Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dk01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id B76423800008F; Wed, 19 Dec 2012 14:41:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TlPVe-0006qg-Co for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 19 Dec 2012 19:40:54 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.34] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TlPVd-0006qX-V2 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 19 Dec 2012 19:40:53 +0000 Received: from out1.ip02ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.238]) by relay2.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TlPVb-0004x1-DK for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 19 Dec 2012 19:40:52 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AuEOAAoW0lBcF/qc/2dsb2JhbABEimmyCwOBBRdzghkFAQEEAQgBAQMaLwImBgEBAwUCAQMRBAEBAQklFAEECBIGFggGEwoBAgIBAYdwAwkKrlANiVWLZGlAWoMpA4gshVGGN40NhRGCdA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,318,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="413114368" Received: from host-92-23-250-156.as13285.net (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([92.23.250.156]) by out1.ip02ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 19 Dec 2012 19:35:19 +0000 Message-ID: <004001cdde1f$f82ca400$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <74990487DB15443395032604923B066C@AGB> <003301cdde11$1c631c00$55295400$@com> <004901cdde13$433b5840$c9b208c0$@com> <50D20CE1.6060904@gmail.com> <657A233B244F4A2BA09BB770BA349D81@AGB> <50D214A4.1080901@kpnmail.nl> Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 19:35:14 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 2.6 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay2.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Jan Solid copy from you also Graham absolutely solid NO DROPOUTS or Garble Yes Amtor or Pactor for example would work well on 500 probably more suitable than all the other Data modes which are hit and miss most of the time [...] Content analysis details: (2.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 2.6 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 X-Scan-Signature: 0cdfd8d5ce44f1724c623c4ac9f44df6 Subject: Re: LF: Back to basics RTTY 45.45 / 85 Hz shift Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=UPPERCASE_25_50 autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1db40550d2187b22c3 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Jan Solid copy from you also Graham absolutely solid NO DROPOUTS or Garble Yes Amtor or Pactor for example would work well on 500 probably more suitable than all the other Data modes which are hit and miss most of the time 73 de Mal/g3kev ----- Original Message ----- From: "pa3abk" To: Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 7:25 PM Subject: Re: LF: Back to basics RTTY 45.45 / 85 Hz shift > Tks John and Mal, > Didn't expect this result > Used FL-Digi in Custom RTTY mode. > Shift 340HZ/4 = 85Hz > GW3UEP PA > > Do have a an old GPLX MK2 board and also AMT-3. > Graham transmissions were received 60-70%, so a TOR-ARQ could made it > error free. > Providing I can widen the TX shift, interface it, and changeover delay > is not too long. > > Jan/pa3abk > > On 19-12-2012 20:08, Graham wrote: > > Ok John, > > > > Well thats quite amazing , considering rtty in the early days . > > > > The test of two cats has become the true test of a data mode hihi > > > > .I have a set of 'random' lines at one point , but with the > > festive flashing lights , would need to be a good signal to decode > > > > ive set the timer to 5 mins in case others want to send , but > > if you use the signal browser , any rtty will decode inside the > > audio pass band -- this is low-cpu data : ) > > > > Tnx -All > > > > Graham . > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > From: "John Pumford-Green" > > Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 6:52 PM > > To: > > Subject: Re: LF: Back to basics RTTY 45.45 / 85 Hz shift > > > >> On 19/12/2012 18:04, Terry GW0EZY wrote: > >>> Getting better. It would be an easy CW QSO........! > >>> > >>> RYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYR > >>> > >>> 64646464646 SMART BEACONS SEND OPERA 1234567890 > >>> > >>> RYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYC > >>> > >>> THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPED OVER THE LAZEY MOON > >>> > >>> DE G0NBD G0NBD G0NBD TESTINV IO83LK IO83LK > >>> > >> > >> > >> And in Shetland / IP90GG / 475 miles: > >> > >> RYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYR > >> 64646464646 SMART BEACNS SEND OPERA 1234567890 > >> RYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRWRYRYRYRYR > >> THE QUICK > >> BROWN FOX JUMPED OVER THE LAZEY MOON > >> DE G0NBD G0NBD G0NBD TESTING IO83LK IO83LK > >> > >> > >> as well as: > >> > >> > >> TEST PA3ABK ------ > >> HELLO WORLD > >> I HAVE NO CATS > >> END OF TEST > >> > >> from elsewhere... > >> > >> John > >> GM4SLV > >> Shetland > >> IP90gg > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > -- > pa3abk <-> dordrecht jo21it > >