Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-da04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 176373800009E; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 20:41:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TTiq1-0002nI-IA for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 00:40:49 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TTiq1-0002n7-4U for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 00:40:49 +0000 Received: from nina.ucs.mun.ca ([134.153.232.76]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TTipz-0000wg-9s for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 00:40:48 +0000 Received: from plato.ucs.mun.ca (plato.ucs.mun.ca [134.153.232.153]) by nina.ucs.mun.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id qA10ejJa005948 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 22:10:45 -0230 Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 22:10:45 -0230 (NDT) From: jcraig@mun.ca X-X-Sender: jcraig@plato.ucs.mun.ca To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <5090EEF7.5040806@xs4all.nl> <418BB03E1F0E4B24936FF0DD26C5AD59@White> <5091BF22.7050808@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MUN-Disclaimer: http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/elect_communications_disclaimer_2012.php X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Sorry Stefan (and Graham)... My last email should have had a "Hi Stefan" salutation! Joe VO1NA On Wed, 31 Oct 2012, jcraig@mun.ca wrote: [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: bde53fa3678f346afe39dd99e3e185db Subject: Re: LF: VO1NA QSX 136.000K OP32 NOW!! Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=X-UNKNOWN; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d404c5091c5366b33 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Sorry Stefan (and Graham)... My last email should have had a "Hi Stefan" salutation! Joe VO1NA On Wed, 31 Oct 2012, jcraig@mun.ca wrote: > Hi Graham, > > Sorry but not QRV on TX. The LF station is dismantled at the moment -- a= =20 > heartbreaking story. The RX is on since > 2200 utc but nil so far. > > 73 > Joe > > On Thu, 1 Nov 2012, Stefan Sch=E4fer wrote: > >> Hello Joe, >>=20 >> Are you still QRV in OP32? I would like to try if i can make it to you a= s=20 >> well. Give me a short sign please. >>=20 >> 73, Stefan >>=20 >> Am 31.10.2012 23:45, schrieb jcraig@mun.ca: >>> Greetings Albert and Markus, >>>=20 >>> It was most gratifying to see your call signs on the screen. Thanks >>> to you both and Graham for the entertainment. >>>=20 >>> The RX is on again tonight. >>>=20 >>> 73 >>> Joe VO1NA >>>=20 >>> On Wed, 31 Oct 2012, Markus Vester wrote: >>>=20 >>>> This came a real surprise for me. Thank you Joe, you've made my day!= =20 >>>> Thanks also to Graham for the announcement and QSP. >>>>=20 >>>> Like Albert, I had also sent only a single round of "homemade" Opera. = So=20 >>>> that makes it 100% decodes, 2 out of 2 ;-) Antenna current here was 3.= 8=20 >>>> amps to a (recently recalibrated) effective height of 8.5 m, resulting= in=20 >>>> 0.63W ERP. >>>>=20 >>>> Perhaps I hadn't really deserved this, after all my critical remarks o= n=20 >>>> the mode's sensitivity ;-) >>>>=20 >>>> Best 73, >>>> Markus (DF6NM) >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> From: Albert W >>>> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 10:27 AM >>>> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >>>> Subject: Re: LF: VO1NA QSX 136.000K OP32 NOW!! >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> Joe, >>>>=20 >>>> I am very happy with this result, I only made one transmission in Op 32 >>>> @ 136kHz and after that back to WSJT-X on 500 kHz. >>>>=20 >>>> 73, Albert PA0A >>>>=20 >>>> Op 31-10-2012 10:13, jcraig@mun.ca schreef: >>>>=20 >>>> Dear Graham, Group, >>>>=20 >>>> There were 2 OP32 receptions last night (yesterday evening): >>>> 2113 PA0A -38 dB and 2202 DF6NM -36 dB. >>>>=20 >>>> 73 >>>> Joe VO1NA >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>=20 >>> This electronic communication is governed by the terms and conditions at >>> http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/electronic_communications_disclaimer_2012= .php=20 >>=20 > This electronic communication is governed by the terms and conditions at http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/electronic_communications_disclaimer_2012.php