Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dk06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 850603800009B; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 04:04:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TiiDq-0005Fb-7f for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:03:22 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TiiDp-0005FS-Qp for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:03:21 +0000 Received: from out1.ip04ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.240]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TiiDn-0005Na-Nu for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:03:20 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AtQIAHhHyFBcF/Ox/2dsb2JhbABFhjeELrQ8F3OCGQUBAQQBCAEBAxYPASMCLAEBAwUCAQMRBAEBAwIFIQICFAEEGgYWCAYTCgECAgEBh3oKqUWTCIEiiymBGoIWgRMDjXyYU4Jz X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,265,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="393711456" Received: from host-92-23-243-177.as13285.net (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([92.23.243.177]) by out1.ip04ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 12 Dec 2012 09:02:57 +0000 Message-ID: <003301cdd847$76b12190$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <50C78875.5050005@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:02:50 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 3.8 (+++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Tony Too many stns on Beacon/Broadcast mode, they have lost the art of Receiving or have NO Receiver at all. QSO mode is now rare these days compared to years ago. Hope to work you on 472 Khz shortly on CW [...] Content analysis details: (3.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 3.8 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 X-Scan-Signature: 33d261536bb1467bb13d5764461d5ec4 Subject: Re: LF: HB9ASB Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1db40a50c848ae1c5e X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Tony Too many stns on Beacon/Broadcast mode, they have lost the art of Receiving or have NO Receiver at all. QSO mode is now rare these days compared to years ago. Hope to work you on 472 Khz shortly on CW De Mal/g3kev ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 8:23 AM Subject: Re: LF: HB9ASB > > Hi Stefan > Yes, it was me. Your signal was 599 here = 50uV and more than 40 dB > above Noise in 100 Hz BW. That's why I called you in CW. > You should really improve your RX situation. I'm sorry to say, but > right now you are a big crocodile on the band ;-) > 73 de Toni > > >Preferred mode CW and SSB, no digital mode or similar computergames! > > No fake QSO’s!< > > > Am 11.12.2012 20:24, schrieb Stefan Schäfer: > > Toni, > > > > I guess that was you, answering to my call in CW? Sorry, i didn't > > listen to the band in that moment. The peak hold graph also indicates > > that the S/N was to low for CW reception. This must have to do with > > some new QRM in the background. The QRM interacts with the strength > > of > > HGA22. That's why expect that i will have much better LF reception > > with my new RX concept which is on the plan since a longer time. > > However i'm waiting for the mixer (SBL-3) from the US since several > > weeks. Hopefully soon... > > > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC > >