Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mj04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 75A30380000C6; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 12:24:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Tm5m3-0002tf-IV for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 16:48:39 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Tm5m2-0002tW-On for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 16:48:38 +0000 Received: from nm14.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com ([77.238.189.67]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Tm5m0-00053Q-Ma for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 16:48:37 +0000 Received: from [77.238.189.51] by nm14.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 21 Dec 2012 16:48:15 -0000 Received: from [212.82.108.252] by tm4.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 21 Dec 2012 16:48:15 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1017.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 21 Dec 2012 16:48:15 -0000 X-DKIM-Result: Domain=yahoo.co.uk Result=Good and Known Domain X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 461860.58092.bm@omp1017.mail.ird.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 12774 invoked by uid 60001); 21 Dec 2012 16:41:35 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s1024; t=1356108095; bh=VrDvRHD4wsJNsc3YVw9j8BsOsDkK2kasPV6lANovBgE=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=s485ROdIMyL7J/oM9LWudymlyYYrbIBrtse3lbTzsJus6Mcc4YVoUHaflDl6rIWV4sL+k964FeBCNE3JQ34csOXpSYXaLAoTE8u9/n75+uhetluEtfQa1NwWtychdDellweIt+IPCrMGJP9PnkCjhl+jKrJzpLlpU1IYsKp59xY= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=hNxypzRGQqhuN48jmulbWXgVNmEYM9vAUA4+7GdswZiegHflGP+vdkNktIqtl4SjJW9bINJR/5G5HdbST6TAUFCtSNlBY1+IWf0Qj4YIrOerMbHCgRYf2w25mxWkkhYfoeOpiobvLxQkN5S3VodpNxXBUm7fpHjU7V8JzY8sWK8=; X-YMail-OSG: bKTd37oVM1mp33uXvZjKOgVFwRPAXq2MvE11wvvpIAKQ1cv rROOObc2T5hPNbpPLPKnSlFmasMGsJy35L3K40v5hXAwO98F2XbANc4tm6H. dK8SiQ.O1FIVQG7Do1Uq.SxCi6m3t7Em5qLc9z2wOdnejcDPPdYgClIionYU tku2vfIh1_ok7gKtEycYnvXMccpGLKNUUA_RbYJT28rF2B7.PrvFLBbAuuQg tAZ1R3bCEP7_gkCiYFsWn23z5aduTZy9gxjaJkyHW.faFLLZg0_TJTv6DU.w UrIN2X2RnOY0tj9Z5CUNLb_sKQOUZH5PiyiJe4AFg.4SmvkBUPT9ovpElqSY tuW7GgUIimbMb7r6NGje.KG9qGASn1_noGCnKQVmD2MFg19prYHVbsJQTluZ VEBXGQ3xmRnn_NlLEVmu9W14BG.w6gO31mfdZ6bA9E_ZQbPdwz0700cXl0uH _GwHySpvauNAjnL3YsskJOW71Ww8X_OTKiIGcSH41nr9pDYdjviM- Received: from [31.51.111.241] by web133201.mail.ir2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 16:41:34 GMT X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 001.001,TWFsIArCoApJIHRoaW5rIHdlIGJlaW5nIGFza2VkIHRvICJQbGF5IHRoZSBnYW1lIiB3aGljaCBJIGZvciBvbmUgaGF2ZSBubyBvYmplY3Rpb24gdG8uCgo3MyBlcyBHTCBQZXRlIE0wRk1UIElPOTFVWAoKCj5fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXwo.IEZyb206IG1hbCBoYW1pbHRvbiA8ZzNrZXZtYWxAdGFsa3RhbGsubmV0Pgo.VG86IHJzZ2IgPHJzZ2JfbGZfZ3JvdXBAYmxhY2tzaGVlcC5vcmc.IAo.U2VudDogRnJpZGF5LCAyMSBEZWNlbWJlciAyMDEyLCAxNToyNQo.U3ViamVjdDogTEYBMAEBAQE- X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.129.483 References: <006001cddf8f$7ae94e00$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> Message-ID: <1356108094.10409.YahooMailNeo@web133201.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 16:41:34 +0000 (GMT) From: M0FMT To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" In-Reply-To: <006001cddf8f$7ae94e00$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Mal I think we being asked to "Play the game" which I for one have no objection to. 73 es GL Pete M0FMT IO91UX > > From: mal hamilton >To: rsgb >Sent: Friday, 21 December 2012, 15:25 >Subject: LF: NOV 472 > > > >MF info >After all the discussion that took place yesterday about a NOV issued for 20th Decemer 2012 until December 2017. Today I applied via the same RSGB website for a NOV which I thought would have the new date of issue 1st January 2013 until 1st January 2018. >This application was REFUSED stating that I had already been issued a NOV. Therefore my conclusion is that my original NOV issued yesterday morning is still current and valid as stated from 20th December 2012 until 20th December 2017. >I expect others will find themselves in the same position. >It now appears that there are two sets of NOV for the 472 - 479 Khz band and likewise for the 5 Mhz band. >I would have thought the easy solution to this problem would be to have stuck to the original NOV issued on 20th December 2012. >this would have avoided any further confusion, especially since there is only a few days to go until 1st January 2013. >Mistakes and misunderstandings do happen between issuing agencies and a simple solution is usually the answer. > >de G3KEV > > > > [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [77.238.189.67 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (m0fmt[at]yahoo.co.uk) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 1e15d6d6179985f133b43d42d658878a Subject: Re: LF: NOV 472 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="1982344905-261123555-1356108094=:10409" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE, TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mtain-mj04.r1000.mx.aol.com ; domain : yahoo.co.uk DKIM : fail x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d7b9850d49b6b0cf1 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none --1982344905-261123555-1356108094=:10409 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mal =0A=A0=0AI think we being asked to "Play the game" which I for one have= no objection to.=0A=0A73 es GL Pete M0FMT IO91UX=0A=0A=0A>________________= ________________=0A> From: mal hamilton =0A>To: rsgb= =0A>Sent: Friday, 21 December 2012, 15:25= =0A>Subject: LF: NOV 472=0A> =0A>=0A> =0A>MF info =0A>After all the discu= ssion that took place yesterday about a =0ANOV issued for 20th Decemer 2012= until December 2017. Today I=A0applied via =0Athe same RSGB website for a = NOV which I thought would have the new date of issue =0A1st January 2013 un= til 1st January 2018. =0A>This application was REFUSED stating that I had a= lready =0Abeen issued a NOV.=A0 Therefore my conclusion is that my original= NOV issued =0Ayesterday morning is still current and valid as stated from = 20th December 2012 =0Auntil 20th December 2017. =0A>I expect others will fi= nd themselves in the same =0Aposition. =0A>It now appears that there are tw= o sets of NOV for the 472 =0A- 479 Khz band and likewise for the 5 Mhz band= . =0A>I would have thought the easy solution to this problem =0Awould be to= have stuck to the original NOV issued on 20th December =0A2012. =0A>this w= ould have avoided any further confusion, especially =0Asince there is only = a few days to go until 1st January 2013. =0A>Mistakes and misunderstandings= do happen between issuing =0Aagencies and a simple solution is usually the= answer. =0A>=A0 =0A>de G3KEV =0A>=0A>=A0 =0A>=0A> --1982344905-261123555-1356108094=:10409 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mal
 
I think we being asked to "Play the ga= me" which I for one have no objection to.
 
73 es GL Pete M0FMT IO91UX
= From: mal hamilton <g3kevmal@talktalk.net>
To: rsgb <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Sent: Friday, 21 December 20= 12, 15:25
Subject: LF:= NOV 472

=0A=0A =0A =0A=0A=0A
=0A
MF info
=0A<= div>After all the discussion that took place yesterday= about a =0ANOV issued for 20th Decemer 2012 until December 2017. Today I&n= bsp;applied via =0Athe same RSGB website for a NOV which I thought would ha= ve the new date of issue =0A1st January 2013 until 1st January 2018.=
=0A
This application was REFUSED stating tha= t I had already =0Abeen issued a NOV.  Therefore my conclusion is that= my original NOV issued =0Ayesterday morning is still current and valid as = stated from 20th December 2012 =0Auntil 20th December 2017.
=0A=
I expect others will find themselves in the same = =0Aposition.
=0A
It now appears that t= here are two sets of NOV for the 472 =0A- 479 Khz band and likewise for the= 5 Mhz band.
=0A
I would have thought = the easy solution to this problem =0Awould be to have stuck to the original= NOV issued on 20th December =0A2012.
=0A
this would have avoided any further confusion, especially =0Asince ther= e is only a few days to go until 1st January 2013.
=0A
Mistakes and misunderstandings do happen between issuing = =0Aagencies and a simple solution is usually the answer.
=0A 
=0A
de G= 3KEV
=0A
 
=0A
&n= bsp;
=0A


= --1982344905-261123555-1356108094=:10409--