Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dh01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 791AC3800010C; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 12:25:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Tcfcz-0005em-DZ for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 17:04:21 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Tcfcz-0005ed-1m for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 17:04:21 +0000 Received: from nina.ucs.mun.ca ([134.153.232.76]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Tcfcx-0005u6-1T for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 17:04:19 +0000 Received: from plato.ucs.mun.ca (plato.ucs.mun.ca [134.153.232.153]) by nina.ucs.mun.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id qAPH3umI016810 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 13:33:56 -0330 Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 13:33:56 -0330 (NST) From: jcraig@mun.ca X-X-Sender: jcraig@plato.ucs.mun.ca To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <50B16BF8.1040007@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Message-ID: References: <8CF97D11C5AE652-1638-E77C@webmail-m030.sysops.aol.com> <50B16BF8.1040007@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MUN-Disclaimer: http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/elect_communications_disclaimer_2012.php X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Stefan, Thank-you for the schematic of the 160-630m XVTR. It seems we use similar gating so it is unclear to me where the incoherence in phase originates. 73 Joe [...] Content analysis details: (-0.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: b77892ad90d0261eaf071f4f6cf31464 Subject: Re: LF: VO1NA at 20:00 - or not? Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d411550b25498778b X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Stefan, Thank-you for the schematic of the 160-630m XVTR. It seems we use similar= =20 gating so it is unclear to me where the incoherence in phase originates. 73 Joe On Sun, 25 Nov 2012, Stefan Sch=E4fer wrote: > Hi Joe, > > For example my MF PA is also keying coherently, see the schematic at=20 > https://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/MF/100W%20475kHz%20PA.png > Not difficult :-) > 73, GL, Stefan > > Am 25.11.2012 01:31, schrieb jcraig@mun.ca: >> Markus, >>=20 >> Thank-you for the very helpful information. It seems that achieving=20 >> coherence is not at all difficult and a worthwhile project for the >> future. >>=20 >> 73 >> Joe > > This electronic communication is governed by the terms and conditions at http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/electronic_communications_disclaimer_2012.php