Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mh06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 66E133800008A; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 10:25:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TZNm5-0006SB-Tt for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 15:24:09 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TZNm5-0006S2-Ad for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 15:24:09 +0000 Received: from smtpa1.mediabeam.com ([194.25.41.13] helo=smtpa2.mediabeam.com) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TZNm2-000429-NZ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 15:24:08 +0000 Received: from IMAP4 (balancer7.mediabeam.com [10.100.1.80]) by smtpa2.mediabeam.com (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id qAGFO5Rl028935 for ; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 16:24:05 +0100 Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 16:24:04 +0100 From: uwe-jannsen@kabelmail.de To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 (Normal) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Stefan, it looks like that at jo43sv: 1446 0 -30 2.5 1432.0 0.00 1448 1 -17 0.0 1446.4 0.00 DF2JP JO31JG [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [194.25.41.13 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 4ad75ad27eb9a353f40105f6e3872b5c Subject: Re: Re: LF: Testing JT9-2 on 474KHz dial + 1440Hz Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----B0CBE54EEA2C409D9AADD578A27B7B15" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,LINES_OF_YELLING, NO_REAL_NAME,PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60da50a65acb417e X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none ------B0CBE54EEA2C409D9AADD578A27B7B15 Content-type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Stefan, it looks like that at jo43sv: 1446 0 -30 2=2E5 1432=2E0 0=2E00=20 1448 1 -17 0=2E0 1446=2E4 0=2E00 DF2JP JO31JG =20 1450 0 -30 -1=2E1 1451=2E1 0=2E00=20 1452 1 -11 0=2E0 1446=2E4 0=2E00 DF2JP JO31JG =20 1454 0 -32 0=2E6 1451=2E6 0=2E00=20 1456 2 -13 -0=2E1 1446=2E4 0=2E00 DF2JP JO31JG =20 1458 0 -28 0=2E4 1447=2E4 0=2E00=20 1500 1 -16 0=2E1 1446=2E4 0=2E00 DF2JP JO31JG =20 GL Uwe/dj8wx, using WSJTx Von: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep=2Eorg Gesendet: 16=2E11=2E2012 16:07 An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep=2Eorg Betreff: Re: LF: Testing JT9-2 on 474KHz dial + 1440Hz Hi Joe, 1358 0 -35 -2=2E4 1440=2E6 0=2E00 1400 10 -22 1=2E1 1438=2E0 0=2E00 DF2JP JO31JG 1406 0 -33 -2=2E1 1442=2E3 0=2E00 1412 10 -19 1=2E4 1438=2E0 0=2E00 DF2JP JO31JG 1422 0 -35 2=2E3 1450=2E6 0=2E00 1426 0 -32 0=2E7 1433=2E6 0=2E00 1428 10 -19 1=2E5 1437=2E9 0=2E00 DF2JP JO31JG 1430 0 -33 -2=2E2 1433=2E6 0=2E00 1434 0 -32 0=2E9 1430=2E5 0=2E00 1436 2 -22 1=2E5 1437=2E6 0=2E00 DF2JP JO31JG 1446 0 -34 -1=2E4 1438=2E7 0=2E00 1458 0 -36 0=2E8 1430=2E6 0=2E00 1500 6 -26 1=2E3 1437=2E8 0=2E00 DF2JP JO31JG That's what i have so far=2E Some 2-minute slots are lost by the decod= er,=20 don't know why=2E It is v0=2E4 and XP SP3, however i still have to use= =20 SpecLab and VAC=2E=2E=2E Joe, can we try a QSO on 137=2E44 kHz? 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 16=2E11=2E2012 14:59, schrieb Stefan Sch=E4fer: > Hello Joe, > > Thanks for the test! > I can see you clearly in the spectrogram=2E Just started WSJT-X=2E P= lease=20 > let it run for a while=2E Would be interesting to see if it works mo= re=20 > consistent for me now=2E > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC > > > Am 16=2E11=2E2012 13:28, schrieb Joe DF2JP: >> Hi Tobias, >> >> thanks for the reports, sorry I was out for a while=2E >> My Antenna was pointing to UK, didn't see any signal in the=20 >> waterfall=2E I've >> now turned to NW to your direction=2E >> >> 73 Joe >> DF2JP >> >> -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht----- >> Von: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep=2Eorg >> [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep=2Eorg] Im Auftrag von Tobias= DG3LV >> Gesendet: Freitag, 16=2E November 2012 12:44 >> An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep=2Eorg >> Betreff: Re: LF: Testing JT9-2 on 474KHz dial + 1440Hz >> >> Hi DF2JP Joe ! >> >> Reports : >> 1028 10 5 0=2E5 1448=2E3 0=2E00 DF2JP JO31JG >> 1032 10 13 0=2E3 1448=2E3 0=2E00 DF2JP JO31JG >> 1036 10 3 0=2E4 1448=2E3 0=2E00 DF2JP JO31JG >> 1040 10 16 0=2E5 1448=2E3 0=2E00 DF2JP JO31JG >> 1044 10 11 0=2E5 1448=2E3 0=2E00 DF2JP JO31JG >> 1048 10 11 0=2E6 1448=2E3 0=2E00 DF2JP JO31JG >> 1052 8 12 0=2E4 1448=2E3 0=2E00 DF2JP JO31JG >> 1056 7 13 0=2E4 1448=2E4 0=2E00 DF2JP JO31JG >> 1100 10 13 0=2E5 1448=2E4 0=2E00 DF2JP JO31JG >> 1104 10 6 0=2E5 1448=2E3 0=2E00 DF2JP JO31JG >> 1108 9 13 0=2E5 1448=2E4 0=2E00 DF2JP JO31JG >> 1112 10 13 0=2E3 1448=2E3 0=2E00 DF2JP JO31JG >> 1116 10 12 0=2E5 1448=2E3 0=2E00 DF2JP JO31JG >> 1120 10 6 0=2E5 1448=2E3 0=2E00 DF2JP JO31JG >> 1124 10 9 0=2E4 1448=2E3 0=2E00 DF2JP JO31JG >> 1128 10 2 0=2E5 1448=2E2 0=2E00 DF2JP JO31JG >> 1132 10 11 0=2E5 1448=2E2 0=2E00 DF2JP JO31JG >> >> running WSJT-X rev 2731=2E "real" and visible SNR might be -24 to -= 27dB=2E >> Distance 386km at noon! >> >> Can you see my answers ? >> >> 73 de dg3lv Tobias >> >> Am 16=2E11=2E2012 08:04, schrieb Joe DF2JP: >>> Hi LF, >>> >>> I=B4ve just started a JT9-2 beacon on 474=2E000 kHz, let it run fo= r a few >> hours=2E >>> 73 Joe >>> DF2JP >>> >>> >>> >> > ------B0CBE54EEA2C409D9AADD578A27B7B15 Content-type: text/html; charset=Windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Stefan,
it looks like that at jo43sv:


1446 0 -30 2=2E5 1432=2E0 0=2E00

1448 1 -17 0=2E0 1446= =2E4 0=2E00 DF2JP JO31JG

1450 0 -30 -1=2E1 1451= =2E1 0=2E00

1452 1 -11 0=2E0 1446= =2E4 0=2E00 DF2JP JO31JG

1454 0 -32 0=2E6 1451= =2E6 0=2E00

1456 2 -13 -0=2E1 1446= =2E4 0=2E00 DF2JP JO31JG

1458 0 -28 0=2E4 1447= =2E4 0=2E00

1500 1 -16 0=2E1 1446= =2E4 0=2E00 DF2JP JO31JG



GL
Uwe/dj8wx, using WSJTx
Von: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep=2Eorg
Gesendet: 16=2E11=2E2012 16:07
An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep=2Eorg
Betreff: Re: LF: Testing JT9-2 on 474KHz dial + 1440Hz

Hi Joe,

1358 0 -35 -2=2E4 1440=2E6 0=2E00
1400 10 -22 1=2E1 1438=2E0 0=2E00 DF2JP JO31JG
1406 0 -33 -2=2E1 1442=2E3 0=2E00
1412 10 -19 1=2E4 1438=2E0 0=2E00 DF2JP JO31JG
1422 0 -35 2=2E3 1450=2E6 0=2E00
1426 0 -32 0=2E7 1433=2E6 0=2E00
1428 10 -19 1=2E5 1437=2E9 0=2E00 DF2JP JO31JG
1430 0 -33 -2=2E2 1433=2E6 0=2E00
1434 0 -32 0=2E9 1430=2E5 0=2E00
1436 2 -22 1=2E5 1437=2E6 0=2E00 DF2JP JO31JG
1446 0 -34 -1=2E4 1438=2E7 0=2E00
1458 0 -36 0=2E8 1430=2E6 0=2E00
1500 6 -26 1=2E3 1437=2E8 0=2E00 DF2JP JO31JG

That's what i have so far=2E Some 2-minute slots are lost by the decode= r,
don't know why=2E It is v0=2E4 and XP SP3, however i still have to use =
SpecLab and VAC=2E=2E=2E


Joe, can we try a QSO on 137=2E44 kHz?

73, Stefan/DK7FC


Am 16=2E11=2E2012 14:59, schrieb Stefan Schäfer:
> Hello Joe,
>
> Thanks for the test!
> I can see you clearly in the spectrogram=2E Just started WSJT-X=2E= Please
> let it run for a while=2E Would be interesting to see if it works = more
> consistent for me now=2E
>
> 73, Stefan/DK7FC
>
>
> Am 16=2E11=2E2012 13:28, schrieb Joe DF2JP:
>> Hi Tobias,
>>
>> thanks for the reports, sorry I was out for a while=2E
>> My Antenna was pointing to UK, didn't see any signal in the >> waterfall=2E I've
>> now turned to NW to your direction=2E
>>
>> 73 Joe
>> DF2JP
>>
>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>> Von: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep=2Eorg
>> [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep=2Eorg] Im Auftrag von T= obias DG3LV
>> Gesendet: Freitag, 16=2E November 2012 12:44
>> An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep=2Eorg
>> Betreff: Re: LF: Testing JT9-2 on 474KHz dial + 1440Hz
>>
>> Hi DF2JP Joe !
>>
>> Reports :
>> 1028 10 5 0=2E5 1448=2E3 0=2E00 DF2JP JO31JG
>> 1032 10 13 0=2E3 1448=2E3 0=2E00 DF2JP JO31JG
>> 1036 10 3 0=2E4 1448=2E3 0=2E00 DF2JP JO31JG
>> 1040 10 16 0=2E5 1448=2E3 0=2E00 DF2JP JO31JG
>> 1044 10 11 0=2E5 1448=2E3 0=2E00 DF2JP JO31JG
>> 1048 10 11 0=2E6 1448=2E3 0=2E00 DF2JP JO31JG
>> 1052 8 12 0=2E4 1448=2E3 0=2E00 DF2JP JO31JG
>> 1056 7 13 0=2E4 1448=2E4 0=2E00 DF2JP JO31JG
>> 1100 10 13 0=2E5 1448=2E4 0=2E00 DF2JP JO31JG
>> 1104 10 6 0=2E5 1448=2E3 0=2E00 DF2JP JO31JG
>> 1108 9 13 0=2E5 1448=2E4 0=2E00 DF2JP JO31JG
>> 1112 10 13 0=2E3 1448=2E3 0=2E00 DF2JP JO31JG
>> 1116 10 12 0=2E5 1448=2E3 0=2E00 DF2JP JO31JG
>> 1120 10 6 0=2E5 1448=2E3 0=2E00 DF2JP JO31JG
>> 1124 10 9 0=2E4 1448=2E3 0=2E00 DF2JP JO31JG
>> 1128 10 2 0=2E5 1448=2E2 0=2E00 DF2JP JO31JG
>> 1132 10 11 0=2E5 1448=2E2 0=2E00 DF2JP JO31JG
>>
>> running WSJT-X rev 2731=2E "real" and visible SNR might be -24= to -27dB=2E
>> Distance 386km at noon!
>>
>> Can you see my answers ?
>>
>> 73 de dg3lv Tobias
>>
>> Am 16=2E11=2E2012 08:04, schrieb Joe DF2JP:
>>> Hi LF,
>>>
>>> I´ve just started a JT9-2 beacon on 474=2E000 kHz, l= et it run for a few
>> hours=2E
>>> 73 Joe
>>> DF2JP
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
------B0CBE54EEA2C409D9AADD578A27B7B15--