Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mk06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id CF5EF3800009B; Sat, 3 Nov 2012 12:06:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TUgE0-0008B6-T2 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 16:05:32 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TUgE0-0008Ax-Ex for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 16:05:32 +0000 Received: from smtpout1.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.29] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TUgDy-0002ol-PD for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 16:05:31 +0000 Received: from AGB ([2.26.47.92]) by mwinf5d04 with ME id K45W1k0031zL8Y20345W0M; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 17:05:30 +0100 Message-ID: <7FFDFA17210A4DD8BCB87BA671D723C1@AGB> From: "Graham" To: References: <5094DB3E.9070809@npton.plus.com> <5094DC76.1000801@psk31.plus.com> <50950AA3.90001@kpnmail.nl> <50950D6E.1060501@psk31.plus.com> In-Reply-To: <50950D6E.1060501@psk31.plus.com> Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 16:05:29 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Eddie, Using Stefan's test ' I have two Cats ' ROS-MF-2 data mode sends the test message with upper and lower case in 59 seconds ( as far as my little clock can measure) there is no difference in the tx time using all upper / mixed or lower case [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-Scan-Signature: bde53fa3678f346afe39dd99e3e185db Subject: Re: LF: Fwd: JT9-1 500 + 1400 ( Using Stefan's test ' I have two Cats ') Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d618a509540fc4506 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Eddie, Using Stefan's test ' I have two Cats ' ROS-MF-2 data mode sends the test message with upper and lower case in 59 seconds ( as far as my little clock can measure) there is no difference in the tx time using all upper / mixed or lower case -29 dB ? what is that compared to wspr min decode level ? as the ros mode uses a different s/n reference G.. -------------------------------------------------- From: "g3zjo" Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2012 12:26 PM To: Subject: Re: LF: Fwd: JT9-1 500 + 1400 > Jan > > Thank you very much, a very useful report. Not a bad signal for the time > of day and only one minute send period passing a fair bit of information > in that time. > Such analysis would be difficult without digital modes. > > Eddie > > On 03/11/2012 12:14, pa3abk wrote: >> Eddie, >> >> Sigs are vy faint here. >> But the prg did decode some... Using r2713. >> It's all on the edge of my receiving capabilities. >> QRM below normal (heavy overcast killed sunpanels production of my >> neighbour) >> >> 0924 0 -29 0.3 1406.10 0.00 start >> 1008 4 -25 0.1 1399.52 0.00 G3ZJO TEST >> 1012 2 -27 0.2 1399.69 0.00 G3ZJO TEST >> 1018 5 -25 0.1 1399.90 0.00 G3ZJO TEST >> >> 1020 3 -26 0.1 1399.94 0.00 G3ZJO TEST >> >> 1022 3 -26 0.0 1400.08 0.00 G3ZJO TEST >> >> 1024 2 -27 0.1 1400.25 0.00 G3ZJO TEST >> >> 1042 4 -25 0.1 1400.63 0.00 G3ZJO TEST >> >> 1046 3 -26 0.0 1400.98 0.00 G3ZJO TEST >> 1050 4 -25 0.0 1401.71 0.00 G3ZJO TEST >> >> 1102 5 -24 0.1 1401.75 0.00 G3ZJO TEST >> >> 1104 1 -27 0.1 1401.75 0.00 G3ZJO TEST >> >> 1108 4 -25 0.1 1401.96 0.00 G3ZJO TEST >> 1112 1 -28 0.1 1402.06 0.00 G3ZJO TEST >> >> 1114 4 -25 0.1 1402.27 0.00 G3ZJO TEST >> >> 1128 2 -27 0.1 1402.10 0.00 G3ZJO TEST >> >> 1130 1 -28 0.1 1401.93 0.00 G3ZJO TEST >> >> 1200 0 -29 0.1 1402.83 0.00 last >> >> Assume you can figure out how many I missed view the interval of >> beaconing choosen. >> >> Using divider/4 principle can't TX in this mode. (yet) >> For WSPR I'm using a modified MP3 (shift 4x) and program scheduler, in >> case you wondered why I can produce WSPR and not WSJT-x :-) >> >> 73's >> Jan >> >> >> NNNN >> >> >> >> On 3-11-2012 9:57, g3zjo wrote: >>> I am currently testing JT9-1 on 500kHz dial +1400. >>> At the moment please e-mail for QSO. >>> >>> Eddie >>> >>> >> >> > >