Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dc05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id E89963800008B; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 08:59:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Tft18-0000yx-U4 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 13:58:34 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Tft18-0000yo-Hn for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 13:58:34 +0000 Received: from mail.foreach.it ([213.254.15.250] helo=for01.foreach.it) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Tft16-0004z2-Ti for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 13:58:33 +0000 Received: by for01.foreach.it (Postfix, from userid 65534) id B990E2853E0; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 14:58:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by for01.foreach.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 754202853D6 for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 14:58:10 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ebirds.it Received: from for01.foreach.it ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (for01.foreach.it [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DlLq24z2GT-d for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 14:58:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from imac2 (host185-41-static.24-87-b.business.telecomitalia.it [87.24.41.185]) by for01.foreach.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EDFA2851C0 for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 14:58:08 +0100 (CET) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 14:57:49 +0100 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org From: Marco IK1ODO -2 In-Reply-To: References: <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FB5C6C9@ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be> <20121204090348.994B5285203@for01.foreach.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20121204135810.754202853D6@for01.foreach.it> X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 213.254.15.250 (mail.foreach.it) used invalid HELO/EHLO for01.foreach.it - verification failed X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: At 14:29 04-12-12, you wrote: >Hi Marco, > Thanks for the note about PLC. I suspect that the utilities here >are using some very old equipment and are reluctant to change it. This >is a shame since many times there have been reports about the >vulnerability of the power grid (mostly concerning hacking), yet there >is a resistance to change. Very odd. > >73 Warren K2ORS [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Scan-Signature: 59677119386dcf9f1872cb454dc1331d Subject: Re: LF: RE: 137kHz Rules and Regs Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d408550be01cd4a3d X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none At 14:29 04-12-12, you wrote: >Hi Marco, > Thanks for the note about PLC. I suspect that the utilities here >are using some very old equipment and are reluctant to change it. This >is a shame since many times there have been reports about the >vulnerability of the power grid (mostly concerning hacking), yet there >is a resistance to change. Very odd. > >73 Warren K2ORS PLC in LW band is used widely in Italy on HV lines, but I never heard of QRM. Very few active stations, however, and all (AFAIK) are far from power lines. Marco IK1ODO / AI4YF