Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mi04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id ED8EA38000089; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 02:53:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TUuzu-00033Q-0j for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 04 Nov 2012 07:51:58 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TUuzt-00033H-C4 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 04 Nov 2012 07:51:57 +0000 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TUuzr-0007kR-4G for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 04 Nov 2012 07:51:56 +0000 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 04 Nov 2012 07:51:53 -0000 Received: from p4FEDB14F.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO Clemens0811) [79.237.177.79] by mail.gmx.net (mp012) with SMTP; 04 Nov 2012 08:51:53 +0100 X-Authenticated: #17214767 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19VoDoJDCZVUAqmtsPUvJOxmDBhmXzehW2UT6i9cg FRfYIt84Kxx/4I From: "Clemens Paul" To: References: <00a701cdb9f4$3da16ac0$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <00c301cdb9f5$81dc7fd0$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <50957826.1020906@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <8B6DF9B1D2684ACD8ADBD10ABB0002E6@SV8CSHP> <5095879B.6010807@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <5095B6C7.2070505@freenet.de> In-Reply-To: <5095B6C7.2070505@freenet.de> Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2012 08:51:56 +0100 Message-ID: <6249E7C5E91B418FAB69C5DA97E9E519@Clemens0811> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: Ac26I/PE8oa58qHYRUO5ph1pWThOZgAPH0NA X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.1.7601.17609 X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: I noticed that carrier too last evening and was wondering about its origin. Now I remember that it has been reported recently on the list. As Stefan says,perhaps some IMD2 calculations might help in finding the culprit. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [213.165.64.22 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (cpaul[at]gmx.net) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 3f8d74a8c70dd416d0a3a1dbcb9bb89f Subject: RE: LF:unknown carrier on 472.5 [was: OM1II loud] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d7b8c50961eed71c6 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none I noticed that carrier too last evening and was wondering about its = origin. Now I remember that it has been reported recently on the list. As Stefan says,perhaps some IMD2 calculations might help in finding the culprit.=20 73 Clemens DL4RAJ =20 >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 >[mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of wolf_dl4yhf >Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2012 1:29 AM >To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >Subject: Re: LF: OM1II loud > > > >Am 03.11.2012 22:07, schrieb Stefan Sch=E4fer: >> Lubos, >> >> I can hear OM1II on 472.5 again. But there is the QRM trace which is=20 >> stronger in the evening. I don't think it is local. > >Zigactly. I have that carrier on 472.5 too, since a couple of=20 >months, but these days it's very audible and annoying. I tried=20 >to find an ID (modulation sideband) symmetrically around that=20 >carrier, but didn't find anything related to that frequency. > >The SV beacon was sometimes audible here, and even on Joe's frequency >(504.1 kHz) there was a sometimes audible signal. But=20 >suspiciously the signal was switched off at 23:00 UTC, so I=20 >guess it was something else.=20 >The signal looked like a carrier, some seconds long,=20 >interrupted at regular intervals by a CW ID (which I couldn't=20 >read by ear). I have a screenshot of a spectrogram on the=20 >'portable' computer if anyone is interested. > > >All the best, > Wolf . > > > > >----- >E-Mail ist virenfrei. >Von AVG =FCberpr=FCft - www.avg.de >Version: 2012.0.2221 / Virendatenbank: 2441/5371 -=20 >Ausgabedatum: 03.11.2012=20 >