Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dg03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 50C1138000098; Sun, 16 Dec 2012 08:34:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TkEL9-0000KE-1G for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 16 Dec 2012 13:33:11 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TkEL8-0000K5-5T for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 16 Dec 2012 13:33:10 +0000 Received: from nm4-vm0.bt.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com ([212.82.108.93]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TkEL3-0000jy-8K for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 16 Dec 2012 13:33:09 +0000 Received: from [212.82.108.229] by nm4.bt.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 16 Dec 2012 13:32:44 -0000 Received: from [217.12.12.249] by tm2.bt.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 16 Dec 2012 13:32:44 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp820.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 16 Dec 2012 13:32:44 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1355664763; bh=bJ4vWp3z/DnW3ECD8Yi0UwWVnAU/zmiXMbqXcrcRwpY=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=2xkHzW3N+3YdhDEh1oG2V6rpBXcXOIRys8iLE7b39LBKyLRVR7KJIMrSqIBLzHN7gcES8PvTH4Y8aEdv7uLyCOtFoKAh7N/SRTWFlREMYarIqodGOOIxtd/4vjvIsJEnyWDewsAVvJT8kwOKjeZN0RfiyInjggbDciqvTnk1cwk= X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 991415.62483.bm@smtp820.mail.ukl.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: 4jYGVccVM1lcNlXeylkm46upsg46sYmrbGjaA.aD_EER8in hHOX3gEo_9106xNXaxM.afqdz0eQqYb.FLeCyR2sa1eP236hjwPV_8FHmo5E EByWDvlttKZF6NkFr9nkHNitUjiySJsRR8uVqACk3vBAxUy_pwH2STgY1vrF SeNHmL4k1fqUugD9OhOI86l6zvqw.hXqtSpYrI5qk4KGt5NmNixReNUTvlYo 7dkbvoZ8ZNeMTClduWJGFY9tueZgOGc0zIYHKEpM7TrnrjcbUiTHPNYPQ2pT F0L8nnHEEA4DB.6cakiYuxgtukMjHnVm82rUzKOKQe0FRgp3e3srRYcv1m8f PhJWcAE0rtoz_4ZUIwwUZmHe92ZuMWNPGTGy4POQkHF6T4atyjFWNJYioF7u tcHRIW41.jsUwU7Ccvb4FSp0TzSg3JjsHM5ZXq1nJQ3Av6XSMvEDyqouzwiZ 0D_HibjWb7FBpXbJN14brJ2m0b9J2Gc0deFF3dHimPWyG0B8zoXlgXLT1sN. Uep2.D22EVEJqQi3mjuBHwvPLaJ7ryiw3g2uuaryXrtJqDX_JV7kp8H7lRDl g9YB2fTU.zqi4LyW2FpV5etzJ.K4oPqhy5CzP5wuEDilvmm06TTAOPMPcbCO vEWzv5QoNuNmL_kR0_SlWXUTh4pM- X-Yahoo-SMTP: .u8e2g.swBByWKjbpA3lR6Fw.2ZEQrJJpVsTSrpXLCffsPaCEMY- Received: from IBM7FFA209F07C (c.ashby435@86.155.203.214 with login) by smtp820.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 16 Dec 2012 05:32:43 -0800 PST Message-ID: <19E82687D1204A4AA879F294B9F88846@IBM7FFA209F07C> From: "Chris" To: References: <3D18457F879B4ADFA9CDE7CC0E8A1091@JIMLAP2> Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 13:32:46 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: I thought the 'new band' was originally to be unrestricted, i.e. not by NoV, in the UK. I think it's a shame as this will surely reduce occupancy. I will probably stick to 136/7 myself. Chris, G3XIZ - Yes, same here, noise and general rubbish on LF is getting worse each year. Vy 73 and seasons greetings to all, Chris, G4AYT. ----- Original Message ----- From: James Cowburn To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2012 11:27 AM Subject: RE: LF: UK - MF - LF [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [212.82.108.93 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines X-Scan-Signature: 94a3ffcd3903efbf0b2b811b1b1cc0bf Subject: Re: LF: UK - MF - LF Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0015_01CDDB91.D587F390" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.7 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK, FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,HTML_50_60,HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNKNOWN,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mtain-dg03.r1000.mx.aol.com ; domain : btinternet.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d410b50cdcde90692 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0015_01CDDB91.D587F390 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I thought the 'new band' was originally to be unrestricted, i.e. not by = NoV, in the UK. I think it's a shame as this will surely reduce = occupancy. I will probably stick to 136/7 myself. Chris, G3XIZ - Yes, same here, noise and general rubbish on LF is = getting worse each year. Vy 73 and seasons greetings to all, Chris, G4AYT. ----- Original Message -----=20 From: James Cowburn=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2012 11:27 AM Subject: RE: LF: UK - MF - LF Hopefully, it will be a simple webform for exsiting NOV holders. -----Original Message----- From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org = [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Chris Osborn Sent: 15 December 2012 11:00 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: UK - MF - LF Thanks David, Yes I had read that - "Details (re. NOV applications) will be = published soon" As I say - no definitive word. 73 Chris XIZ -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ----- From: David Pratt To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Saturday, 15 December 2012, 10:38 Subject: Re: LF: UK - MF - LF The official word is there, Chris, and has been for some time. All we = know is that our existing SRPs expire and will not be renewed. We have = to re-apply for an NoV. But how we do it remains to be seen. = http://licensing.ofcom.org.uk/radiocommunication-licences/amateur-radio/f= ull-licence-jan-2013/ 73 de David G4DMP In a recent message, Chris Osborn writes > LF/ MF >=20 > I guess there's still no definitive word from OfCom regarding the = new > MF band NOV's (?) > Chris G3XIZ -- + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + | David M Pratt, Kippax, Leeds. | | Website: http://www.g4dmp.co.uk | + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + ------=_NextPart_000_0015_01CDDB91.D587F390 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I thought the 'new band' was originally = to be=20 unrestricted, i.e. not by NoV, in the UK. I think it's a shame as this = will=20 surely reduce occupancy. I will probably stick to 136/7 = myself.
Chris, G3XIZ - Yes, same here, noise = and general=20 rubbish on LF is getting worse each year.
Vy 73 and seasons greetings to all, = Chris,=20 G4AYT.
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 James=20 Cowburn
Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2012 = 11:27=20 AM
Subject: RE: LF: UK - MF - = LF

Hopefully, = it will be=20 a simple webform for exsiting NOV holders.

 

-----Original=20 Message-----
From: = owner-rsgb_lf_group@bl= acksheep.org=20 [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Chris = Osborn
Sent: 15 December 2012 = 11:00
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=
Subject: Re: LF: UK - MF -=20 LF

 

Thanks=20 David,

Yes I had read that - "Details (re. NOV applications) = will be=20 published soon"
As I say - no definitive word.

73
Chris=20 XIZ

 

From: David = Pratt=20 <david@g4dmp.fsnet.co.uk>
To: = rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20
Sent: Saturday, 15 = December=20 2012, 10:38
Subject: Re: LF:=20 UK - MF - LF


The official word is = there, Chris,=20 and has been for some time. All we know is that our existing SRPs = expire and=20 will not be renewed. We have to re-apply for an NoV. But how we do it = remains=20 to be seen.

http://licensing.ofcom.org.uk/radiocommunication-licences= /amateur-radio/full-licence-jan-2013/

73=20 de David G4DMP

In a recent message, Chris Osborn <g3xiz@yahoo.co.uk> = writes
>=20 LF/ MF
>
> I guess there's still no definitive word from = OfCom=20 regarding the new
> MF band NOV's (?)
> Chris=20 G3XIZ

--  + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - +
| David M = Pratt,=20 Kippax, Leeds.  |
| Website: http://www.g4dmp.co.uk |
+ - - - - - - - - - - = - - - - -=20 -=20 +



<= /BODY> ------=_NextPart_000_0015_01CDDB91.D587F390--