Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mp05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id A9BB3380000BF; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 17:39:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TYP7y-0006G7-O1 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 22:38:42 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TYP7y-0006Fy-9Z for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 22:38:42 +0000 Received: from rhcavuit02.kulnet.kuleuven.be ([134.58.240.130] helo=cavuit02.kulnet.kuleuven.be) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TYP7w-00012J-G0 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 22:38:41 +0000 X-KULeuven-Envelope-From: rik.strobbe@fys.kuleuven.be X-KULeuven-Scanned: Found to be clean X-KULeuven-ID: 4D1BC1280CA.AE25C X-KULeuven-Information: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Received: from icts-p-smtps-1.cc.kuleuven.be (icts-p-smtps-1e.kulnet.kuleuven.be [134.58.240.33]) by cavuit02.kulnet.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D1BC1280CA for ; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 23:38:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from ICTS-S-HUB3.luna.kuleuven.be (icts-s-hub3.luna.kuleuven.be [10.112.9.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by icts-p-smtps-1.cc.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E072404D for ; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 23:38:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be ([fe80::312b:f3bc:9c4:4ebb]) by ICTS-S-HUB3.luna.kuleuven.be ([fe80::a470:76b3:406d:2b1a%27]) with mapi id 14.02.0309.002; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 23:38:38 +0100 X-Kuleuven: This mail passed the K.U.Leuven mailcluster From: Rik Strobbe To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Thread-Topic: LF: LF WSPR overnight Thread-Index: AQHNwemUJCD7WxhHfUaBViYQUUlIypfoQKUAgAAEAwCAABPgng== Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 22:38:37 +0000 Message-ID: <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FB56597@ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be> References: <50A2C13C.80500@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> ,<50A2C6E6.7050303@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: <50A2C6E6.7050303@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Accept-Language: nl-BE, en-US Content-Language: nl-BE X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.112.13.14] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 134.58.240.130 (rhcavuit02.kulnet.kuleuven.be) used invalid HELO/EHLO cavuit02.kulnet.kuleuven.be - verification failed X-Spam-Score: -0.9 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Stefan, group, JT9 does indeed look very promising. Earlier tonight I had a QSO with LA4ANA in JT9-2 with merely 4W RF power, estimated 20mW ERP at best. It took us just 16 minutes to complete the QSO, that's faster than a QRSS3 QSO. I am pretty sure that with 1W ERP or more real DX is within reach. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [134.58.240.130 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.2 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 3f8d74a8c70dd416d0a3a1dbcb9bb89f Subject: RE: LF: LF WSPR overnight Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1dc14950a2cc2d0d50 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hello Stefan, group, JT9 does indeed look very promising. Earlier tonight I had a QSO with LA4AN= A in JT9-2 with merely 4W RF power, estimated 20mW ERP at best. It took us = just 16 minutes to complete the QSO, that's faster than a QRSS3 QSO. I am pretty sure that with 1W ERP or more real DX is within reach. 73 Rik ON7YD - OR7T ________________________________________ Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org= ] namens Stefan Sch=E4fer [Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de] Verzonden: dinsdag 13 november 2012 23:17 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Onderwerp: Re: LF: LF WSPR overnight ...because nearly no one is using the mode and because there are already to many modes. I don't even have a cat but the random numbers is an argument :-) I should send some 15P6715P67WCV for Eddie. Many jobs to do... Apart from the jokes, i hope that JT9 makes some new steps soon. If the timing becomes as less critical than in WSPR, it is very promising on LF/MF= ! 73, Stefan Am 13.11.2012 23:02, schrieb Graham: > Why not send ros-mf-2 mode its the same s/n as wspr , > linked to psk -reporter and can send ' the quick brown fox > jumped over the lazey moon' ive two cats and a dog or > anything you like : )) or some random numbers to cause > confusion ): > > (but needs sdr or audio > rf translation) > > G.. > > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "Stefan Sch=E4fer" > Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 9:53 PM > To: > Subject: LF: LF WSPR overnight > >> Dear LF group, >> >> In case someone is interested, i'm spending the night in WSPR (until >> 6 UTC) on 137.44 kHz. >> >> 73, GL, GN, Stefan/DK7FC >>=