Return-Path: Received: from mtain-di01.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-di01.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.166.5]) by imd-mb03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Inbound Mail Deferral) with ESMTP id 1D8AF700000BD for ; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 17:31:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-di01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 22ADD3800010A; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 17:31:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TYlTg-0007YE-9x for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 22:30:36 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TYlTf-0007Y1-PQ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 22:30:35 +0000 Received: from rhcavuit01.kulnet.kuleuven.be ([134.58.240.129] helo=cavuit01.kulnet.kuleuven.be) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TYlTd-0000Bl-Se for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 22:30:34 +0000 X-KULeuven-Envelope-From: rik.strobbe@fys.kuleuven.be X-KULeuven-Scanned: Found to be clean X-KULeuven-ID: E3E0E138046.ADC0D X-KULeuven-Information: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Received: from icts-p-smtps-1.cc.kuleuven.be (icts-p-smtps-1e.kulnet.kuleuven.be [134.58.240.33]) by cavuit01.kulnet.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3E0E138046 for ; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 23:30:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from ICTS-S-HUB2.luna.kuleuven.be (icts-s-hub2.luna.kuleuven.be [10.112.9.16]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by icts-p-smtps-1.cc.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4979404D for ; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 23:30:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be ([fe80::312b:f3bc:9c4:4ebb]) by ICTS-S-HUB2.luna.kuleuven.be ([fe80::8559:ca7c:e195:e15d%26]) with mapi id 14.02.0309.002; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 23:30:31 +0100 X-Kuleuven: This mail passed the K.U.Leuven mailcluster From: Rik Strobbe To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Thread-Topic: LF: Fwd: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Now running 500khz + 1400 JT9-1 ver4 Thread-Index: AQHNwqOJhtHjbp7xfEW+cZozgOMpP5fp1KXs///vpwCAAA9MgIAAFNQQ Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 22:30:30 +0000 Message-ID: <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FB569BA@ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be> References: <50A40978.1060007@npton.plus.com> <50A409F0.9040609@psk31.plus.com>,<50A416C5.9050400@kpnmail.nl> In-Reply-To: <50A416C5.9050400@kpnmail.nl> Accept-Language: nl-BE, en-US Content-Language: nl-BE X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.112.13.14] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 134.58.240.129 (rhcavuit01.kulnet.kuleuven.be) used invalid HELO/EHLO cavuit01.kulnet.kuleuven.be - verification failed X-Spam-Score: -0.9 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Eddie, Jan, I got decodes from Eddie at 21:56 (-27dB), 21:58 (-28dB), 22:14 (-27dB) and 22:16 (-22dB). All using v0.3. After installing v0.4 I ran the 21:58 wav in this version: it decoded at -9dB. Very high number? I have v0.4 running now (22:30UTC), let's see what it decodes. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [134.58.240.129 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.2 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: fbdd513523001863775249cfaf215eac Subject: RE: LF: Fwd: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Now running 500khz + 1400 JT9-1 ver4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1da60550a41bc65a13 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Eddie, Jan, I got decodes from Eddie at 21:56 (-27dB), 21:58 (-28dB), 22:14 (-27dB) and= 22:16 (-22dB). All using v0.3. After installing v0.4 I ran the 21:58 wav in this version: it decoded at -9= dB. Very high number? I have v0.4 running now (22:30UTC), let's see what it decodes. 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T=20 ________________________________________ Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org= ] namens pa3abk [pa3abk@kpnmail.nl] Verzonden: woensdag 14 november 2012 23:10 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Onderwerp: Re: LF: Fwd: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Now running 500khz + 1400 JT9-1= ver4 Eddie, It's difficult to tell whether their is an improvement. Figs seems slightly better. (Using V4) Meanwhile heavy QRN came up here peaking 9+20. Your signal showed a slow QSB over the last 40min. At 2126utc you disappeared in the noise and after that slowly increasing with a peak at 2146utc This is a visual observation in SL. The figures: 2048 1 -24 0.2 1416. 0.0 G3ZJO TEST 2058 10 -6 0.3 1406. 0.0 CQ OR7T JO20 2100 10 -8 0.2 1406. 0.0 CQ OR7T JO20 2104 3 -25 0.3 1416. 0.0 G3ZJO TEST 2118 4 -25 0.1 1416. 0.0 G3ZJO TEST 2120 3 -21 0.2 1417. 0.0 G3ZJO TEST 2122 3 -21 0.1 1417. 0.0 G3ZJO TEST 2132 3 -24 0.1 1417. 0.0 G3ZJO TEST 2134 1 -22 0.2 1416. 0.0 G3ZJO TEST 2136 2 -23 0.2 1417. 0.0 G3ZJO TEST 2138 4 -25 0.2 1416. 0.0 G3ZJO TEST 2140 4 -21 0.1 1416. 0.0 G3ZJO TEST 2142 5 -22 0.1 1417. 0.0 G3ZJO TEST 2144 9 -17 0.2 1416. 0.0 G3ZJO TEST 2146 2 -18 0.1 1416. 0.0 G3ZJO TEST 2148 8 -19 0.1 1417. 0.0 G3ZJO TEST 2150 6 -20 0.2 1416. 0.0 G3ZJO TEST 2154 8 -21 0.2 1417. 0.0 G3ZJO TEST 2156 7 -22 0.2 1416. 0.0 G3ZJO TEST 2158 3 -21 0.1 1417. 0.0 G3ZJO TEST 73's Jan On 14-11-2012 22:15, g3zjo wrote: > > Some fairly consistent de-codes sent direct from PA3ABK best S/N -23dB > using Ver3. > > I would be*very* pleased with one de-code from you Mauro. > > Eddie > > On 14/11/2012 20:57, IK1WVQ Mauro wrote: >> >> >> Hi, >> I am receiving @ 500KHz JT9-1 and OP4 and OP8 .. >> No decodes for now... >> >> 73 de Mauro IK1WVQ JN44CB >> >> >> At 21.06 14/11/12, you wrote: >>> >>> >>> First local de-code FB. >>> >>> Reports welcome of course. >>> >>> Eddie >>> >>> >>> >>> Nessun virus nel messaggio in arrivo. >>> Controllato da AVG - www.avg.com >>> Versione: 9.0.930 / Database dei virus: 2441.1.1/5394 - Data di >>> rilascio: 11/14/12 08:34:00 >> >> >> __._,_.___ >> >> >> Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional >> Change settings via the Web >> >> (Yahoo! ID required) >> Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest >> >> | Switch to Fully Featured >> >> >> Visit Your Group >> >> | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use >> | Unsubscribe >> >> >> __,_._,___ >> >> No virus found in this message. >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >> Version: 2012.0.2221 / Virus Database: 2441/5394 - Release Date: 11/14/1= 2 >> > > -- pa3abk <-> dordrecht jo21it=