal, not slow) decodes at W1VD in september but not in november...

Looks like the larger the area in darkness is, the higher the circumference and so the probability to propagate QRN from a nearby zone in daylight. Maybe there is such an effect that partly compensates the better propagation.
All in all it was a noisy night and this evening is noisy as well, at least here i can see some QRN.

73, Stefan/DK7FC


Am 02.12.2012 15:15, schrieb Graham:
136 Odd  band  Stefan ?
 
There where  more  TA and  4X4   decodes in the  summer , using  OP8  !
 
I don't see  any  on the psk map  for  last  night  , W1VD  showing  , but nothing listed  , unless   something  has been  missed  ?   nothing   round the  Pacific  either ..
 
But  a  good  number of  stations  running , 3000 + Kms  to  UK    from  Alex  R7NT   using  60  watts  to a  'big  loop    at   6  dB over the  s/n limit , may of decoded  with   15  watts  ? .. good  advert  for  lots of  wire  ( Not  seen Mal post for a  while ?)
 
73 -G..
 
 
136K  24 Hrs

 

--------------040609050407060601040304--