Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mk04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 9BB20380000E2; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 09:55:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TlhVL-0002N8-It for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 14:53:47 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TlhVL-0002My-0F for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 14:53:47 +0000 Received: from out1.ip06ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.242]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TlhVD-00075P-VS for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 14:53:45 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvEFAIwl01BcHn6p/2dsb2JhbABEpiUDhSqNZ4Q0F3OCGQUBAQUIAQEDSQIsAQEDBQIBAxEEAQEKJRQBBAgSBhYIBhMKAQICAQGHcAMTCK9BDYlVi2lphEMDiC2FUYY3gnKKG4URgnQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,324,1355097600"; d="scan'208,217";a="560485024" Received: from host-92-30-126-169.as13285.net (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([92.30.126.169]) by out1.ip06ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 20 Dec 2012 14:53:18 +0000 Message-ID: <00d701cddec1$bb714730$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <001e01cddea6$9598aa00$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf><50D2FB08.3000704@iup.uni-heidelberg.de><003401cddea9$2d337a00$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf><50D308C8.7090202@iup.uni-heidelberg.de><50D314FF.8060504@psk31.plus.com><50D319C0.9050604@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 14:53:11 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 3.8 (+++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Roger DF5QG is also on the freq calling CQ. Not hrd u so far gl de mal/g3kev ----- Original Message ----- From: Roger Lapthorn To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 2:41 PM Subject: Re: LF: NOV 472 [...] Content analysis details: (3.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 3.8 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 X-Scan-Signature: 059065dc6500ac08f691f2dd07d4538f Subject: Re: LF: NOV 472 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00D4_01CDDEC1.BB359DC0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40, HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNSAFE,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d618850d326db2bee X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00D4_01CDDEC1.BB359DC0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Roger DF5QG is also on the freq calling CQ. Not hrd u so far gl de mal/g3kev ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Roger Lapthorn=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 2:41 PM Subject: Re: LF: NOV 472 Mal. calling you on CW but I'm too weak as you are sending QRZ? 73s Roger G3XBM On 20 December 2012 14:22, Roger Lapthorn = wrote: Well, assuming that my NoV date details are correct and it is indeed = valid from today, as it states in the NoV, I've started on the new band = in WSPR and got my first reports from PA3ABK/47 - thank you.=20 My 10mW ERP is unlikely to impact the end the world supposedly due = tomorrow. Besides, I want to have one last fling. Incidentally, I applied to OFCOM to renew my 9kHz NoV nearly 2 = months ago and am still waiting to even get an acknowledgement that it = is being processed. 73s Roger G3XBM =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 On 20 December 2012 13:59, Stefan Sch=E4fer = wrote: Hi Eddie,=20 Maybe you'll get the two missed NOVs later. With 3 NOVs in hand = you may be allowed to run 3x the ERP? Congrats to all who received the NOV. Hope to see you on the band = in the evening. (We have a xmas party (the 3rd) in the working group = soon, so i will drink a lot. But it should be still fine for CW at usual = speeds :-) ). 73, Stefan Am 20.12.2012 14:39, schrieb g3zjo:=20 Hi Stefan I bet there was no confusion over dates with your notifications, = I bet the UK makes you smile. I applied yesterday before the link went down and actually = applied twice because the Submit Application button returned a message = 'you have decided to save as a PDF'. The second submission said = 'Application Rejected, NOV already applied for for this call sign'. = However I received no NOV so I have just applied for the third time, no = rejection as duplicate / triplicate and the NOV has arrived. Third time = lucky. The dating is ambiguous, and contradicts the Ofcom announcement. =20 Date of issue of this Variation: 20 December 2012 Date of expiry of this Variation: 20 December 2017 But I must agree with Mal if the variation is issued today and = expires on 20th Dec 2017 it would seem to be valid as of now, if they = have decided to give a little early pressy why don't they say so. 73 Eddie G3ZJO --=20 http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/ http://www.g3xbm.co.uk https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/ http://qss2.blogspot.com/ --=20 http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/ http://www.g3xbm.co.uk https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/ http://qss2.blogspot.com/ ------=_NextPart_000_00D4_01CDDEC1.BB359DC0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Roger
DF5QG is also on the freq calling CQ. Not hrd u = so=20 far
gl de mal/g3kev
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Roger=20 Lapthorn
Sent: Thursday, December 20, = 2012 2:41=20 PM
Subject: Re: LF: NOV 472

Mal. calling you on CW but I'm too weak as you are sending=20 QRZ?

73s
Roger G3XBM


On 20 December 2012 14:22, Roger Lapthorn = <rogerlapthorn@gmail.com> wrote:
Well, assuming that my NoV date details are correct and it is = indeed=20 valid from today, as it states in the NoV, I've started on the new = band in=20 WSPR and got my first reports from PA3ABK/47 - thank you.=20

My 10mW ERP is unlikely to impact the end the world supposedly = due=20 tomorrow.  Besides, I want to have one last = fling.

Incidentally, I applied to OFCOM to renew my 9kHz NoV nearly 2 = months=20 ago and am still waiting to even get an acknowledgement that = it is=20 being processed.

73s
Roger G3XBM












On 20 December 2012 13:59, Stefan Sch=E4fer = <Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> = wrote:
Hi Eddie,

Maybe = you'll get=20 the two missed NOVs later. With 3 NOVs in hand you may be allowed = to run=20 3x the ERP?

Congrats to all who received the NOV. Hope to = see you=20 on the band in the evening. (We have a xmas party (the 3rd) in the = working=20 group soon, so i will drink a lot. But it should be still fine for = CW at=20 usual speeds :-) ).

73, Stefan

Am 20.12.2012 14:39, = schrieb=20 g3zjo:=20
Hi Stefan

I bet there was no = confusion=20 over dates with your notifications, I bet the UK makes you=20 smile.

I applied yesterday before the link went down and = actually=20 applied twice because the Submit Application button returned a = message=20 'you have decided to save as a PDF'. The second submission said=20 'Application Rejected, NOV already applied for for this call = sign'.=20 However I received no NOV so I have just applied for the third = time, no=20 rejection as duplicate / triplicate and the NOV has arrived. = Third time=20 lucky.

The dating is ambiguous, and contradicts the Ofcom = announcement.
 
Date of issue of this Variation: 20 = December=20 2012
Date of expiry of this Variation: 20 December = 2017

But I=20 must agree with Mal if the variation is issued today and expires = on 20th=20 Dec 2017 it would seem to be valid as of now, if they have = decided to=20 give a little early pressy why don't they say so.


73 = Eddie=20 G3ZJO


--=20
 http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
http://www.g3xbm.co.uk
https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/
http://qss2.blogspot.com/

=


--
 http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
http://www.g3xbm.co.uk
https://sites.google.com/= site/sub9khz/
http://qss2.blogspot.com/

<= /DIV>
------=_NextPart_000_00D4_01CDDEC1.BB359DC0--