Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mp05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 8711D38000089; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 22:45:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TTklc-0003pu-0A for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 02:44:24 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TTklb-0003pl-CM for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 02:44:23 +0000 Received: from nina.ucs.mun.ca ([134.153.232.76]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TTklZ-0001on-95 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 02:44:22 +0000 Received: from plato.ucs.mun.ca (plato.ucs.mun.ca [134.153.232.153]) by nina.ucs.mun.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id qA12iInv018925 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 00:14:18 -0230 Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 00:14:18 -0230 (NDT) From: jcraig@mun.ca X-X-Sender: jcraig@plato.ucs.mun.ca To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <5091DABF.6000301@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Message-ID: References: <5090EEF7.5040806@xs4all.nl> <418BB03E1F0E4B24936FF0DD26C5AD59@White> <5091BF22.7050808@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <5091C6E2.9040509@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <5091CD00.50608@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <5091DABF.6000301@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MUN-Disclaimer: http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/elect_communications_disclaimer_2012.php X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Nothing so far (0247 utc), Stefan. 73 & GN Joe On Thu, 1 Nov 2012, Stefan Schäfer wrote: [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 195b836cb7437e99aa05107459888659 Subject: Re: LF: VO1NA QSX 136.000K OP32 NOW!! Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1dc1495091e24237a6 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Nothing so far (0247 utc), Stefan. 73 & GN Joe On Thu, 1 Nov 2012, Stefan Sch=C3=A4fer wrote: > Hello Joe, LF, > > Thank you! I just started another round, a last one. Let's see if there i= s=20 > some QSB. > The conds to the northern TA path seem to be not so good though. VE1VDM= =20 > reported so, from my yesterdays signal. Jay reported so about the todays= =20 > signals. TF3HZ shows good propagation as usual... > The path to YV7MAE is also promising, when looking to the yesterdays DCF= =20 > plots. Thus i'll QSY to DFCW-90 later for the night. > > 73, GN, Stefan/DK7FC > > > Am 01.11.2012 03:03, schrieb jcraig@mun.ca: >> Hi Stefan, >>=20 >> The RX works a little better now.... >> 0159 136 DK7FC Op32 -31 dB >>=20 >> Congrats and thanks for the signal! >>=20 >> Joe VO1NA >>=20 >> On Thu, 1 Nov 2012, Stefan Sch=C3=A4fer wrote: >>=20 >>> Hi Joe, >>>=20 >>> OK, a few minutes, OP32, 136.515. >>> 73, Stefan >>>=20 >>>> Hi Stefan, >>>>=20 >>>> Its set up for OP32, but the PC is not connected to the internet. >>>> The RX is ready when you are. >>>>=20 >>>> 73 >>>> Joe >>>=20 >>>=20 >> This electronic communication is governed by the terms and conditions at >> http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/electronic_communications_disclaimer_2012.= php=20 >>=20 > > This electronic communication is governed by the terms and conditions at http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/electronic_communications_disclaimer_2012.php