Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mp04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id F31C1380000AC for ; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 18:09:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TloNm-00012V-Uu for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 22:14:26 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TloNm-00012M-Is for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 22:14:26 +0000 Received: from mailout02.t-online.de ([194.25.134.17]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TloNl-0000zq-0I for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 22:14:25 +0000 Received: from fwd51.aul.t-online.de (fwd51.aul.t-online.de ) by mailout02.t-online.de with smtp id 1TloNP-0000js-Oh; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 23:14:03 +0100 Received: from [192.168.2.32] (r9rnjkZQwhyGMG15A+JLe21iopxIDE07DYb8JJ5H-uNGv3aFHHsdnKr31O7-lw+Z0y@[79.237.189.109]) by fwd51.t-online.de with esmtp id 1TloNM-2uRNkO0; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 23:14:00 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 From: hajo.brandt.dj1zb@t-online.de To: "LF Group RSGB" X-Mailer: T-Online eMail 6.08.0003 Date: 20 Dec 2012 22:13 GMT Message-ID: <1TloNM-2uRNkO0@fwd51.t-online.de> X-ID: r9rnjkZQwhyGMG15A+JLe21iopxIDE07DYb8JJ5H-uNGv3aFHHsdnKr31O7-lw+Z0y X-TOI-MSGID: 31a7297d-78bd-4d59-8d82-7d1004eedaba X-RFC2822-Warning: Obsolete format in Date: header X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Dear all. at 21.38 UTC I heard DK7FC calling cQ, RST579, and was called by GI4DP (RST 569) on a nearby frequency, but DK7FC did not notice him. Then GI4DP had been called by EI6DN and they have had a QSO. But I could not hear EI6DN. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [194.25.134.17 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines X-Scan-Signature: 7aa9ad08848e488e22e0ff1d71f4ef1d Subject: LF: EI6DN received in JN68GN Content-Type: Text/Plain; Charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1dc14850d39ac04c97 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Dear all. at 21.38 UTC I heard DK7FC calling cQ, RST579, and was called by GI4DP (RST 569) on a nearby frequency, but DK7FC did not notice him. Then GI4DP had been called by EI6DN and they have had a QSO. But I could not hear EI6DN. Besides this I have noticed a different behaviour of my three receiving antennas at MF: Around 16.00 UTC my best antenna is a 32 m long horizontal wire; the second ranking antenna is my active antenna. My T-Antenna however, 10 meters high and with a total capacity of 375pF, is almost dead (but I cannot found any failure). At night, however, all three antennas deliver almost equal signals showing that the T-antenna is working properly. At present, 22.13 UTC, DK7FC is still calling CQ. 73 Ha-Jo, DJ1ZB